.
Angewandte
Communications
catalyst candidates (Table 1).[14] The reaction of the phospho-
nate 7a with 8 in the presence of the catalyst 1 in toluene as
solvent at À788C afforded the desired addition product 9a
with 29% ee and in 89% yield (Table 1, entry 1). The
(entry 10), therefore 6b was selected as the best catalyst for
additional optimization.
To optimize the reaction conditions further, the solvent
effects were investigated with 6b, and the best result was
obtained in toluene. When the reaction was performed in
CH2Cl2 or THF, a lower ee value was obtained (Table 1,
entries 11 and 12). A similar result was obtained when the
reaction was performed in methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE;
entry 13). Further screening indicated that the reaction
conducted in a mixture of MTBE/PhCH3 (v/v, 1:1) or
MTBE/PhCH3 (v/v, 2:1) offered a better reaction yield with
a moderate enantioselectivity (entries 14 and 15). Adjusting
the catalyst loading demonstrated only a small influence on
the outcome of the enantioselectivity of the reaction. The use
of 5 mol% of 6b led to a slight decrease on enantioselectivity
and yield (entry 16). Increasing the amount of the catalyst
from 10 to 15 mol% did not affect the yield, but resulted in
a higher ee value (entry 17). Acid hydrolysis of the trimethyl-
silyl oxycyanophosphonate 9a can deliver the a-hydroxy-a-
cyanophosphonate 10a in quantitative yield without any
purification (entry 18).
To further improve the reactivity and enantioselectivity,
the effect of additives was investigated. Alcohol additives
were reported to improve the reactivity and enantioselectivity
on cyanosilylation of carbonyl groups.[15] In our investigation,
the beneficial effects of CF3CH2OH, CH3OH, iPrOH, and
tBuOH were observed (Table 2, entries 1–4). After screening
different kinds of aromatic phenolic compounds (entries 5–
10), it was found that p-nitrophenol gave superior results in
terms of reactivity and enantioselectivity (entry 7). When
using 3 mL toluene as the solvent and a prolonged reaction
time of 36 hours, the optimal result was gained (entry 11).
Thus, the optimal reaction conditions for this transformation
were determined to be 0.5 mmol acylphosphonate, 1.2 equiv-
alents of TMSCN, 10 mol% of 6b combined with 10 mol% of
p-nitrophenol in 3 mL toluene at À788C for 36 hours.
Based on the above optimization efforts, the substrate
scope of this reaction was investigated. As shown in Table 3,
Table 1: Screening of the catalysts.[a]
Entry
Catalyst
Solvent
Yield [%][b]
ee [%][c]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3a
3b
4
PhCH3
PhCH3
PhCH3
PhCH3
PhCH3
PhCH3
PhCH3
PhCH3
PhCH3
PhCH3
CH2Cl2
THF
89
85
81
89
85
87
81
80
90
88
88
84
85
94
90
89
90
90
29
À17
À14
À57
À47
À43
45
5a
5b
6a
6b
6b
6b
6b
6b
6b
6b
6b
6b
6b
À69
9
81
10[d]
11
12
13
14
15
16[g]
17[h]
18
72
49
68
71
79
77
70
MTBE
[e]
[f]
MTBE/PhCH3
MTBE/PhCH3
PhCH3
PhCH3
PhCH3
83
81[i]
[a] Unless otherwise specified, all reactions were carried out using diethyl
benzoylphosphonate (7a; 0.5 mmol, 1 equiv) and TMSCN (8; 0.6 mmol,
1.2 equiv) in 2 mL solvent with 10 mol% of the catalyst at À788C for
24 h. [b] Yield of the isolated product 9a after column chromatography.
[c] Determined by HPLC (Chiralcel AS-H) analysis of 9a. [d] The reaction
was performed at À408C for 10 h. [e] v/v=1:1. [f] v/v=2:1. [g] 5 mol%
of catalyst 6b was used. [h] 15 mol% of catalyst 6b was used.
[i] Determined by HPLC (Chiralcel AD-H) analysis of 10a. THF=tetra-
hydrofuran. MTBE = methyl tertbutyl ether.
replacement of 1 with cinchonine 2 as the catalyst resulted
asymmetric induction in the opposite sense with up to 17% ee
and in a similar yield (entry 2). The catalyst 3a could also
catalyze this reaction to provide the desired a-hydroxy
phosphonate 9a in 81% yield, but the enantioselectivity was
rather poor (entry 3). Moreover, the N,N-dimethyl-protected
thiourea catalyst 3b was employed and effectively provided
the silylcyanation product in 89% and 57% ee (entry 4). This
result suggested that a tertiary amine thiourea structure is
essential to effect this reaction. Next, we explored the 3,5-
Table 2: Screening of the additive.[a]
Entry
Additive
Yield [%][b]
ee [%][c]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
CF3CH2OH
CH3OH
iPrOH
tBuOH
2,4-di-tert-butylphenol
2,4-dichlorophenol
4-nitrophenol
3,5-dinitrophenol
1,4-dihydroxybenzene
4-nitrobenzoic acid
4-nitrophenol
97
95
97
98
94
95
94
98
95
95
90
81
82
84
85
79
77
85
82
83
81
91
bis(trifluoromethyl)phenylthiourea
4 and cinchona-based
thioureas 5a and 5b as catalysts, and found that the desired
products were obtained in yields of 81–87% with moderate
ee values of 43–47% (entries 5–7). Consequently, the carbo-
hydrate/cinchona alkaloid thiourea derivatives 6a and 6b
were tested, and a better result (90% yield, 81% ee) was
obtained with 6b (entries 8 and 9). This result indicated that
compared with 5a and 5b, the carbohydrate/cinchona alka-
loid thioureas 6a and 6b had an advantage in the catalytic
asymmetric reaction as a result of the chiral auxiliary. When
the reaction was carried out at À408C using 6b as the catalyst,
a lower enantiomeric excess value of 72% was obtained
9
10
11[d]
[a] Reactions were carried out on a 0.5 mmol scale with 1.2 equiv of
TMSCN in 2 mL of toluene. [b] Yield of isolated 9a after column
chromatography. [c] Determined by HPLC (Chiralcel AD-H) analysis of
10a. [d] The reaction time is 36 h in 3 mL of toluene.
2
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1 – 5
These are not the final page numbers!