not limited by sensitive functional groups and can be much
more general. Additionally, there is a much greater diver-
sity of commercially available aryl and hetaryl halides for
cross-coupling than of corresponding substrate partners
for reductive amination or N-alkylation. To the best of our
knowledge, only one cross-coupling to install secondary
aminomethyl moieties reaction has been reported, and that
approach employed secondary ammoniomethyl trifluoro-
borates as nucleophiles (Scheme 2, path a).4 Even though
this method proved to be a good synthetic pathway to
access the secondary aminomethyl moiety, the scope of the
coupling reactions was limited to bromides as the electro-
phile, which are more expensiveand appear ina less diverse
range of substructures compared to chlorides. Further-
more, this previously developed method proved effective
for only a few select hetaryl bromides.
Table 1. Synthesis of Potassium Boc-Protected Secondary
Aminomethyltrifluoroborates 3aÀg
Scheme 2
a 1 equiv of K2CO3 was added before KHF2 was added. b A mixture
of 3h and Boc-deprotected 3h.
To overcome these limitations and in continuation of
our studies on aminomethylating agents, Boc-protected
secondary aminomethyltrifluoroborates were imagined as
good candidates for the synthesis of the secondary amino-
methyl moieties (Scheme 2, path b).5 Boc-protected pri-
mary aminomethyltrifluoroborate has already proven to
be an excellent nucleophilic coupling partner in SuzukiÀ
Miyaura cross-coupling reactions with a wide variety of
aryl and hetaryl chlorides5a as well as mesylates.5b After
deprotection of the Boc protecting group, the correspond-
ing aminomethylated arenes are readily accessed.6 There-
fore, we expected the development of Boc-protected
secondary aminomethyltrifluoroborates would also be use-
ful to synthesize secondary aminomethylated arenes.
In this contribution, we disclose the synthesis of potas-
sium Boc-protected secondary aminomethyltrifluorobo-
rates and their application as nucleophiles in the SuzukiÀ
Miyaura cross-coupling reaction with a large variety of
aryl and hetaryl chlorides.
the expected secondary aminomethyltrifluoroborates were
synthesized over two steps: N-alkylation of Boc-protected
amines with iodomethylpinacolboronate7 followed by ad-
dition of KHF2 (Table 1). Seven different Boc-protected
secondary aminomethyltrifluoroborates were prepared in
moderate to good yields. The acetal derivative 2g was
successfully synthesized in 75% yield. Initial attempts to
convert the pinacol boronate to the trifluoroborate failed
because of the acidic reaction media. By adding 1 equiv of
K2CO3 before addition of KHF2, the desired acetal 3g was
obtained in 53% isolated yield (Table 1, entry 7). Unfortu-
nately, we were unable to access aniline derivatives under
these conditions (Table, entry 8). Attempts to generate
such substrates provided a mixture of the desired trifluor-
oborate 3h as well as Boc-deprotected material. These two
trifluoroborates were inseparable.
With these aminomethyltrifluoroborates in hand, the
SuzukiÀMiyaura cross-coupling reaction was studied.
n-ButylBoc-protectedaminomethyltrifluoroborate 3aand
4-chloroanisole were chosen as coupling partners to opti-
mize the reaction conditions. Cross-coupling reactions
were screened extensively with many different palladium
catalysts, ligands, bases, solvents, concentrations, tem-
peratures, and times. Buchwald’s second generation pre-
formed catalyst A8 proved to be the most efficient catalyst
(Figure 2), and thus the best conditions found were the
combination of 4 mol % of XPhos-Pd-G2 A and 3 equiv of
Based on the development of Boc-protected primary
aminomethyltrifluoroborate,5 we first tried to synthesize
the secondary version through a ‘one-pot’ process. How-
ever, all methods tried were unsuccessful. As an alternative,
ꢀ
(4) Fleury-Bregeot, N.; Raushel, J.; Sandrock, D. L.; Dreher, S. D.;
Molander, G. A. Chem.;Eur. J. 2012, 18, 9564.
(5) (a) Molander, G. A.; Shin, I. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3956. (b)
Molander, G. A.; Shin, I. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 3138.
(6) (a) Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. Protective Groups in Organic
Synthesis, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1999. (b) Kocienski, P. J.
Protecting Groups, 3rd ed.; Georg Thieme: Stuttgart, NY, 2005. (c) du
Vigneaud, V.; Behrens, O. K. J. Biol. Chem. 1937, 117, 27. (d) Kharasch,
M. S.; Priestley, H. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1939, 61, 3425. (e) Snyder,
H. R.; Heckert, R. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 2006. (f) Li, S.; Gortler,
L. B.; Waring, A.; Battisti, A.; Bank, S.; Closson, W. D.; Wriede, P.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 5311.
(7) (a) Smoum, R.; Rubinstein, A.; Srebnik, M. Bioorg. Chem. 2003,
31, 464. (b) Matteson, D. S. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1535.
(8) Kinzel, T.; Zhang, Y.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
132, 14073.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 17, 2012
4459