Job/Unit: I20346
/KAP1
Date: 29-06-12 09:37:32
Pages: 19
PtII Diimine-Dithiolate Nonlinear Optical Chromophores
[55] Also reported as R-thiazdt2– ligands in ref.[57–59]
[56] M. C. Aragoni, M. Arca, F. A. Devillanova, F. Isaia, V. Lip-
polis, A. Mancini, L. Pala, A. M. Z. Slawin, J. D. Woollins, In-
org. Chem. 2005, 44, 9610–9612.
[80] P. Politzer, A. A. Fakher, Theor. Chem. Acc. 1998, 99, 83–87.
[81] J. Luo, Z.-Q. Xue, W.-M. Liu, J.-L. Wu, Z.-Q. Yang, J. Phys.
Chem. A 2006, 110, 12005–12009.
[82]
R. S. Mulliken, J. Chem. Phys. 1955, 23, 1833–1840.
[57] S. Eid, M. Guerro, D. Lorcy, Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 8333–
[83] D. C. Young, in: Computational Chemistry: A Practical Guide
for Applying Techniques to the Real World Problems, John
Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001.
8336.
[58] S. Eid, M. Formigué, T. Roisnel, D. Lorcy, Inorg. Chem. 2007,
46, 10647–10654.
[84]
A. E. Reed, R. B. Weinstock, F. Weinhold, J. Chem. Phys. 1985,
[59] S. Eid, T. Roisnel, D. Lorcy, J. Organomet. Chem. 2008, 693,
83, 735–746.
∧
2755–2760.
[85]
As concerns Series 1 (N N = 2,2Ј-bipyridine), the complexes
∧
featuring an R-dmet2– ligand show charges on the S S frag-
[60] N. Tenn, N. Bellec, O. Jeannin, L. Piekara-Sady, P. Auban-
Senzier, J. Íñiguez, E. Canadell, D. Lorcy, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009, 131, 16961–16967.
[61] G. T. Morgan, F. H. Burstall, J. Chem. Soc. 1934, 965–971.
[62] J. V. Rund, Inorg. Chem. 1974, 13, 738–740.
[63] J. Weinstein, M. T. Tierney, E. S. Davies, K. Base, A. A. Rob-
eiro, M. W. Grinstaff, Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 4544–4555.
ment to be slightly more negative than those calculated for
complexes bearing R-edt2– dithiolates 23–25, and, accordingly,
a larger charge separation can be found for these systems. On
∧
the other hand, in complexes of Series 3 (S S = Me-dmet2–),
substituted diimines are found to be more positively charged
than unsubstituted ones, and therefore the charge separation
in the corresponding complexes is larger.
A. Vlcˇek Jr., S. Zálisˇ, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2007, 251, 258–287.
The wavelengths of this transition calculated in CH2Cl2 for
complexes 23–40 are provided in Table S16 in the Supporting
Information. Notably, very good agreement between the ab-
sorption wavelengths calculated at the TD-DFT level and the
Kohn–Sham HOMO–LUMO energy gaps (Table S10) can be
observed (R2 = 0.97).
[64]
Y.-D. Chen, Y.-H. Qin, L.-Y. Zhang, L.-X. Shi, Z.-N. Chen,
Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 1197–1205.
[86]
[87]
[65]
An examination of the structural data clarifies the nature of
the sulfur ligand, which in bis(1,2-dithiolene) complexes has
been long debated. Indeed, C–C and C–S distances have been
individuated as capable of discriminating between the closed-
shell ene-1,2-dithiolate (–S–C=C–S–) and the 1,2-dithioketone
(S=C–C=S) limiting forms of a 1,2-dithiolene ligand. C–C dis-
tances in the range 1.30–1.36 Å and C–S distances in the range
1.71–1.75 Å are in fact typical of C=C double and C–S single
bonds, respectively. The pattern of bond lengths in Table 3
clearly indicates that the R-dmet2– ligands can be considered
1,2-dithiolates in all the complexes characterized structurally,
with C(1)–C(2) and C(1,2)–S(1,2) bond lengths in the range
1.324–1.350 and 1.723–1.764 Å, respectively. Such distances
can be compared with those determined for the complex unit
in the compound (Et4N)2[Zn(Me-dmet)2] (average values 1.333
[88]
P. J. Mendes, A. J. P. Carvalho, J. P. P. Ramalho, THEOCHEM
2009, 900, 110–117.
[89]
[90]
A. L. Fuller, L. A. S. Scott-Hayward, Y. Li, M. Bühl, A. M. Z.
Slawin, J. D. Woollins, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5799–
5802.
[91]
[92]
G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXL-97, University of Göttingen, Ger-
many, 1997; G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXS-97, University of
Göttingen, Germany, 1997.
A. Altomare, M. C. Burla, M. Camalli, G. Cascarano, C. Gia-
covazzo, A. Guagliardi, A. G. G. Moliterni, G. Polidori, R.
Spagna, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1999, 32, 115–119.
and 1.744 Å for C–C and C–S distances, respectively, ref.[57]
)
the only compound featuring an authentic dianionic R-dmet2–
ligand characterized structurally.
[66]
[67]
F. H. Allen, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 2002, 58, 380–388.
An examination of the CSD (v. 5.33; updated to Feb. 2012)
provides to date 29 authentic examples of monomeric
[93]
[94]
[95]
L. J. Farrugia, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1999, 32, 837–838.
F. H. Allen, O. Johnson, G. P. Shields, B. R. Smith, M. Towler,
J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2004, 37, 335–338.
∧
∧
[Pt(N N)(S S)] complexes.
[68]
[69]
G. Matsubayashi, Y. Yamaguchi, T. Tanaka, J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans. 1988, 2215–2219.
P. S. Braterman, J.-I. Song, F. M. Wimmer, S. Wimmer, W.
Kaim, A. Klein, R. D. Peacock, Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 5084–
5088.
[96]
M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria,
M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, V. Barone, B.
Mennucci, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Caricato, X. Li,
H. P. Hratchian, A. F. Izmaylov, J. Bloino, G. Zheng, J. L. Son-
nenberg, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hase-
gawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai,
T. Vreven, J. A. Montgomery Jr., J. E. Peralta, F. Ogliaro, M.
Bearpark, J. J. Heyd, E. Brothers, K. N. Kudin, V. N. Starov-
erov, R. Kobayashi, J. Normand, K. Raghavachari, A. Rendell,
J. C. Burant, S. S. Iyengar, J. Tomasi, M. Cossi, N. Rega, J. M.
Millam, M. Klene, J. E. Knox, J. B. Cross, V. Bakken, C. Ad-
amo, J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R. E. Stratmann, O. Yazyev,
A. J. Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli, J. W. Ochterski, R. L. Mar-
tin, K. Morokuma, V. G. Zakrzewski, G. A. Voth, P. Salvador,
J. J. Dannenberg, S. Dapprich, A. D. Daniels, O. Farkas, J. B.
Foresman, J. V. Ortiz, J. Cioslowski, D. J. Fox, Gaussian 09, rev.
A.02, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2009.
[70]
[71]
L. Yang, F. L. Wimmer, S. Wimmer, J. Zhao, P. S. Bratermian,
J. Organomet. Chem. 1996, 525, 1–8.
The reduction process leading to radical dianionic Pt com-
plexes was detected by CV in dmf solution at –2.071, –2.121,
–2.082, and –2.105 V vs. Fc+/Fc for [Pt(bipy)py2], [Pt(bipy)-
(Me2N-Py)2], [Pt(bipy)en], and [Pt(phen)py2], respectively; see
ref.[69]
I
[72]
Solvent parameters: toluene (0.172), thf (0.494), chloroform
(0.610), dichloromethane (0.765), acetone (0.797), dmf (0.901),
dmso (0.973), acetonitrile (1.000); see ref.[28]
[73]
[74]
W. L. Fleeman, W. B. Connick, Comments Inorg. Chem. 2002,
23, 205–230.
[97]
Notably, the emission profile of complexes is also very similar
to that found for the corresponding dichloro complexes
J. P. Perdew, J. A. Chevary, S. H. Vosko, K. A. Jackson, M. R.
Pederson, D. J. Singh, C. Fiolhais, Phys. Rev. B 1992, 46, 6671–
6687.
∧
[Pt(N N)Cl2], which suggests the 1,2-dithiolato ligand is not
involved in the emissive processes.
A. Schäfer, H. Horn, R. Ahlrichs, J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97,
2571–2577.
[98]
[99]
J. Tao, J. P. Perdew, J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 114102.
J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996,
77, 3865–3868.
[75]
[76]
[77]
C. Adamo, V. Barone, J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 6158–6170.
W. C. Ermler, R. B. Ross, P. A. Christiansen, Int. J. Quantum
Chem. 1991, 40, 829–846.
J. Tomasi, B. Mennucci, R. Cammi, Chem. Rev. 2005, 105,
2999–3094.
[100]
[101]
[102]
J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997,
78, 1396.
T. M. Henderson, A. F. Izmaylov, G. Scalmani, G. E. Scu-
seria, J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 044108–0044117.
M. Ernzerhof, J. P. Perdew, J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 3313–
3321.
[78]
[79]
T. Koopmans, Physica 1934, 1, 104–113.
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 0000, 0–0
© 0000 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjic.org
17