Organic Letters
Letter
a general, protecting-group-independent approach to the
synthesis of protected secondary benzylic alcohol derivatives.
In view of the deficiencies of prior art, we sought to realize the
goal of a protecting-group-independent synthesis of secondary
benzylic alcohols through the application of photoredox/nickel
dual catalysis. This paradigm has recently proven advantageous
for the cross-coupling of various alkylboron and alkylsilicon
reagents under extraordinarily mild conditions and with
unprecedented levels of functional group tolerance.5−7 Although
previous studies confirmed the feasibility of cross-coupling α-
benzyloxyalkyltrifluoroborates,5a,8 it was unclear if the more
electronically deactivated α-acyloxyalkyl derivatives would be
reactive in this manifold.
Scheme 1. Photoredox/Nickel Dual Catalytic Cross-Coupling
of Various α-Alkoxyalkyl and α-Acyloxyalkyltrifluoroborates
with 3-Bromo-5-cyanopyridine
Consistent with previous studies, a catalytic system of
Ir[dFCF3ppy]2(bpy)PF6 1, Ni(COD)2, and dtbbpy proved
most active in promoting the desired reactivity. Use of Ni(II)
sources, such as NiCl2(dme) or Ni(NO3)2·6H2O, is also
possible, but a slight reduction in yield was typically observed
(∼5−20%) Although previous reactions of secondary α-
benzyloxyalkyltrifluoroborates were performed in acetone or
THF with 2,6-lutidine or 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine as
additives,5a,8 the use of dioxane as a solvent and 2 equiv of
K2HPO4 as an additive were found to be most broadly effective
for the cross-coupling of secondary α-alkoxyalkyltrifluoroborates
bearing benzyloxy, pivaloyl, and N,N-diisopropylcarbamoyl
protecting groups. Notably, although the synthesis of these
pivaloyl and N,N-diisopropylcarbamoyl-protected derivatives
were reported previously,4 the present report is the first
successful example of their cross-coupling. This success
effectively highlights the unique strengths of the photoredox/
nickel dual catalytic cross-coupling manifold relative to conven-
tional Pd catalysis, wherein the strongly basic conditions required
for cross-coupling resulted in decomposition of these hydrolyti-
cally unstable protecting groups. Contrasting the conditions
previously reported for the cross-coupling of α-benzyloxyalkyl-
trifluoroborates (105 °C, 5 equiv of CsOH·H2O) with the
conditions reported here for protecting-group-independent
cross-coupling (room temperature, 2 equiv of K2HPO4) only
further underscores these advantages.
These conditions were found to be widely effective for the
cross-coupling of sterically and electronically diverse secondary
α-alkoxyalkyl and α-acyloxyalkyltrifluoroborates, as summarized
in Scheme 1. Notably, these starting materials are easily
synthesized from commercially available aldehydes via a two-
step procedure involving borylation to afford the α-hydrox-
yalkyltrifluoroborate followed by straightforward, base-mediated
protection with the corresponding acyl halide or benzyl bromide.
We chose to examine the scope of alkyltrifluoroborate tolerance
with 3-bromo-5-cyanopyridine as a coupling partner in an effort
to highlight the exceptional tolerance of this method for the
cross-coupling of heteroaryl bromides. Substrates displaying
simple alkyl chains were readily cross-coupled in good to very
good yields as their benzyloxy (2), pivaloyl (3), and carbamoyl
(4) derivatives. α-Branched substrates were also well-tolerated
(5−7), including a sterically hindered α-tert-butyl substrate (9).
Trifluoroborates containing stereocenters could be cross-
coupled with moderate diastereoselection (6, 7, 10). Functional
groups including benzyl ethers (8) and tertiary carbamates (10)
were also well-tolerated.
Both electron-poor and electron-rich aryl bromides provided
products in good to excellent yields. Cross-coupling proceeded
smoothly in the presence of ortho substituents (20, 31).
A tremendous variety of potentially reactive functional groups
were also tolerated. Substrates bearing aldehydes (17), ketones
(18), esters (19), ethers (11, 15), nitriles (20), and
trifluoromethyl groups (13) generated products in good to
excellent yields. Secondary amides, including acetanilide (24)
and oxindole (23), were readily tolerated. Additional protic
nitrogen substituents and heterocycles including sulfonamide
(35), indole (31, 38), pyrazole (25), indazole (34), and
imidazole (38) were cross-coupled readily. Other tolerated
heterocycles include pyridine (30), azaindole (33), thiophene
(35), benzofuran (36), and benzothiophene (37) systems.
Consistent with previous observations, selective cross-coupling
at the aryl bromide site occurred in the reaction of 4-chloro-1-
bromobenzene. Futhermore, the pinacol ester of 4-bromophe-
nylboronic acid smoothly afforded arylboronate product (29),
thereby permitting potentially powerful sequential cross-
coupling sequences with either nucleophilic or electrophilic
partners.8
Most importantly, tolerance was observed for unprotected
primary alcohols, secondary alcohols, and phenols. In this regard,
an aryl bromide linked to a fully unprotected glycoside was cross-
coupled in 68% yield to afford product 27. In these examples,
introduction of the benzylic alcohol in protected form would
avoid any difficulties associated with selective downstream
protection/deprotection in the context of target-oriented
syntheses. Furthermore, the protecting group flexibility offered
by these unified conditions permits strategic selection of the
desired benzylic alcohol protecting group.
We next turned our attention to examining the reaction scope
with regard to the (hetero)aryl bromide partner (Scheme 2).
Here, functional group tolerance far surpasses previous efforts in
the cross-coupling of secondary α-alkoxyalkylmetallic reagents.
Although the presently reported method proved to be highly
amenable to the coupling of electronically and sterically diverse
substrates and also tolerant of a wide variety of functional groups,
several limitations remain. Most notably, α-alkoxyalkyl and α-
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX