in recent years as a fundamental tool for the synthesis of a
wide array of cyclic structures not easily prepared by conven-
tional methodologies.9 Particularly interesting in this field are
gold- and platinum-catalyzed cycloisomerizations of enynes
that generally entail a rapid increase in structural complexity
from readily available precursors under mild conditions.10
In this regard, we have recently described a gold-cata-
lyzed cycloisomerization of o-alkynylstyrenes that provides
an easy enantioselective access to the indene skeleton and
is proposed to proceed via carbocation I (Scheme 1, via
route a).11 Continuing with our ongoing interest in imple-
menting new applications of gold-catalyzed reactions of
1,3-dien-5-ynes,12 we envisioned that those compounds
could be appropiate substrates for the development of a
new route to benzo[a]fluorene derivatives.13 Thus, we
considered that if a rearrangement of carbocation I by
hydride migration to the adjacent carbon would be possi-
ble, the trapping of the new intermediate II by intramole-
cular nucleophilic attack of an aromatic group could be
favored(Scheme1, viarouteb). Theoveralltransformation
would therefore lead to the formation of the dihydrobenzo-
[a]fluorene skeleton through a formal [3 þ 3] cycloaddi-
tion.14,15 The success of the proposed reaction would ob-
viously depend on the appropiate selection of groups R1 and
R2, which should be able to favor the formation of carbocation
II from the initially generated carbocation I.
To test our hypothesis, we selected as a model substrate
o-alkynylstyrene 1a (4:1 mixture of geometrical isomers),
having an isopropyl group linked to the double bond, that
would generate a rather favored tertiary carbocation upon
migration to form an intermediate of type II. At the outset,
we tested its reactivity in the presence of different cationic
gold complexes and solvents (Table 1). We were glad to
find that by performing the reaction in CH2Cl2 using 5 mol %
of AuPPh3Cl/AgSbF6 as catalyst a high selectivity to the
formation of the dihydrobenzo[a]fluorene products 2a and
iso-2a was obtained, with less than 10% of indene deriva-
tives 3a and iso-3a formed (entry 1). A minor influence of
the ligand of the gold complex was observed (entries 1ꢀ4),
while the counterion plays a crucial role in the outcome of
the reaction (entries 1 vs 5ꢀ9) as indene derivatives 3a and
iso-3a are primarily or even exclusively obtained with
triflate (entry 8) or tosylate (entry 9) counterions. The
solvent also has a significant influence in the selectivity of
the reaction (entries 1 vs 10ꢀ13) with CH2Cl2 being the best
for promoting the formal [3 þ 3] cycloaddition (entry 1),
whereas ethereal solvents lead mainly to the formation of
indene derivatives (entries 12 and 13). It is remarkable how
an appropriate selection of the reaction conditions allows
the selective isolation in good yields of either dihydrobenzo-
[a]fluorene (entry 1) or indene derivatives (entry 9).
Table 1. Effect of the Catalyst and the Solvent in the Selectivity
Scheme 1. Previously Reported Synthesis of Indenes and Pro-
posed Synthesis of Dihydrobenzo[a]fluorenes
2a þ iso-2a
3a þ iso-3a
entry
catalyst
solvent yielda (%)
yielda (%)
1 AuPPh3Cl/AgSbF6 CH2Cl2
94 (80)b
93
6
2 AuPEt3Cl/AgSbF6
3 IPrAuCl/AgSbF6
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
7
80
17
7
4 AuP(OPh)3Cl/AgSbF6CH2Cl2
91
€
(9) (a) Furstner, A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 3208–3221. (b) Das, A.;
5 AuPPh3NTf2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
80
20
25
50
93
100 (78)
14
16
55
82
Sohel, S. M. A.; Liu, R.-S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 960–979.
(c) Shapiro, N. D.; Toste, F. D. Synlett 2010, 675–691. (d) Rudolph,
M.; Hashmi, A. S. K. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 6536–6544.
(10) For reviews, see: (a) Zhang, L.; Sun, J.; Kozmin, S. A. Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 2271–2296. (b) Michelet, V.; Toullec, P. Y.;
6 AuPPh3Cl/AgBF4
7 AuPPh3Cl/AgPF6
8 AuPPh3Cl/AgOTf
9 AuPPh3Cl/AgOTs
75
45
7
^
ꢀ
Genet, J.-P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4268–4315. (c) Jimenez-
ꢀ~
10 AuPPh3Cl/AgSbF6 MeNO2
11 AuPPh3Cl/AgSbF6 toluene
12 AuPPh3Cl/AgSbF6 DME
13 AuPPh3Cl/AgSbF6 THF
80
80
38
8
Nunez, E.; Echavarren, A. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3326–3350.
ꢀ
(11) Martınez, A.; Garcıa-Garcıa, P.; Fernandez-Rodrıguez, M. A.;
Rodrıguez, F.; Sanz, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 4633–4637.
ꢀ
(12) Garcıa-Garcıa, P.; Martınez, A.; Sanjuan, A. M.; Fernandez-
ꢀ
Rodrıguez, M. A.; Sanz, R. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4970–4973.
a Determined by 1H NMR of the crude mixture using 1,3,5-
trimethoxybenzene as internal standard; isolated yield shown in parenth-
eses. b 2a was obtained as a ca. 7:1 mixture of diastereoisomers.
(13) For recent syntheses of benzo[a]fluorene derivatives, see: (a) Liu,
W.; Buck, M.; Chen, N.; Shang, M.; Taylor, N. J.; Asoud, J.; Wu, X.;
Hasinoff, B. B.; Dmitrienko, G. I. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2915–2918.
(b) Chaudhuri, R.; Liao, H.-Y. M.; Liu, R.-S. Chem.;Eur. J. 2009,
15, 8895–8901. (c) Zhang, L.; Xie, X.; Liu, J.; Qi, J.; Ma, D.; She, X. Org.
Lett. 2011, 13, 2956–2958. See also refs 3 and 8. (d) For a recent gold-
catalyzed cascade cyclization that affords benzo[b]fluorenes, see: Chen,
Y.; Chen, M.; Liu, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 6493–6497.
Thus, the best conditions for accomplishing the formal
[3 þ 3] cycloaddition pathway consist of the use of
4779
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 18, 2012