M. Sasidharan, A. Bhaumik / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 328 (2010) 60–67
67
at 573 K for 5 h for the epoxidation of 4-vinyl-1-cyclohexene. The
4. Conclusions
loss of activity may be due to the partial removal of framework tita-
nium either by the action of H2O2 or the bulky reaction products
such as diol and glycol-monomethyl ethers as reported by Davis et
al. [29].
Our experimental results suggested that large-pore titanium sil-
icate Ti- exhibited high catalytic activity in the epoxidation of
cyclic and acyclic double bonds. The reactivity of different bulky
olefins has been governed by steric hindrance and/or conforma-
tional flexibility near the active Ti-sites. Among the various bulky
3.7. Mechanistic aspects
olefins investigated using Ti- catalyst, the epoxidation efficiency
∼
imental results reveal that primary epoxy products both cyclic-
and acyclic-derivatives undergo consecutive secondary reactions
assisted by either weak Brönsted acid sites of Ti- or acidic titanium
hydroperoxo complex [30,31]. Thus, the acyclic or terminal epox-
ides produce aldehyde and ketone by isomerization; whereas diol
and glycol-monomethyl ethers are formed by the nucleophilic ring
opening reaction with H2O and CH3OH molecules, respectively. In
addition, terminal epoxide also undergoes further epoxidation of
double bond in the cyclohexene-ring to produce diepoxide, which
is the major product among the “Ring epoxidation products”. From
the observed product distribution it is obvious that the stability
of diepoxide is quite higher compared to monoepoxide as seen
from negligible amount of polyol or polymethoxylated product
formation.
follows the order: terminal –C C– > cyclic ring –C C– bicyclic
=
–C C– > allylic C–H. Epoxidation of various hexene and hexadiene
isomers indicated that internal alkenes smoothly epoxidize than
the terminal alkenes. The mesoporous Ti-MCM-41 showed similar
selectivity as that of Ti- but with lower activity in spite of its neg-
ligible diffusion limitation. The difference in the activity between
Ti- and Ti-MCM-41 is attributed to the intrinsic nature of local
Ti-site and crystalline framework of Ti-. Thus the present investi-
gation, for olefins containing more than one double bonds (reaction
sites) at different position suggested that the reactivity is ultimately
governed by the steric hindrance, geometry and/or conformational
flexibility of the interacting molecules at the active Ti-active sites.
References
[1] C. Perego, A. Carati, P. Ingallina, M.A. Mantegazza, G. Bellussi, Appl. Catal. A:
Gen. 221 (2001) 63.
The observed reactivity of compounds with cyclic- and acyclic
double bonds over Ti- is however in contrast with the literature,
i.e.–C C– in the cyclic ring should be more reactive than the ter-
minal –C C– bond. Furthermore the epoxidation of other similar
substrates also showed high reactivity towards terminal double
bonds. The observed reactivity can be explained by considering
epoxidation and the kind of interaction between such active inter-
mediate with 4-vinyl-1-cyclohexene is illustrated in Scheme 2. The
interaction of H2O2 with Ti-site produces five coordinated species
(titanium hydroperoxo complex) [30–32], which could be stabi-
lized due to the formation of 5-membered ring. This not only makes
the hydroperoxo complex Brönsted acidic but also the peroxo-
with 4-vinyl-1-cyclohexene or other substrates play a crucial role
in determining the reactivity of a particular double bond. Thus, the
interaction of terminal –C C– with active Ti-intermediate (Struc-
ture I, Scheme 2) undergoes less strain as it contains no substituents
structures i.e. chair and boat (boat form of cyclohexene is less
stable than the chair form) forms makes the interaction more dif-
ficult (Structure II and III, Scheme 2). The observed low reactivity
vis-à-vis selectivity for cyclic ring oxidation at lower temperature
(Fig. 3) may be the consequence of conformational as well as steric
resistance towards the accessibility at the active Ti-sites. Thus, the
observed product distribution can be explained by considering the
interaction of a molecule as a whole entity instead as ‘terminal’
or ‘cyclic’ double bonds. Therefore, the epoxidation of terminal
–C C– occurs prominently unless it is highly strained by many
substituents as in the case of 4-ethylidene-1-norbornene with exo
double bond. The same explanation can also hold good for geomet-
rical isomers, where the interaction of cis-isomer is more effective
than the trans-isomer.
