Hydrolysis of a 3′,3′,5′-Trinucleoside Monophosphate
added and the resulting mixture was washed with saturated
aqueous NaHSO3 (2 × 20 mL). The aqueous phase was
extracted with dichloromethane (2 × 50 mL). The combined
organic phases were dried with Na2SO4 and evaporated to
dryness. The product was purified on a silica gel column with
a mixture of CH2Cl2 and MeOH as an eluent (90:10, v/v). The
purified product was then dissolved in saturated methanolic
ammonia. After being stirred for 2 h at room temperature the
reaction mixture was evaporated to dryness. Yield 0.11 g
(34%). 31P NMR (δP) (202 MHz, DMSO-d6) -0.02. 1H NMR (δH)
(400 MHz, DMSO-d6) 7.72 (d, 2H, J ) 8.1 Hz), 5.83 (d, 2H, J
) 5.8 Hz), 5.69 (d, 2H, J ) 8.1 Hz), 4.47 (m, 2H), 4.20 (m, 2H),
3.84 (m, 2H), 3.60-3.48 (m, 4H), 3.33 (s, 6H), 3.32 (s, 6H).
HRMS (FAB) M- calcd 605.1496, obsd 605.1496.
dissolved in saturated methanolic ammonia. After being
stirred for 7.5 h at room temperature the reaction mixture was
evaporated to dryness. The residue was dissolved in anhydrous
THF (1 mL) and triethylamine trihydrofluoride (0.27 mL) was
added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 45 min at 45 °C,
after which 10 mL of 0.1 mol L-1 of aqueous NaOAc (10 mL)
was added. The mixture was evaporated to dryness and a CH2-
Cl2/aq NaOAc workup was performed. The aqueous phase was
concentrated under reduced pressure and the product was
purified by HPLC on a LiChrospher RP-18 column (10 × 250
mm2, 10 µm) eluting with a mixture of 0.06 mol L-1 of aqueous
NaOAc and MeCN (91:9, v/v). Finally the buffer salts were
removed on the same column by eluting with a mixture of
water and MeCN. Yield 67.7 mg (21%). 31P NMR (δP) (162
MHz, DMSO-d6) 0.64. 1H NMR (δH) (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) 8.40
(s, 1H), 8.16 (s, 1H), 7.89 (s, 1H), 7.32 (s, 2H), 6.53 (s, 2H),
6.14 (d, 1H, J ) 5.6 Hz), 5.72 (d, 1H, J ) 6.8 Hz), 5.28 (dd,
1H, J 1 ) 6.0 Hz, J 2 ) 3.4 Hz), 5.17 (s, 1H), 5.12 (s, 1H), 4.96
(dd, 1H, J 1 ) 8.1 Hz, J 2 ) 4.1 Hz), 4.34 (m, 2H), 4.28 (m, 1H),
3.86 (m, 1H), 3.44-3.41 (m, 4H). HRMS (FAB) M- calcd
623.1364, obsd 623.1376.
2′,5′-Di-O-m et h ylu r id ylyl-(3′,5′)-(2′,3′-O-m et h ylen ea d -
en osin e) (6). 2′,5′-Di-O-methyluridine (4, 0.763 mmol, 0.2076
g) was dried by coevaporating from anhydrous pyridine and
anhydrous MeCN. To the residue were added a solution of
tetrazole (0.916 mmol) in MeCN (2.035 mL) and 2-cyanoethyl-
N,N,N′,N′-tetraisopropylphosphorodiamidite (0.916 mmol, 0.291
mL). After being stirred for 60 min at room temperature, the
reaction mixture was evaporated to dryness. A conventional
CH2Cl2/aq NaHCO3 workup was performed and the combined
aqueous phases were evaporated to dryness. To the residue
was added N6-benzoyl-2′,3′-O-methyleneadenosine (3, 0.787
mmol, 0.3015 g), and the resulting mixture was dried by
coevaporating from anhydrous pyridine and anhydrous MeCN.
The residue was dissolved in a solution of tetrazole (0.916
mmol) in MeCN (3.035 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred
for 67 h at room temperature, after which iodine (1.43 mmol,
0.37 g) in a mixture of THF (8 mL), water (4 mL), and 2,6-
lutidine (2 mL) was added. After being stirred for an additional
7 h at room temperature, the reaction mixture was concen-
trated under reduced pressure and a CH2Cl2/aq NaHSO3
workup was carried out. The combined organic phases were
evaporated to dryness and the product was purified on a silica
gel column with a mixture of CH2Cl2 and MeOH as an eluent
(93:7, v/v). The purified product was then dissolved in satu-
rated methanolic ammonia. After being stirred for 7 h at room
temperature the reaction mixture was evaporated to dryness.
The product was purified by HPLC on a LiChrospher RP-18
column (10 × 250 mm2, 10 µm) eluting with a mixture of 0.06
mol L-1 of aqueous NaOAc and MeCN (91.5:8.5, v/v). Finally
the buffer salts were removed on the same column by eluting
with a mixture of water and MeCN. Yield 55.5 mg (11%). 31P
NMR (δP) (162 MHz, DMSO-d6) -0.36. 1H NMR (δH) (400 MHz,
DMSO-d6) 11.36 (s, 1H), 8.44 (s, 1H), 8.14 (s, 1H), 7.68 (d, 1H,
J ) 8.4 Hz), 7.31 (s, 2H), 6.12 (d, 1H, J ) 3.0 Hz), 5.81 (d, 1H,
J ) 5.6 Hz), 5.68 (dd, 1H, J 1 ) 8.1 Hz, J 2 ) 2.1 Hz), 5.30 (dd,
1H, J 1 ) 6.4 Hz, J 2 ) 3.2 Hz), 5.16 (s, 1H), 5.11 (s, 1H), 4.95
(dd, 1H, J 1 ) 6.4 Hz, J 2 ) 3.2 Hz), 4.41 (m, 1H), 4.28 (m, 1H),
4.08 (m, 1H), 3.77 (m, 3H), 3.45-3.36 (m, 2H), 3.27 (s, 3H),
3.23 (s, 3H). HRMS (FAB) M- calcd 612.1455, obsd 612.1472.
