R. Wang et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 4529–4531
4531
Ref.). Notably, under all three kinds of conditions, DABCO was
References and notes
found to be the most effective base for this transformation.
To further investigate the feasibility of this synthetic method for
preparing 2-aminobenzothiazole derivatives, a series of substrates
were examined. The results are summarized in Table 2. As shown
in Table 2, the presented methodology proved to be efficient for
the synthesis of a number of 2-aminobenzothiazole derivatives in
moderate to good yields. However, the electronic nature of the
substituents affected the reaction outcome in very different ways.
For instance, when using one-pot procedure (Methods A and B), for
isothiocyanates bearing electron-donating substituents were sub-
jected to the reaction under standard conditions, there was a lower
yield of the desired adducts formed (Table 2, entry 3b) and the ef-
fect was the reverse for the substrates bearing electron-withdraw-
ing substituents (Table 2, entries 3c–3e). On the contrary, the
presence of electron-donating substituents, such as methyl or
methoxy groups, in the aryl iodide coupling partner of the sub-
strates accelerated the coupling process and successfully furnished
the corresponding 2-aminobenzothiazoles in high yields (Table 2,
entries 3f–3k). Furthermore, completely opposite electronic nature
was observed when using o-iodobenzothioureas as starting mate-
rials (Method C): electron-donating substituents associated with
aryl iodide decreased the product yields and with electron with-
drawing groups increased the product yields. Comparatively, we
found that the electronic nature of the isothiocyanate moiety
seems to have little influence on the reaction, which is evident
from the fact that both the electron-rich and the electron-poor iso-
thiocyanates underwent the intramolecular coupling reaction effi-
ciently in good to excellent yields (Table 2, entries 3l–3q).
Particularly notable, alkyl o-iodobenzothioureas were also suitable
substrates in this process in good yields (Table 2, entries 3r–3s).
In summary, we have successfully developed a straightforward,
high efficient, and base-mediated method for intermolecular or
intramolecular S-arylation providing 2-aminobenzothiazole ring
system derivatives in the absence of transition-metal catalysts
and ligands. Compared with using Cs2CO3 as base, the approach
mediated by DABCO can be applied to wilder range of substrates:
not only to 2-alkylaminobenzothiazoles, but also to 2-aryl-
aminobenzothiazoles, more interestingly, for the substrates of o-
iodoaniline with electron-donating group and phenyl isothiocya-
nate with electron-withdrawing group we could use one-pot pro-
cedure. In the near future we would like to establish other
methodologies for this transformation under transition-metal-free
conditions.
1. (a) Hays, S. J.; Rice, M. J.; Ortwine, D. F.; Johnson, G.; Schwartz, R. D.; Boyd, D. K.;
Copeland, L. F.; Vartanian, M. G.; Boxer, P. A. J. Pharm. Sci. 1994, 83, 1425; (b)
Soneda, T.; Takeshita, H.; Kagoshima, Y.; Yamamoto, Y.; Hosokawa, T.; Konosu,
T.; Masuda, N.; Uchida, T.; Achiwa, I.; Kuroyanagi, J.; Fujisawa, T.; Yokomizo, A.;
Noguchi, T. WO2009084614, 2009.; (c) Aelterman, W.; Lang, Y.; Willemsens, B.;
Vervest, I.; Leurs, S.; DeKnaep, F. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2001, 5, 467–471.
2. Traditional synthetic methods: (a) Bose, D. S.; Idrees, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007,
48, 669; (b) Bose, D. S.; Idrees, M. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 8261; (c) Downer-Riley,
N. K.; Jackson, Y. A. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 7741; (d) Xian, H.; Jing, T. Tetrahedron
2003, 59, 4851; (e) Garin, J.; Melendez, E.; Merchan, F. L.; Merino, P.; Orduna, J.;
Tejero, T. Syn. Commun. 1990, 20, 2327. metal-catalyzed intramolecular
cyclization of 2-halobenzothioureas; (a) Joyce, L. L.; Evindar, G.; Batey, R. A.
Chem. Commun. 2004, 446; (b) Evindar, G.; Batey, R. A. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71,
1802; (c) Wang, J.; Peng, F.; Jiang, J.; Lu, Z.; Wang, L.; Bai, J.; Pan, Y. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2008, 49, 467; (d) Benedí, C.; Bravo, F.; Uriz, P.; Fernandez, E.; Claver, C.;
Castillon, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 6073.
3. Tandem addition/C–S coupling reaction: (a) Ding, Q. P.; He, X. D.; Wu, J. J. Comb.
Chem. 2009, 11, 587; (b) Qiu, J.; Zhang, X.; Tang, R. Y.; Zhong, P.; Li, J. H. Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 2319; (c) Guo, Y.; Tang, R.-Y.; Zhong, P.; Li, J. H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 649; (d) Ding, Q. P.; Cao, B. P.; Liu, X. J.; Zong, Z.-Z.;
Peng, Y. Y. J. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 1607. Oxidative C–H Bond Functionalization;
(e) Joyce, L. L.; Batey, R. A. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2792; (f) Wang, H. B.; Wang, L.;
Shang, J. S.; Li, X.; Wang, H. Y.; Gui, J.; Lei, A. W. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 76.
4. Feng, E. G.; Huang, H.; Zhou, Y.; Ye, D. J.; Jiang, H. L.; Liu, H. J. Comb. Chem. 2010,
12, 422.
5. Shirakawa, E.; Itoh, K.-I.; Higashino, T.; Hayashi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
15537.
6. Liu, W.; Cao, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.; Chung, K. H.; He, C.; Wang, H.; Kwong, F.
Y.; Lei, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 16737.
7. Sun, C.-L.; Li, H.; Yu, D. G.; Yu, M.; Zhou, X.; Lu, X. Y.; Huang, K.; Zheng, S. F.; Li, B.
J.; Shi, Z. J. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 1044.
8. (a) Baltabaev, U. A.; Makhsumov, A. G.; Zakirov, U. B.; Babaev, I. D.;
Shukurullaev, K. Pharm. Chem. J. 2002, 36, 77; (b) Belboukhari, N.; Cheriti, A.;
Djafri, A.; Roussel, C. Asian J. Chem. 2008, 20, 2491; (c) Ramadas, K.; Srinivasan,
N.; Narayanasamy, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 6447.
9. General experimental procedure: o-iodoaniline (1.0 mmol) and phenyl
isothiocyanate (1.2 mmol) was mixtured and stirred for 1 h at room
temperature (Method A), or o-iodoaniline (1.0 mmol) and phenyl
isothiocyanate (1.2 equiv) was mixtured and stirred for 1 h at melting point
temperature of phenyl isothiocyanate (Method B), or o-halobenzothioureas
(1.0 mmol) (Method C), then anhydrous DMSO (5 ml) and base (3.0 mmol) was
added, the stirring continued for about 5–10 h at 130 °C (TLC monitor). After the
reaction was completed, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature
and ice-water was added, then the mixture was extracted with EtOAc. The
combined organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and filtered.
The filtrate was concentrated under vacuum and then the residue was purified
by column chromatography (eluent: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (5:1 to 7:1))
on silica gel to provide the desired product. Analytical data for some
representative compounds: Compound 3a: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ppm):
d = 7.16 (t, J = 7.2, 2H), 7.33 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.50 (d,
J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (dd, J1 = 13 Hz, J2 = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3)
d = 119.5, 120.0, 120.8, 122.6, 124.3, 126.2, 129.6, 130.0, 139.7, 151.4, 164.1. ESI-
HRMS m/z calcd. For [C13H10N2S+H]+: 227.0643, found 227.0649. Compound 3c:
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-D6, ppm): d = 7.14 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (t, J = 7.6 Hz,
1H), 7.40 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.57 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.80 (d, J = 10 Hz, 2H), 10.62
(br, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-D6) d = 119.6, 119.8, 121.6, 123.0, 125.8,
126.4, 129.3, 130.5, 140.0, 152.4, 161.7. ESI-HRMS m/z calcd. For
[C13H9ClN2S+H]+: 260.0175, found 260.0183. Compound 3d: 1H NMR
(400 MHz, DMSO-D6, ppm): d = 7.16 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H),
7.53 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.62 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.82(d,
J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 10.64 (br, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-D6) d = 119.5, 121.4,
125.7, 127.5, 129.3, 130.5, 132.3, 140.1, 154.3, 161.0. ESI-HRMS m/z calcd. For
[C13H9BrN2S+H]+: 303.9670, found 303.09658. Compound 3g: 1H NMR
(400 MHz, DMSO-D6, ppm): d = 2.35 (s, 3H), 7.14 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.49–7.54
(m, 3H), 7.62 (s, 1H), 7.79 (d, J = Hz, 2H), 10.53 (br, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz,
DMSO-D6) d = 21.3, 113.5, 119.5, 119.9, 121.5, 127.5, 130.5, 132.1, 132.3, 10.5,
150.3, 160.9. ESI-HRMS m/z calcd. For [C14H11BrN2S+H]+: 318.9905, found
318.9937. Compound 3r: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): d = 1.15–1.41 (m,
5H), 1.51–1.56 (m, 1H), 1.67–1.73 (m,2H), 2.05–2.30 (m, 2H), 2.66–2.69 (m, 1H),
3.50 (br, s, 1H), 6.99 (t, J = 2.4, 9.3 Hz,1H), 7.27 (dd, J = 2.4, 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (dd,
J = 4.9, 8.8 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d = 24.7, 25.5, 33.5, 57.6, 121.1,
121.3, 123.6, 128.9, 136.9, 152.4, 165.7. ESI-HRMS m/z calcd. For
[C13H16N2S+H]+: 233.1112, found 233.1140.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of
China (31170747) and Chongqing City Natural Science Foundation
of China (No. cstc2011jjA10088) for financial support.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
06.034. These data include MOL files and InChiKeys of the most
important compounds described in this article.