room temperature in good to excellent yields, providing
a very efficient and practical method for the preparation
of γ-lactone derivatives. However, mechanism studies
revealed that this catalytic cyclization reaction did not pro-
ceed via the gold vinylidene intermediate according to our
initial assumption. Instead, it occurred presumably through a
tandem Au-catalyzed oxycyclization, followed by an acid-
accelerated oxidation sequence, which behaved distinctively
different from the related Ru-catalyzed reactions, where the
intermediacy of ruthenium vinylidene was proposed.3a In this
paper, we report these preliminary results.
Homopropargyl alcohol 1a was chosen as the model
substrate for our initial study. Considering that strong
nucleophilic oxidants such as quinoline/pyridine N-oxides
would lead to the formation of dihydrofuran-3-ones5f via an
R-oxo gold carbene intermediate, we initially examined the
reaction by using the oxidants which worked well in the Ru-
catalyzed oxidative cyclization.3a However, all (maleimide,
N-hydroxysuccinimide, and N-hydroxyphthalimide)
failed to furnish the desired lactone. To our delight, it
was found that the corresponding γ-lactone 2a could be
obtained in 50% yield by using m-CPBA as the oxidant
(Table 1, entry 1). Among the different gold catalysts
examined (entries 2ꢀ8), (4-CF3C6H4)3PAuNTf2 gave a
slightly improved yield (entry 7). We were pleased to find
that the addition of acids substantially improved the
reaction (entries 9ꢀ12), and an excellent yield (90%) could
be achieved in the presence of 1.0 equiv of MsOH (entry
11). The use of other acids failed to improve the yield
(entries 13 and 14). Of note, without using any gold cata-
lyst, noγ-lactone2awas observedunder the acidicreaction
conditions, and PtCl2 and AgNTf2 were not effective in
promoting this reaction (entries 15 and 16).
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditionsa
entry
gold catalyst
Ph3PAuNTf2
acid (equiv)
yieldb (%)
1
50
26
27
8
2
Cy-JohnPhosAuNTf2
XPhosAuNTf2
3
4
BrettPhosAuNTf2
Et3PAuNTf2
5
24
8
6
IPrAuNTf2
7
(4-CF3C6H4)3PAuNTf2
(C6F5)3PAuNTf2
(4-CF3C6H4)3PAuNTf2
(4-CF3C6H4)3PAuNTf2
(4-CF3C6H4)3PAuNTf2
(4-CF3C6H4)3PAuNTf2
(4-CF3C6H4)3PAuNTf2
(4-CF3C6H4)3PAuNTf2
PtCl2
53
25
61
72
90c
81
77
16
16
<5e
8
9
MsOH (0.2)
MsOH (0.5)
MsOH (1.0)
MsOH (1.3)
CF3CO2H (1.0)
HNTf2 (1.0)
MsOH (1.0)
MsOH (1.0)
10
11
12
13
14
15d
16
AgNTf2
a Reaction conditions: [1a] = 0.05 M; DCE: 1, 2-dichloroethane.
b Estimated by 1H NMR using diethyl phthalate as internal reference. c Yield
of isolated 2a was 86%. d Toluene, 80 °C. e Most 1a remained unreacted.
were readily allowed (entries 9ꢀ13). Moreover, tertiary
homopropargylic alcohols were suitable substrates for this
reaction to furnish the corresponding γ-lactones (entries
14ꢀ18). Notably, substrates 1t and 1u could also
undergo smooth tandem cycloisomerization to afford
the strained 5,6-cis-fused 2t and 2u, highlighting the syn-
thetic utility of this methodology (entries 19 and 20). To
test the practicality of the current catalytic system, the
reaction was carried out on a gram scale in the presence of
2.5 mol % of gold catalyst, and the desired product 2a was
afforded in 85% yield (entry 21). Finally, it should be
pointed out that a number of the γ-lactones in Table 2 are
of significant interest, including 2a, a food additive;8 2g, an
intermediate as an antituberculosis agent;9 2o, known for
anticonvulsant activity;10 2p, a commercial liqorice root
extract;11 and 2r, a perfuming agent.12
Under the optimal reaction conditions, various homo-
propargyl alcohols were tested to examine the generality of
the current reaction. As shown in Table 2, this reaction
proceeded smoothly with various substrates, and the yields
ranged from 56% to 92%. A range of functional groups
were tolerated, including bromo (entry 4), azido (entry 5),
protected amino (entry 6), and hydroxy (entries 7 and 8).
In addition, aromatic substrates also gave the correspond-
ing γ-lactones in moderate to good yields, and sub-
stitutions on the aromatic ring at different positions
The utility of this chemistry was further demonstrated
in the concise and efficient synthesis of steroidal spiro-γ-
lactone 2v (Scheme 1), which showed efficient inhibitory
activity for enzyme 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase
(17β-HSD).13 Starting from estrone, the formation of the
spiro-γ-lactone 2v was achieved in a respectable 58% yield.
(5) (a) Wang, Y.; Ji, K.; Lan, S.; Zhang, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2012, 51, 1915. (b) He, W.; Li, C.; Zhang, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133,
8482. (c) Ye, L.; He, W.; Zhang, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50,
3236. (d) Lu, B.; Li, C.; Zhang, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 14070. (e)
Ye, L.; He, W.; Zhang, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 8550. (f) Ye, L.;
Cui, L.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 3258.
(6) (a) Dateer, R. B.; Pati, K.; Liu, R.-S. Chem. Commun. 2012, 7200.
(b) Qian, D.; Zhang, J. Chem. Commun. 2012, 7082. (c) Xiao, J.; Li, X.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7226. (d) Mukherjee, A.; Dateer, R. B.;
Chaudhuri, R.; Bhunia, S.; Karad, S. N.; Liu, R.-S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2011, 133, 15372. (e) Vasu, D.; Hung, H.-H.; Bhunia, S.; Gawade, S. A.;
Das, A.; Liu, R.-S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 6911. (f) Qian, D.;
Zhang, J. Chem. Commun. 2011, 11152. (g) Davies, P. W.; Cremonesi,
A.; Martin, N. Chem. Commun. 2011, 379.
(7) For relaying “O” from m-CPBA to a tethered CꢀC triple bond via
gold catalysis, see: (a) Cui, L.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009, 131, 8394. (b) Cui, L.; Zhang, G.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, L. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 1225. For pioneering work in the acid-accelerated oxidation of
protected lactols into lactones using m-CPBA, see: (c) Grieco, P. A.;
Oguri, T.; Yokoyama, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 19, 419.
(8) Delort, E.; Velluz, A.; Frerot, E.; Rubin, M.; Jaquier, A.; Linder,
S.; Eidman, K. F.; MacDougall, B. S. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59,
11752.
(9) Yuan, H.; He, R.; Wan, B.; Wang, Y.;Pauli, G. F.; Franzblau, S. G.;
Kozikowski, A. P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 5311.
(10) Fernando, V. D.; Carlos, W. R.; Sonia, R. O. Rev. Mex. Cienc.
Farm. 1974, 5, 85.
€
(11) Naf, R.; Jaquier, A. Flavour Fragr. J. 2006, 21, 193.
(12) Delay, F.; Giersch, W. K.; Ohloff, G. Eur. Pat. Appl. 1986
103491, 1986.
(13) (a) Sam, K. M.; Auger, S.; Luu-The, V.; Poirier, D. J. Med.
Chem. 1995, 38, 4518. (b) Bydal, P.; Luu-The, V.; Labrie, F.; Poirier, D.
Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 632.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 18, 2012
4959