S.J. Stevens et al. / Tetrahedron 67 (2011) 6479e6481
6481
4.2. Bromocyclobutanone 11
was added at ꢀ78 ꢁC. When the starting material was consumed as
evidenced by TLC the reaction was quenched with saturated NH4Cl
solution. The aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O. The combined
organics were washed with H2O and dried over MgSO4 and con-
centrated in vacuo. The crude material was dissolved in Et2O,
treated with excess diazomethane at room temperature, and
concentrated in vacuo. The crude material was flashed in
20:1e10:1e4:1 hexanes/EtOAc to furnish 14 (0.101 g, 20% yield).
Cyclobutanone 9 (0.134 g, 0.43 mmol) was dissolved in THF
(10 mL) and cooled to ꢀ78 ꢁC and TBS-OTf (0.29 mL, 1.29 mmol)
was added slowly. Then a 1 M solution of LiHMDS in THF (2.2 mL,
2.15 mmol) was added rapidly down the side of the flask. After 1 h
the reaction was carefully quenched with saturated NH4Cl solution.
The aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O. The combined organics
were washed with H2O and dried over MgSO4 and then concen-
trated in vacuo. The crude material was dissolved in THF (10 mL)
and cooled to 0 ꢁC. The resultant solution was treated with NBS
(0.084 g, 0.47 mmol, added in one portion) and allowed to warm to
room temperature and stir for 1 h. The reaction was quenched with
H2O and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O. The combined
organics were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4 and concen-
trated in vacuo. The crude material was flashed (10:1 hexanes/
EtOAc) to furnish 11 (0.065 g, 40% yield, two steps). Rf¼0.28, 4:1
Rf¼0.31, 4:1 hexanes/EtOAc; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
d 7.37e7.21
(m, 8H), 7.10e7.08 (m, 2H), 6.66 (d, J¼1.9 Hz, 1H), 6.13 (d, J¼0.7 Hz,
1H), 5.49 (d, J¼8.9 Hz, 1H), 4.58 (s, 2H), 4.14 (dd, J¼11.7, 8.7 Hz, 2H),
3.89 (d, J¼6.8 Hz, 2H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 3.35e3.28 (m, 2H), 2.95 (q,
J¼4.8 Hz, 1H), 2.83e2.76 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3)
d
165.7, 160.2, 140.9, 138.2, 138.0, 128.5, 128.3, 128.0, 127.7, 127.5,
114.6,111.5, 75.2, 73.5, 73.2, 72.3, 68.8, 52.3, 51.0, 49.0, 38.7; IR (NaCl
thin film): 3301 (w), 3030 (w), 2950 (w), 2857 (m), 1725 (m), 1693
(s),1312 (s),1209 (s),1073 (s), 740 (s), 698 (s); HRMS (ESIeAPCI) m/z
calcd for C26H28BrO6 [MþH]þ: 515.1064, found: 515.105.
hexanes/EtOAc; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
d 7.39e7.29 (m, 10H),
4.99 (dd, J¼7.7, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 4.64e4.56 (m, 2H), 4.56e4.50 (m, 2H),
3.83 (dt, J¼9.9, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 3.78e3.70 (m, 2H), 3.65e3.56 (m, 2H),
Acknowledgements
2.87e2.81 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3)
d 199.3, 137.9, 137.8,
128.6, 128.5, 128.0, 127.8, 127.7, 127.6, 73.3, 73.2, 67.9, 66.2, 58.4,
48.3, 41.0 IR (NaCl thin film): 3030 (w), 2857 (w), 1792 (s), 1113 (m),
737 (m), 697 (m); HRMS (ESIeAPCI) m/z calcd for C20H25BrNO3
[MþNH4]þ: 406.1012, found: 406.1011.
Funding from the NIH (1 RO1 CA 93591) and NSF (CHE-1058292)
are gratefully acknowledged. J.L.W. thanks Amgen, Merck, Bristol-
Myers Squibb for financial support. Dr. Chris Rithner, Don Heyse
and Don Dick are acknowledged for their assistance with NMR
analysis and instrumentation.
4.3. Furanyl cyclobutanone 12
Supplementary data
A solution of 3-furoic acid 3 (0.028 g, 0.249 mmol) in THF (3 mL)
was cooled to ꢀ78 ꢁC and treated with a 0.5 M solution of LDA in
(1 mL, 0.497 mmol). The reaction was stirred for 30 min at ꢀ78 ꢁC
Supplementary data (proton NMR, carbon NMR and IR spectra
for 11, 12 and 14; ROESY spectra for 11 and 12) associated with this
article can be found. Supplementary data associated with this ar-
and then
a solution of bromocyclobutanone 11 (0.088 g,
0.226 mmol) in THF (1 mL) was added. When starting material was
consumed as evidenced by TLC the reaction was quenched with
saturated NH4Cl solution. The aqueous layer was extracted with
Et2O and the combined organic phases were washed with H2O,
dried over MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The crude material
was stirred in Et2O at room temperature and excess diazomethane
was added. The reaction was filtered through MgSO4 and then
concentrated in vacuo. The crude cyclobutanol (0.098 g, 0.19 mmol)
was dissolved in THF (3 mL) and cooled to ꢀ78 ꢁC. The resultant
mixture was treated dropwise with a 1 M solution of LiHMDS in
THF (0.19 mL, 0.19 mmol). The reaction was warmed to room
temperature and when complete by as evidenced by TLC analysis, it
was diluted with EtOAc and washed with 1 M HCl. The aqueous
layer was extracted with EtOAc and the combined organic phases
were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4 and concentrated in
vacuo. The crude material was flashed in 4:1e2:1 hexanes/EtOAc to
furnish cyclobutanone 12 (0.082 g, 60% yield, three steps). Rf¼0.17,
References and notes
2. Roethle, P. A.; Hernandez, P. T.; Trauner, D. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5901e5904.
3. Marrero, J.; Rodriguez, A. D.; Baran, P.; Raptis, R. G. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2551e2554.
4. (a) Bray, C. D.; Pattenden, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 3937e3939; (b) White, J.
D.; Jana, S. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1433e1436; (c) Schweizer, E.; Gaich, T.; Brecker, L.;
Mulzer, J. Synthesis 2007, 3807e3814; (d) Gaich, T.; Arion, V.; Mulzer, J. Het-
erocycles 2007, 74, 855e862; (e) Gaich, T.; Weinstabl, H.; Mulzer, J. Synlett 2009,
1357e1366.
5. Brunner, A. U.S. Patent 6,025,519, 2000.
ꢀ
ꢀ
6. Berube, A. Dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CT 2006.
7. Bisacchi, G. S.; Braitman, A.; Cianci, C. W.; Clark, J. M.; Field, A. K.; Hagen, M. E.;
Hockstein, D. R.; Malley, M. F.; Mitt, T.; Slusarchyk, W. A.; Sundeen, J. E.; Terry, B.
J.; Tuomari, A. V.; Weaver, E. R.; Young, M. G.; Zahler, R. J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34,
1415e1421.
8. Mechanistically, one can envision a 1,2-shift of the furan moiety; however,
displacement of bromine to form an intermediate epoxide, followed by ring
opening and 1,2-shift of hydride is also plausible. Epimerization of any in-
tervening mixtures derived form either process could furnish the observed
isomer. To provide some further insight into this issue, we attempted to assign
the relative stereochemistry of 14 spectroscopically. Unfortunately these efforts
were not fruitful. We thank a referee for discussions of mechanistic possibilities.
9. Unless otherwise stated, reactions were magnetically stirred in flame-dried
glassware under an atmosphere of nitrogen. Triethylamine (Et3N) and metha-
nol were dried over calcium hydride. Benzene, tetrahydrofuran, dichloro-
methane, toluene, and diethyl ether were dried using a solvent purification
system manufactured by SG Water U.S.A., LLC. All other commercially available
reagents were used as received.
All reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) using Sili-
cycle glass-backed extra hard layer, 60 A plates (indicator F-254, 250
umn or flash chromatography was performed with the indicated solvents using
Silicycle SiliaFlashÒ P60 (230e400 mesh) silica gel as the stationary phase. All
melting points were obtained on a Gallenkamp capillary melting point appa-
ratus and are uncorrected.
4:1 hexanes/EtOAc; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
d
7.50 (d, J¼0.9 Hz,
1H), 7.38e7.17 (m, 10H), 6.83 (d, J¼0.9 Hz, 1H), 4.55 (s, 2H), 4.40 (s,
2H), 3.90 (s, 3H), 3.86 (dd, J¼19.0, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 3.59 (dd, J¼16.3,
5.8 Hz, 1H), 3.54e3.49 (m, 2H), 3.03 (dd, J¼14.1, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 2.23
(quint, J¼5.9 Hz, 1H), 2.04e1.96 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3)
d
186.5, 163.3, 152.2, 144.2, 138.4, 138.3, 128.5, 128.4, 127.8, 127.6,
121.7, 113.6, 72.9, 72.8, 70.8, 66.7, 52.5, 30.6, 28.3, 26.7; IR (NaCl thin
film): 3030 (w), 2924 (m), 2857 (m), 1732 (s), 1485 (m), 1306 (m),
1094 (s), 738 (m), 698 (m); HRMS (ESIeAPCI) m/z calcd for
C26H26NaO6 [MþNa]þ: 457.1622, found: 457.1625.
ꢁ
m
m). Col-
4.4. Alcohol 14
Infrared spectra were obtained using a Midac M1200 FTIR or a Nicolet Avatar
320 FTIR. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AM-500, Bruker
Avance DPX-500, Bruker Avance DPX-400, or Varian Inova 400 spectrometer.
A solution of 3-furoic acid (3) (0.123 g, 1.1 mmol) in THF (10 mL)
was cooled to ꢀ78 ꢁC and treated with a 0.5 M solution LDA in THF
(4.4 mL, 2.2 mmol). The reaction was stirred for 30 min at ꢀ78 ꢁC
and then bromocyclobutanone 11 (0.383 g, 1 mmol) in THF (1 mL)
Chemical shifts (
d) are reported in parts per million (ppm) relative to internal
residual solvent peaks from indicated deuterated solvents.