Angewandte
Chemie
(entry 2). Going to a MeOH/H2O mixed solvent (Fꢀ1 = 0.73)
caused a further decrease in the yield of 4 and the formation
of some benzyl alcohol 8c (entry 3). In ethanol the reaction
was slower than in methanol and led to an analogous product
mixture (6, 7b, 8b, 9; entry 4). The addition of water to the
solvent (entry 5) caused a marked increase in the fraction of
DHT-derived products to essentially the same value as that
obtained in MeOH/H2O. In contrast, in the presence of
allyltrimethylsilane (ATMS) some of the allylated 5 was
formed,[19a] the yield of which increased with an increase in
the ATMS concentration (entries 6 and 7).
has a marginal effect on the quantum yield, Fꢀ1 = 0.82 in
MeOH/H2O) reversed the distribution with the latter prod-
ucts predominating four to one in MeOH/H2O and three to
one in EtOH/H2O (entries 9 and 12). Gratifyingly, their
distribution closely corresponds to that obtained by cyclo-
aromatization of enyne–allenes (compare the thermally
induced cyclization of (Z)-1,2,4-heptatrien-6-yne (A) in
MeOH/water 9:1 mixture, Scheme 1).[6] Irradiation of 2 in
a CD3OH/H2O mixture led to an increased yield of [D3]-8a
(from 38 to 44%) at the expense of [D3]-7a (from 14 to 2%
yield), thus supporting a primary isotope effect[6] and the key
role of hydrogen abstraction by DHT 14 (entry 10).
The above results fit nicely with the presence of cation
310+ and the a,4-DHT 13 as intermediates (Scheme 3). The
The ortho-substituted 3 was the least reactive of the series
and water in this case decreased the photoreactivity (compare
Fꢀ1 = 0.56 in MeOH and Fꢀ1 = 0.27 in aqueous methanol;
3
efficiency of the 1! 10+ conversion is affected, as one may
expect, by the polarity of the medium. The fate of the cation
310+ depends on the competition between reaction with the
entries 13 and 14). Reduction to 4 was the main process in
neat alcohol, but the presence of water markedly increased
the formation of DHT-derived products 6–9 (entries 13–16).
The above results fully support the contention that DHTs
are smoothly photogenerated from all of the three isomeric
(chlorobenzyl)trimethylsilanes. The main mechanistic fea-
tures are detailed in Scheme 3. Thus, derivatives 1–3 hetero-
litically cleave via the triplet state to afford the triplet phenyl
3
cations 10+–312+ (Scheme 3), just as other chlorobenzenes
having electron-donating substituents[19a] with a convenient
quantum yield in protic solvents (Fꢀ1 0.56–0.90 in MeOH), as
predicted by calculations. Desilylation producing DHTs does
not occur in nonprotic solvents (see Table 1, entry 1 and
Scheme 3, path a), but ion stabilization favors this process in
protic solvents, thereby resulting in DHTs with a structure-
dependent efficiency.
Contrary to the Myers–Saito cyclization, wherein the two
radical centers are formed simultaneously, the radical centers
are formed sequentially with the present approach. Thus,
desilylation competes with other reactions at the phenyl
cation stage (H abstraction from the solvent, more efficient
with EtOH than with MeOH; addition to alkenes). A protic,
nonreducing solvent such as water obviously shifts the
balance toward DHT formation. Solvent-assisted desilylation
of 310+ in a protic solvent is extremely fast as judged from the
competition with ATMS trapping (see below). These general-
izations are valid throughout the series, but the size of the
effect depends on the substrate structure and conditions. In
neat MeOH, desilylation to give DHT competes with reaction
at the cation level, thus resulting in product ratios of 14, 0.54,
and 0.41 for the para-, meta-, and ortho-substituted isomers,
respectively (Table 1). These values increase to 31.5, 4.4, and
1.8 in MeOH/H2O (4:1), but decrease when an efficient trap
Scheme 3. Generation of a,n-didehydrotoluenes 13–15 from silanes 1–
3.
solvent (H abstraction) and desilylation to 13, which is highly
favored in water. The other products result from the loss of
the SiMe3 group as well as that of chlorine, that is, via 13. The
role of the first cationic intermediate 310+ on the way to 13 is
further supported by the concentration-dependent trapping
by ATMS.
The examination was extended to the other isomeric
(chlorobenzyl)silanes. The solvent dependence with the meta-
substituted 2 (quite efficient reaction, Fꢀ1 = 0.90; Table 1,
entry 8) was larger than with 1. Reduction to 4 was the main
process in alcohols, but DHT-derived compounds (6–9)
accounted for one-third to one-fourth of the products in
neat alcohols (entries 8 and 11). The addition of water (which
3
such as ATMS is present for 10+. Isomeric DHTs exhibit
a partially different chemistry, as judged from the different
distribution of the products arising from them (6 to 9). Thus,
with a,4- and a,2-DHTs hydrogen atom abstraction to yield
6,[24] 7, and 9 predominates, whereas with the a,3-DHT
derivative the large proportion of the polar addition product 8
points to nucleophilic addition.[25]
Although this point requires further investigation, it is
tempting to attribute this difference to the fact that the
lowest-energy state of a,3-DHT is a singlet, whereas the
lowest-energy state is a triplet for the other two isomers.[15]
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1 – 5
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3
These are not the final page numbers!