however, no direct methods for the synthesis of amino-
methyl morpholines from alkenols have appeared.6c
We have recently reported that copper(II) carboxylates
promote and catalyze intramolecular alkene aminooxygena-
tion and diamination reactions.8,9 In these reactions, nitro-
gen heterocycles are formed via a mechanism involving cis-
aminocupration across the alkene.3k In these studies, all of
the alkene substrates were tethered to amine nucleophiles.
More recently, we have begun exploring copper-promoted
and -catalyzed intramolecular additions of alcohols to
alkenes.10 Both carboetherification and hydroetherification
reactions have been achieved where the reaction is thought to
initiate with a cis-oxycupration of the alkene.10 This paper
describes an expansion of this method to the alkene oxya-
mination reaction, and both five- and six-membered ring
oxygen-containing heterocycles have resulted (vide infra).
Our interest in the synthesis of morpholines led us to
explore the copper(II) 2-ethylhexanoate-promoted cycliza-
tion/amination reactions of β-hydroxy-N-allylsulfonamide
1a. Substrate 1a was synthesized from L-phenylalanine in
three steps and 78% overall yield as illustrated in eq 1.
In this reaction, we found that the higher boiling xylenes
proved to be a better solvent than PhCF3 at 130 °C, the
temperature these reactions performed best at (Table 1,
entries 1À3). We found the copper(II) loading could be
reduced from 3 to 2 equiv without diminishing the isolated
yield (Table 1, compare entries 3 and 4). Decreasing the
copper(II) loading to 1.5 equiv resulted in diminished
conversion (Table 1, entry 5).
Table 1. Optimization of the Alkene Oxyaminationa
entry
equiv of Cu(eh)2
solvent
yield (%)b
1c
2
3
PhCF3
PhCF3
xylenes
xylenes
xylenes
xylenes
45d
50d
85
3
3
3
4
2
87
5
6c
1.5
2
50d
80d
a Conditions: Substrate 1a (0.116 mmol) in solvent (0.1 M) was treated
with the specified amount of Cu(eh)2, Cs2CO3 (1 equiv), and TsNH2
(1.5 equiv) at 130 °C for 24 h unless otherwise noted. Only one diastereomer
(dr >20:1) was observed by 1H NMR. b Isolated yield unless otherwise
noted. c Reaction run at 120 °C. d Percent conversion based on 1H NMR
analysis of the crude mixture. The remainder of the material balance is
starting substrate. Cu(eh)2 = copper(II) 2-ethylhexanoate.
Upon treatment with copper(II) 2-ethylhexanoate
(3 equiv) in the presence of TsNH2, β-hydroxy-N-allylsul-
fonamide 1a underwent oxyamination to provide morpho-
line 2a as a single diastereomer (>20:1 dr) in 45% yield
(Table 1, entry 1). Bouyed by this promising initial result, we
optimized the product yield and copper(II) loading in this
reaction (Table 1). Copper(II) 2-ethylhexanoate [Cu(eh)2]
was chosen as the copper(II) source as it is very soluble in
nonpolar organic solvents where analogous alkene difunc-
tionalization reactions tend to perform well.3iÀk,10
Lowering the reaction temperature from 130 to 120 °C
resulted in lower conversion, as well (Table 1, compare
entries 4 and 6). No conversion to product was observed
under conditions where a catalytic amount of Cu(2-
ethylhexanoate)2 (20 mol %) and a stoichiometric amount
of MnO2 (3 equiv) was used as oxidant under otherwise
optimal reaction conditions (130 °C in xylenes). We have
previously used MnO2 successfully in analogous reactions
to turnover catalytic amounts of Cu(II).8,9c,10
Using the optimized reaction conditions (Table 1, entry 4),
we examined the copper(II)-promoted oxyamination reac-
tion of a number of β-hydroxy-N-allylsulfonamides (Table 2,
entries 1À8). Alkyl, phenyl, silyloxymethyl, and benzyl-
sulfidomethyl substituents were all tolerated in the reaction,
albeit the sulfide’s conversion was lower (Table 2, entry 5)
and the phenyl-substituted substrate 1i (Table 2, entry 8)
gave a comparably lower diastereoselectivity (dr = 6:1).
N-Nosyl- and N-mesyl-containing substrates 1g and 1h
reacted with similar efficiencies as the N-tosyl substrate 1a
(Table 2, entries 6 and 7).
Various nitrogen nucleophiles were explored as sum-
marized in Table 2, entries 9À15. Sulfonamide nucle-
ophiles including the easily desulfonylated nosyl and
2-trimethylsilylethylsulfonamide generally performed well
(Table 2, entries 9À12), but the reaction with methanesul-
fonamide gave a lower conversion and the copper(II)
loading had to be increased to 4 equiv for a reasonable
isolated yield (Table 2, entry 11). The benzamide nucleo-
phile also underwent the coupling; however, increased
copper(II) loading (3À4 equiv) was critical to obtaining
(6) (a) Lai, J.-Y.; Shi, X.-X.; Gong, Y.-S.; Dai, L.-X. J. Org. Chem. 1993,
58, 4775–4777. (b) Uozumi, Y.; Tanahashi, A.; Hayashi, T. J. Org. Chem.
1993, 58, 6826–6832. (c) Wilkinson, M. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 4773–
4775. (d) Lanman, B. A.; Myers, A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1045–1047. (e) Dave,
R.; Sasaki, N. A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 15–18. (f) Pedrosa, R.; Andres, C.;
Mendiguchia, P.; Nieto, J. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 8854–8863. (g) Leathen,
M. L.; Rosen, B. R.; Wolfe, J. P. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 5107–5110.
(h) Chowdhury, C.; Mukherjee, S.; Das, B.; Achari, B. J. Org. Chem.
2009, 74, 3612–3615. (i) Ghorai, M. K.; Shukla, D.; Das, K. J. Org.
Chem. 2009, 74, 7013–7022. (j) Albanese, D.; Landini, D.; Penso, M.;
Tagliabue, A.; Carlini, E. Org. Process. Res. Dev. 2010, 14, 705–711.
(k) Bornholdt, J.; Felding, J.; Kristensen, J. L. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 7454–
7457. (l) Ritzen, B.; Hoekman, S.; Verdasco, D. D.; van Delft, F. L.; Rutjes,
F. P. J. T. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 3461–3464. (m) Bera, S.; Panda, G. ACS
Comb. Sci. 2012, 14, 1–4. (n) Lu, Z.; Stahl, S. S. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 1234–
1237. (o) O’Reilly, M. C.; Lindsley, C. W. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2910–2913.
(p) Gharpure, S. J.; Prasad, J. V. K. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 10325–10331.
(7) Ancliff, R. A.; Cook, C. M.; Eldred, C. D.; Gore, P. M.; Harrison,
S. T.; Judd, D. B.; Keeling, S. E.; Lewell, X. Q.; Mills, G.; Robertson,
G. M.; Swanson, S.; Walker, A. J.; Wilkinson, M. U.S. Patent Appl.
7,622,464 (Glaxo Group Limited), Nov. 24, 2009.
(8) Chemler, S. R. J. Organomet. Chem. 2011, 696, 150–158.
(9) (a) Zabawa, T. P.; Kasi, D.; Chemler, S. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 11250–11251. (b) Zabawa, T. P.; Chemler, S. R. Org. Lett.
2007, 9, 2035–2038. (c) Sequeira, F. C.; Turnpenny, B. W.; Chemler,
S. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6365–6368.
(10) Miller, Y.; Miao, L.; Hosseini, A.; Chemler, S. R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2012, 134, 12149–12156.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX