X.-Y. Zhang et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 55 (2014) 5462–5464
5463
Table 2
O
N
O
N
Substrate scope of the 2-alkyl azaarenes and aldehydea
HSO4
SO3H
HSO4
H
H
H
OH
OH
NO2 OH
[C3SO3Hnhm][HSO4]
[Hnhm][HSO4]
O2N
NC
N
N
N
N
Cl
N
O2N
N
NH
H2PO4
3b, 80%
3a, 92%
3c,
83%
COOH
[Hmim][H2PO4]
PyAcCl
OH
OH
OH
N
N
NH
N
N
HSO4
CH2COOH
OHC
NC
3e, 78%
3d, 92%
3f,
86%
N
Cl
[Et3NH][HSO4]
MAcImCl
OH
OH
OH
Scheme 1. Structure of acid ionic liquids.
N
N
N
N
O2N
O2N
3g,
O2N
80%
3h,
76%
3i,
87%
Table 1
N
N
Optimization of the reaction conditionsa
F
N
OH
OH
OH
OH
N
CHO
IL, solvent
100ഒ, 24h
N
O2N
3k,
74%
O2N
O2N
3j,
3l,
73%
+
95%
O2N
N
2a
O2N
1a
3a
OH
OH
OH
O2N
N
Entry Acid ionic liquids (IL)
Solvent
T (°C) Yield 3a (%)
N
N
NO2
NO2
3m,
3p,
70%
1
[C3SO3Hnhm][HSO4]
(1.0 equiv)
H2O
100
13
69%
N
3n,
90%
O2N
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
[Hnhm][HSO4] (1.0 equiv)
[Hmim][H2PO4] (1.0 equiv)
PyAcCl (1.0 equiv)
[Et3NH][HSO4] (1.0 equiv)
MAcImCl (1.0 equiv)
[Hmim][H2PO4] (2.0 equiv)
[Hmim][H2PO4] (1.0 equiv)
H2O
H2O
H2O
H2O
H2O
H2O
H2O/
dioxane
H2O/
dioxane
H2O/
dioxane
H2O/
dioxane
H2O/
dioxane
H2O/
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
25
61
32
41
36
62
92
Br
OH
OH
OH
N
N
3r
O2N
3o,
O2N
93%
NC
HO
3q,
65%
no reaction
N
HO
HO
HO
N
CO2Et
O2N
N
9
10
11
12
13
[Hmim][H2PO4] (1.0 equiv)
[Hmim][H2PO4] (1.0 equiv)
[Hmim][H2PO4] (1.0 equiv)
[Hmim][H2PO4] (1.0 equiv)
[Hmim][H2PO4] (0.5 equiv)
110
90
91
N
N
O2N
85
3u, 76%
3t, 75%
3v, 80%
3s, 67%
100
100
100
89b
92c
82
a
Unless otherwise stated, all reactions were carried out with 1 (0.25 mmol), 2
(0.75 mmol), and [Hmim] H2PO4 (1 equiv) in H2O (0.5 ml) and dioxane (0.5 ml) at
100 °C for 24 h. Isolated yields.
dioxane
a
Unless otherwise stated, all reactions were carried out with 1a (0.25 mmol), 2a
intact, which provides a useful handle for further chemical manip-
ulations (Table 2, 3f). Furthermore, heteroaromatic aldehyde
(Table 2, 3s) and activated aliphatic aldehyde (Table 2, 3u) also
reacted well with 2,6-lutidine and moderate yields were obtained.
To further evaluate the scope of the methodology, the application
of other azaarenes to this reaction was investigated. Substituted
pyridines such as 2,4,6-trimethylpyridine reacted with p-nitro-
benzaldehyde smoothly under the optimized reaction conditions
(Table 2, 3g). When 2-methylpyridine was subjected to this reac-
tion, slightly lower yields were realized (Table 2, 3t) than those
of 2,4,6-trimethylpyridine and 2,6-lutidine. The reason may come
from the less opportunities to react with 4-nitrobenzaldehyde.
However, when 2,5-dimethyl pyrazine and 2-methylpyrazine were
used, only moderate yields were obtained (Table 2, 3k–3l). Besides
2-methylpyridine derivatives, 2-methylquinoline, 2,6-dimethyl-
quinoline, and 2-methylquinoxaline derivatives can also react with
aldehyde in moderate to high yields (Table 2, 3h–3i, 3m–3p, 3q,
3v). Substituents including nitro, halogen groups in phenyl rings
of quinoline were well tolerated under reaction conditions (Table 2,
3j, 3p–3o), which also provide a useful handle for further chemical
manipulations. 2-methyl-8-nitroquinoline afforded lower yield
than those of 6-fluoroquinaldine and 6-bromoquinaldine and the
reason may come from the hindrance of the nitro group. Generally,
substituted 2-methylquinoline with the electron-withdrawing
group attached to benzene rings afforded higher yields than the
(0.75 mmol), IL (1 equiv), H2O/dioxane (0.5 ml/0.5 ml) reacted at 100 °C for 24 h.
b
Reacted for 36 h.
Reacted for 48 h.
c
(Table 1, entry 12) to get higher yields, but the yields of the reac-
tion still remained almost unaffected. When the amount of the
ionic liquids was reduced to 0.5 equiv, the yields of the product
decreased to 82%. Thus the optimized reaction conditions for this
reaction were acid ionic liquids [Hmim][H2PO4] (1 equiv) in H2O/
dioxane at 100 °C for 24 h.
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we set out to
explore the substrate scope of the reaction. As shown in Table 2,
substituted benzaldehydes with the electron-withdrawing group
attached to benzene rings, such as 4-nitrobenzaldehyde, 2-nitro-
benzaldehyde, and 3-nitrobenzaldehyde could react with 2,6-luti-
dine smoothly to generate the corresponding products in good to
excellent yields. Because of the smaller hindrance of 4-nitrobenzal-
dehyde compared with its analogues 3-nitrobenzaldehyde and 2-
nitrobenzaldehyde, 4-nitrobenzaldehyde gave a higher yield than
that of 2-nitrobenzaldehyde and 3-nitrobenzaldehyde (Table 2,
3a–3c). Additionally, aldehyde with the moderate electron-with-
drawing group such as the cyanl group could also react with 2,6-
lutidine to produce the products in moderate to good yields
(Table 2, 3d–3e). When 1,4-phthalaldehyde was used, only one for-
myl group took part in this reaction and the other one remained