Gu a n osyl-(3′,5′)-(2′,3′-O-m eth ylen ea d en osin e) (2a ). N6-
Benzoyl-2′,3′-O-methyleneadenosine (3, 0.561 mmol, 0.2147 g)
and N2-acetyl-5′-O-(4,4′-dimethoxytrityl)-2′-O-(triisopropylsi-
lyloxymethyl)guanosine 3′-(2-cyanoethyl-N,N-diisopropylphos-
phoramidite) (11, 0.5 mmol, 0.5 g) were dissolved in a solution
of tetrazole (0.63 mmol) in MeCN (1.4 mL). The reaction
mixture was stirred for 1 h at room temperature, after which
iodine (1.82 mmol, 0.47 g) in a mixture of THF (8 mL), water
(4 mL), and 2,6-lutidine (2 mL) was added. After being stirred
for an additional 1 h, the reaction mixture was concentrated
under reduced pressure and a CH2Cl2/aq NaHSO3 workup was
performed. The organic phase was evaporated to dryness and
the residue was dissolved in a mixture of acetic acid and water
(25 mL, 80:20, v/v). After being stirred for 50 min at room
temperature the reaction mixture was evaporated to dryness,
followed by a conventional CH2Cl2/aq NaHCO3 workup. The
organic phase was evaporated to dryness and the product was
purified on a silica gel column eluting with a mixture of CH2-
Cl2 and MeOH (98:2, v/v). The purified product was then
Gu a n osyl-(3′,3′)-(2′,5′-d i-O-m eth ylu r id in e) (2b). 2′,5′-Di-
O-methyluridine (4, 0.551 mmol, 0.15 g) and N2-acetyl-5′-O-
(4,4′-dimethoxytrityl)-2′-O-(triisopropylsilyloxymethyl)gua-
nosine 3′-(2-cyanoethyl-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite) (11,
0.5 mmol, 0.5 g) were dissolved in a solution of tetrazole (0.63
mmol) in MeCN (1.4 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred
at room temperature for 30 min, after which iodine (1.67 mmol,
0.43 g) in a mixture of water (4 mL), tetrahydrofuran (8 mL),
and 2,6-lutidine (2 mL) was added. After being stirred for an
additional 3 h at room temperature, the reaction mixture was
concentrated under reduced pressure. A CH2Cl2/aq NaHSO3
workup was carried out, the organic phase was evaporated to
dryness, and the residue was dissolved in a mixture of acetic
acid and water (25 mL, 80:20, v/v). After being stirred for 3 h
at room temperature, the reaction mixture was evaporated to
dryness, followed by a conventional CH2Cl2/aq NaHCO3 work-
up. The organic phase was evaporated to dryness and the
product was purified on a silica gel column eluting with a
mixture of CH2Cl2 and MeOH, the MeOH content of which was
increased stepwise from 5% to 10%. The purified product was
then dissolved in saturated aqueous ammonia. After being
stirred for 4 h at room temperature the reaction mixture was
evaporated to dryness. The residue was dissolved in a solution
of tetrabutylammonium fluoride (1.62 mmol, 0.422 g) in
anhydrous MeCN (1.6 mL), and the solution was stirred for 3
h
at room temperature. The reaction mixture was then
evaporated to dryness and a CH2Cl2/aq NaOAc workup was
carried out. The aqueous phase was concentrated under
reduced pressure and the product was purified by HPLC on a
LiChrospher RP-18 column (10 × 250 mm2, 10 µm) eluting
with a mixture of 0.06 mol L-1 of aqueous NaOAc and MeCN
(88:12, v/v). The purified product was passed through a Na+-
form Dowex 50-W (100-200 mesh) cation exchange column.
Finally, the buffer salts were removed by HPLC on the same
column as previously eluting with a mixture of water and
MeCN (88:12, v/v). Yield 64.7 mg (20%). 31P NMR (δP) (162
MHz, DMSO-d6) 0.64. 1H NMR (δH) (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) 7.87
(s, 1H), 7.70 (d, 1H, J ) 8.1 Hz), 7.35 (d, 1H, J ) 7.3 Hz), 5.68
(d, 1H, J ) 8.1 Hz), 4.57-4.51 (m, 2H), 4.40 (m, 1H), 4.18 (dd,
1H, J 1 ) 6.2 Hz, J 2 ) 3.0 Hz), 3.94 (m, 1H), 3.87 (t, 1H, J )
5.6 Hz), 3.60-3.49 (m, 4H), 3.34 (s, 3H), 3.30 (s, 3H). HRMS
(FAB) M- calcd 616.1404, obsd 616.1403.
Kin etic Mea su r em en ts. The reactions were carried out
in sealed tubes immersed in a thermostated water bath, the
temperature of which was adjusted to 50 °C within (0.1 °C.
The hydronium ion concentration of the reaction solutions was
adjusted with sodium hydroxide and acetate, triethanolamine,
glycine, and triethylamine buffers. The pH values of the
buffers were calculated from the literature data of the pKa
values of the buffer acids under experimental conditions. The
ionic strength of the solutions was adjusted to 1.0 mol L-1 with
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 69, No. 3, 2004 809