[2] S. Mukherjee, M. Nandi, K. Sarkar, A. Bhaumik, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 301 (2009)
114.
[3] R.A. Sheldon, J. Dakka, Catal. Today 19 (1994) 215.
[4] A. Bhaumik, T. Tatsumi, Chem. Commun. (1998) 463.
[5] P. Selvam, S.K. Mohapatra, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 73 (2004) 137.
[6] W.B. Fan, R.-G. Duan, Y. Yokoi, P. Wu, Y. Kubota, T. Tatsumi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
130 (2008) 10150.
[7] P. Serna, L.A. Baumes, M. Moliner, A. Corma, J. Catal. 258 (2008) 25.
[8] G.A. Eimer, I. Diaz, E. Sastre, S.G. Casuscelli, M.E. Crivello, E.R. Herrero, J. Perez-
Pariente, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 343 (2008) 77.
[9] P. Chammingkwan, W.F. Hoelderich, T. Mongkhonsi, P. Kanchanawanichakul,
Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 352 (2009) 1.
[10] S.C. Laha, R. Kumar, J. Catal. 204 (2001) 64.
[11] J. Iglesias, J.A. Melero, J. Sainz-Pardo, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 291 (2008) 75.
[12] M.G. Clerici, P. Ingallina, J. Catal. 140 (1993) 71.
[13] A. Bhaumik, R. Kumar, P. Ratnasamy, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 84 A (1994) 1883.
[14] J.C. Van der Waal, M.S. Rigutto, H. van, Bekkum, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 167 (1998)
331.
[15] A. Bhaumik, T. Tatsumi, J. Catal. 182 (1999) 349.
[16] T. Blasco, M.A. Camblor, A. Corma, P. Esteve, J.M. Guil, A. Martinez, J.A. Perdigon-
Melon, S. Valencia, J. Phys. Chem. B 102 (1998) 75.
[17] A. Thangaraj, R. Kumar, S.P. Mirajkar, P. Ratnasamy, J. Catal. 130 (1990) 1.
[18] J.S. Reddy, R. Kumar, P. Ratnasamy, Appl. Catal. 58 (1990) L1.
[19] M. Sasidharan, P. Wu, T. Tatsumi, J. Catal. 205 (2002) 332.
[20] P.T. Tanev, M. Chibwe, T.J. Pinnavaia, Nature 368 (1994) 321.
[21] D. Chandra, S.C. Laha, A. Bhaumik, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 342 (2008) 29.
[22] F.Y. Lee, L. Lv, F. Su, T. Liu, Y. Liu, C.H. Sow, X.S. Zhao, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater.
124 (2009) 36.
[23] A. Corma, M.A. Camblor, P. Esteve, A. Martinez, J. Perez-Pariente, J. Catal. 145
(1994) 151.
[24] A. Tuel, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 117 (1998) 159.
[25] S. Liu, J. Xiao, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 270 (2007) 1.
[26] C.E. Ramachandran, H. Du, Y.J. Kim, M.C. Kung, R.Q. Snurr, L.J. Broadbelt, J. Catal.
253 (2008) 148.
[27] W. Fan, P. Wu, T. Tatsumi, J. Catal. 256 (2008) 62.
[28] R.D. Oldroyd, J.M. Thomas, T. Maschmeyer, P.A. MacFaul, D.W. Snelgrove, K.U.
Ingold, D.D.M. Wayner, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 35 (1996) 2787.
[29] L.J. Davis, P. McMorn, D. Bethell, P.C. Bulman Page, G. King, G.E. Hancock, G.J.
Hutchings, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 165 (2001) 243.
[30] A. Bhaumik, P. Kumar, R. Kumar, Catal. Lett. 40 (1996) 47.
[31] Y. Goa, P. Wu, T. Tatsumi, J. Phys. Chem. B 108 (2004) 8401.
[32] U. Wilkenhoner, G. Langhendries, F.V. Laar, G.V. Baron, D.W. Gammon, P.A.
Jacobs, E.V. Steen, J. Catal. 203 (2001) 201.