400 nm and the cutoff wavelengths were found to be as low
as 460 nm. Accordingly, these molecules maintain almost
full transparency in the visible region. We observed two
distinct absorption bands in the absorption spectra of
SPF-1, SPF-2, and SPF-3: one in the range 280ꢀ320 nm,
corresponding to the πꢀπ* electronic transition of the
spirobifluorene core, and the other in the range 350ꢀ460 nm,
corresponding to the intramolecular charge transfer (ICT)
band, as confirmed by the solvatochromism (Table 1, Sup-
porting Information (SI)).15,16 The ICT bands red-shifted in
the order SPF-1 < SPF-2 ≈ SPF-3. The absorption maxima
for the dicyanovinyl substituted SPF-2 and that of the
4-nitrostyryl analog SPF-3 appear at nearly similar
noted as evidence for the interaction between the upper and
lower parts of the molecule in the ground state.13,19ꢀ23
The thermal stabilities of SPF-1, SPF-2, and SPF-3 are
investigated by thermal gravity analysis (TGA) and differ-
ential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The decomposition
temperature (Td, temperature at which 5% mass loss
occurs during heating), as shown in Figure 2, is 268 °C for
SPF-1, 264 °C for SPF-2, and 235 °C for SPF-3, respec-
tively. Their Td’s are very close to those of commercially
available NLO dyes, such as DR1 (Td = 254 °C), DO3
(Td = 235 °C), and DR19 (Td = 260 °C),24 and consistent
with the appropriate temperature for materials working
and processing.25 The decomposition temperature of chro-
mophore SPF-3 was decreased due to its greater degree of
π-electron conjugation. With extension of the π-conjuga-
tion system comes an increased thermal instability of the
compounds.26 No melting was noticed for chromophores
SPF-1, SPF-2, and SPF-3 in the DSC curves (see SI), and
an obvious exothermic peak due to crystallization of SPF-1
at 240 °C is observed.
λ
max (around 384 nm), thereby suggesting their comparable
electron-withdrawing properties.3 In general, the absorption
spectra of the target compound exhibit a composite char-
acteristic of the acceptor and donor spirobifluorene model
compounds, with negligible interactions among the substi-
tuents in the ground state.6,17 In contrast, the absorption
The TPA cross sections of chromophores SPF-1, SPF-2,
and SPF-3 have been measured by open aperture Z-scan
experiments performed with a femtosecond (fs) laser
Table 1. Linear and Nonlinear Properties of the Chromophores
and Their Thermal Stabilities
ΔVc
βCTμg ꢁ 10ꢀ30
σe
Td
a
b
f
λmax
(nm) (nm) (cmꢀ1
λmax
compds
)
(esu D)d
(GM) (°C)
SPF-1a 338
SPF-1b 370
341
372
376
384
384
503h
243
275
626
626
554
1083
SPF-1
SPT-2
SPF-3
DR1
368
376
378
477g
19138
12429
15134
4340
62949 268
2928
3773
264
235
235i
a In acetonitrile, the absorption data were taken from the first
vibronic peak. b In toluene, the absorption data were taken from
the first vibronic peak. c Solvatochromic shift = 1/λmax(acetonitrile) ꢀ
1/λmax(toluene). d The values were measured by the solvatochromic
method. e The two-photon absorption cross sections. f Determined by
TGA. g Measured in 1,4-dioxane; the λmax value of DR1 is from ref 27.
h Measured in DMF; the λmax value of DR1 is from ref 27. i The Td value
of DR1 is from ref 24.
Figure 2. TGA curves of SPF-1, SPF-2, and SPF-3.
profiles of the SPF compounds (SPF-1, SPF-2, and SPF-3)
are different from those of the model compounds (SPF-1a,
SPF-2a, SPF-3a, and SPF-1b). Careful spectral analyses
(from Figure 1 and Table 1) indicate that the lowest energy
absorption of SPF-1 displays a bathochromic shift and
exhibits a more pronounced solvatochromism as compared
to those of monochromophore model compounds SPF-1a
and SPF-1b. From Figure 1, it can be seen that the lowest
energy absorptions of SPF-2 and SPF-3 in toluene appear at
shorter wavelengths than those of SPF-2a (at 418 nm) and
SPF-3a (at ∼410 nm), respectively. Such a hypsochromic
shift of the lowest energy absorption can be observed in other
spiro-bridged conjugated systems.18,19 These results can be
source. Figure 3 shows the Z-scan data of chromophores
SPF-1, SPF-2, and SPF-3 in THF at the nonoptimized
800 nm wavelength position. The σ-values of SPF-1, SPF-2,
and SPF-3 were 62949 GM, 2928 GM, and 3773 GM
respectively. With respect to the π-attached acceptor
(20) Hohlneicher, G.; Bremm, D.; Wytko, J.; Bley-Escrich, J.;
Gisselbrecht, J.-P.; Gross, M.; Michels, M.; Lex, J.; Vogel, E. Chem.;
Eur. J. 2003, 9, 5636.
(21) King, S. M.; Hintschich, S. I.; Dai, D.; Rothe, C.; Monkman,
A. P. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 18759.
(22) Chiang, C.-L.; Tseng, S.-M.; Chen, C.-T.; Hsu, C.-P.; Shu, C.-F.
Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 248.
(23) Hung, W.-Y; Tsai, T.-C.; Ku, S.-Y.; Chi, L.-C.; Wong, K.-T.
(16) Heredia, D.; Natera, J.; Gervaldo, M.; Otero, L.; Fungo, F.; Lin,
C.-Y.; Wong, K.-Y. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 12.
(17) Fungo, F.; Wong, K.-T.; Ku, S.-Y.; Hung, Y.-Y.; Baed, A. J.
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 5822.
(24) Kuo, W.-J.; Hsiue, G.-H.; Jeng, R.-J. Macromolecules 2001, 34,
2373.
J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 3984.
(25) Moylan, C. R.; Miller, R. D.; Twieg, R. J.; Betterton, K. M.; Lee,
V. Y.; Matray, T. J.; Nguyen, C. Chem. Mater. 1993, 10, 1499.
(26) Cho, M. J.; Choi, D. H.; Sullivanb, P. A.; Akelaitis, A. J. P.;
Dalton, L. R. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2008, 33, 1013.
€
(18) Durr, H.; Ruge, B.; Schmitz, H. Angew. Chem., lnt. Ed. Engl.
1973, 12, 577.
(19) Kao, J.; Radom, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 760.
5284
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 20, 2012