11666
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11666-11667
Scheme 1
Samarium Iodide-Catalyzed Pinacol Coupling of
Carbonyl Compounds
Ryoji Nomura, Tatsuya Matsuno, and Takeshi Endo*
Research Laboratory of Resources Utilization
Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta-cho
Midori-ku, Yokohama 226, Japan
ReceiVed July 8, 1996
samarium species.7 UV-vis spectroscopic analyses clearly
indicated the existence of the reduction pathway (Table 1). After
the suspension of SmI3 in THF was treated with Mg, the color
change from yellow to dark-blue occurred immediately, and the
characteristic absorptions attributed to SmI2 were observed at
621 and 560 nm (run 1), indicating the formation of SmI2.8 It
should be noted that the absorptions due to SmI2 were also
detected for reactions employing SmBrI2 and SmClI2 (runs 3
and 4). The decrease of the absorbance compared with the
parent SmI2 solution is probably due to the existence of an
equilibrium between SmI2 and SmI3, which might be supported
by the results that the addition of MgI2 to a solution of SmI2
led to the decrease in its absorbance (run 5). These results
indicate that the addition of Mg shifts the equilibrium between
Sm(II) and Sm(III) toward Sm(II) via Scheme 2.
The present SmI2/Mg system could be applied to the pinacol
coupling of carbonyl compounds.9,10 One of the significant
points for the successful pinacol coupling under this system is
to maintain the concentration of divalent samarium higher than
that of carbonyl compounds to avoid the competition between
the coupling and the Sm(III)-promoted reactions, such as
benzoin condensation and the Tishchenko reaction.9e In other
words, a fast regeneration of Sm(II) is required. The reduction
of initially formed samarium(III) pinacolate is expected to be
slower than that of SmClI2 due to the electron-donating alkoxide.
Therefore, the use of chlorotrimethylsilane (TMSCl)11 would
transform the samarium(III) pinacolate into its silyl ether along
with the formation of SmClI2 to afford the desired reaction
pathway. Indeed, the highest yield of the product (66%),
comparable with that of the stoichiometric reaction (run 5), was
attainable by slow addition of a mixture of benzaldehyde (1
equiv) and TMSCl (1 equiv) to a mixture of SmI2 (0.1 equiv),
TMSCl (0.5 equiv), and an excess of Mg in THF at room
temperature (run 1 in Table 2).12 It is notable that the color of
the reaction mixture of dark blue immediately changed into pale
One of the most remarkable developments in recent organic
synthesis is the application of divalent samarium compounds
as excellent reducing agents.1 Since the pioneering works by
Kagan and Inanaga in the chemistry of samarium(II) iodide
(SmI2), a wide variety of novel types of electron transfer
reactions which are far superior to the traditional ones in both
efficiency and selectivity have been reported.1 Unfortunately,
almost all of the electron transfer reactions required more than
a stoichiometric amount of samarium complexes, except for few
examples of hydride transfer reductions such as the Meerwein-
Ponndorf-Verley (MPV) reduction2 and the Tishchenko reac-
tion.3 This is simply because a catalytic cycle of them has not
been established.4 This limitation strongly decreases the
synthetic value of the reactions promoted by low-valent sa-
marium complexes. In this work, we report our preliminary
investigation of the establishment of a catalytic cycle of SmI2
for the reduction of carbonyl compounds.
In order to achieve the catalytic cycle of SmI2, a reduction
pathway of trivalent into divalent samarium species is required
(path A in Scheme 1). The previous studies on low-valent
samarium-mediated reductions using Sm as a reducing agent5
and the similar reduction potential between Sm and Mg (-2.41
and -2.37 V, respectively) would offer a possibility that Mg
serves as reducing agent of trivalent samarium.6 Indeed, it was
easily found that trivalent samarium salts such as SmI3, SmBrI2,
and SmClI2 underwent the reduction by Mg to provide divalent
(1) For recent reviews for the application of low-valent samarium
compounds into organic chemistry, see: (a) Molander, G. A.; Harris, C. R.
Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 307. (b) Imamoto, T. Lanthanides in Organic
Synthesis; Academic Press: London, Great Britain, 1994. (c) Molander,
G. A. Chem. ReV. 1992, 92, 29. (d) Molander, G. A. ComprehensiVe
Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford,
Great Britain, 1991; Vol. 1, Chapter 9, p 251. (e) Inanaga, J. Yuki Gosei
Kagaku Kyokaishi 1989, 47, 200. (f) Kagan, H. B.; Namy, J. L.
Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 6573. (g) Kagan, H. B.; Namy, J. L. In Handbook
on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths; Gschneidner, Jr., K. A.,
Eyring, L., Eds.; Elsevier Science Publishers: Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
1984; Vol. 6, Chapter 50, p 525.
(2) (a) Evans, D. A.; Nelson, S. G.; Gagne´, M. R.; Muci, A. R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9800. (b) Lebrun, A.; Namy, J. L.; Kagan, H. B.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 2355. (c) Okano, T.; Matsuoka, M.; Konishi,
H. Chem. Lett. 1987, 181. (d) Namy, J. L.; Souppe, J.; Collin, J.; Kagan,
H. B. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 2045.
(7) Magnesium metal was activated by vigorous stirring as a usual
Grignard technique. SmI3 and SmBrI2 were prepared by the reaction of
SmI2 with iodine or bromine. SmClI2 was synthesized by the reaction of
SmI2 with 1 equiv of benzyl chloride. The concentration of SmClI2 was
not determined in this experiment.
(8) Girard, P.; Namy, J. L.; Kagan, H. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102,
2693.
(3) (a) Evans, D. A.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6447.
(b) Uenishi, J.; Masuda, S.; Wakabayashi, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32,
5097. (c) Yokoo, K.; Mine, N.; Taniguchi, H.; Fujiwara, Y. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1985, 279, C19.
(4) SmCl3-associated electroreductions were reported although it appears
to be difficult to conclude that electrochemically formed Sm(II) species
work as reducing agents. See: (a) He´bri, H.; Dun˜ach, E.; Pe´richon, J. J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993, 499. (b) Espanet, B.; Dun˜ach, E.;
Pe´richon, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 2485. (c) He´bri, H.; Dun˜ach, E.;
Pe´richon, J. Synlett 1992, 293. (d) He´bri, H.; Dun˜ach, E.; Pe´richon, J. Syn.
Commun. 1991, 21, 2377. (e) He´bri, H.; Dun˜ach, E.; Heintz, M.; Troupel,
M.; Pe´richon, J. Synlett 1991, 901. (f) Le´onard, E.; Dun˜ach, E.; Pe´richon,
J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989, 276.
(9) For examples of SmI2-mediated pinacol coupling, see: (a) Namy, J.
L.; Souppe, J.; Kagan, H. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 765. (b) Souppe,
J.; Danon, L.; Namy, J. L.; Kagan, H. B. J. Organomet. Chem. 1983, 250,
227. (c) Fu¨rstner, A.; Csuk, R.; Rohrer, C.; Weidmann, H. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1988, 1729. (d) Shiue, J. S.; Lin, C. C.; Fang, J. M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 335. (e) Okaue, Y.; Isobe, T. Mem. Fac. Sci.,
Kyushu UniV., Ser. C 1992, 18, 179.
(10) For examples of Mg-promoted pinacol coupling reactions, see: (a)
Rausch, M. D.; McEwen, W. E.; Kleinberg, J. Chem. ReV. 1957, 57, 417.
(b) Fu¨rstner, A.; Csuk, R.; Rohrer, C.; Weidmann, H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1988, 1729. (c) Csuk, R.; Fu¨rstner, A.; Weidmann, H. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1986, 1802. (d) Adams, R.; Adams, E. W. Organic
Syntheses; Wiley: New York, 1941; Collect. Vol. I, p 459.
(5) (a) Ogawa, A.; Nanke, T.; Sumino, Y.; Ryu, I.; Sonoda, N. Chem.
Lett. 1994, 379. (b) Yanada, R.; Bessho, K.; Yanada, K. Chem. Lett. 1994,
1279. (c) Murakami, M.; Hayashi, M.; Ito, Y. Synlett. 1994, 179. (d)
Yoshizawa, T.; Hatajima, T.; Amino, H.; Imamoto, T. Nihonkagakukaishi
1993, 482. (e) Ogawa, A.; Takami, N.; Sekiguchi, M.; Ryu, I.; Kambe,
N.; Sonoda, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 8729.
(6) Sonoda et al. reported that the Sm/SmI2 system promotes the
deoxygenative coupling of amides. They have also shown that this reaction
proceeds by using both a catalytic amount of SmI2 and excess of Mg
although any further investigation was not performed. See, ref 5e.
(11) (a) Fu¨rstner, A.; Shi, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2533. (b)
Fu¨rstner, A.; Hupperts, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 4468. (c) Hirao,
T.; Hasegawa, T.; Muguruma, Y.; Ikeda, T. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 366.
(12) A typical procedure was as follows: To a 0.1 M solution of SmI2
in dry THF (2 mL) containing 1 mmol of TMSCl and 400 mg of magnesium
turnings (Nacalai Tesque) was added dropwise the mixture of carbonyl
compound (2 mmol) and TMSCl (2 mmol) over 2 h. After the complete
consumption of carbonyl compound, an extractive workup with ether
followed by purification (SiO2 column chromatography) gave the mixture
(dl and meso) of pinacols.
S0002-7863(96)02331-1 CCC: $12.00 © 1996 American Chemical Society