lead to aplidiopsamine A, via a BischlerꢀNapieralski-like
cyclization and dehydration sequence.5
Scheme 2. Biomimetic Total Synthesis of Aplidiopsamine (6)
Scheme 1. Proposed Biosynthesis of Aplidiopsamine (6)
Therefore, we elected to pursue a biomimetic approach
for the first total synthesis of aplidiopsamine A and
attempt the condensation of a suitable synthetic surrogate
of 9 and pyrrole 11 to access 12. Interestingly, Correia
synthesized 11, en route to marinoquinolines AꢀC and E,
from advanced materials in five synthetic steps in 47.5%
overall yield.4 We envisioned a more expedited route and
were gratified that a two-step sequence from commercial
reagents produced 11. In the event, aniline 14 smoothly
underwent a Suzuki coupling with boronate ester 13 to
deliver TIPS protected pyrrole 15, which upon basic
hydrolysis generated 11 in 96% yield over the two steps
(Scheme 2).6 Acylation with R-bromo acetyl bromide
provided 16 in 86% yield. Selective N-alkylation at the
9- versus 7-position of adenine to afford 12 was achieved
via a hard deprotonation with NaH in 56% yield. Softer
approaches with cesium carbonate resulted in 2:1 regio-
siomeric mixtures and poor conversion. With 12 in hand,
we were now posied to perform the biomimetic condensa-
tion via a BischlerꢀNapieralski-type cyclization. Classical
variants of this cyclization/dehydration sequence7 employ
TFA, POCl3, or other Lewis acids; however, in the pre-
sence of the adenine moiety, these conditions either failed
or led to intractable gums or poor conversion (less than
10% yields). Ultimately, we found that 4 M HCl/dioxanes
under microwave irradiation (130 °C, 10 min) facilitated
the reaction sequence to deliver, for the first time, apli-
diopsamine A in 45% yield.6 Overall, the biomimetic
synthesis of 6 required five steps and proceeded in 20.8%
overall yield, an ideal route to prepare unnatural analogs.
The synthetic 6 exhibited physical and spectroscopic data
identical to those of the natural aplidiopsamine A.5,6
With large quantities of 6 in hand, we elected to further
profile 6 against a larger panel of discrete molecular targets
of therapeutic significance beyond antimalarial activity, as
6 was shown to not be cytotoxic. Indeed, we have pre-
viously elucidated intriguing activities for a number of
marine alkloids at CNS targets with unprecedented selec-
tivities among highly conserved receptor families.8ꢀ11 As
6 possesses the basic pharmacophore (H-bond donor/
acceptor triad) of many known ATP-competitive kinase
inhibitors,12 we profiled synthetic 6 in a KINOMEscan
panel against 97 kinases (both wild-type and mutants) at a
10 μM concentration.6,13 Despite the presence of a known
pharmacophore,12 6 was uniformly inactive; however, this
can also be viewed as possessing very clean ancillary
pharmacology. In parallel, we also profiled 6 in a Lead
Profiling screen (a radio ligand binding panel at a 10 μM
concentration) against 68 GPCRs, ion channels, and
transporters.14 Once again, 6 displayed very clean ancillary
pharmacology, possessing activity at only two targets:
5-HT2B (62% @ 10 μM) and PDE4/Rolipram (74% @
10μM). Whenfullconcentrationꢀresponse curves(CRCs)
were obtained for 6, the5-HT2B Ki was weak at ∼10 μM, but
6 proved to be a moderately potent PDE4 inhibitor (Ki =
1.2 μM, IC50 = 3.3 μM).6,14 PDE4 is a high profile target
for antidepressant, antipsychotic, and neuroprotective drug
(8) Kennedy, J. P.; Brogan, J. T.; Lindsley, C. W. J. Nat. Prod. 2008,
71, 1783–1788.
(9) Aldrich, L. N.; Stoops, S. L.; Crews, B. C.; Marnett, L. M.;
Lindsley, C. W. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 5207–5211.
(10) Brogan, J. T.; Stoops, S. L.; Crews, B. C.; Marnett, L. M.;
Lindsley, C. W. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2011, 2, 633–639.
(11) Brogan, J. T.; Stoops, S. L.; Lindsley, C. W. ACS Chem.
Neurosci. 2012, 3, 658–664.
(12) Lewis, J. A.; Lebois, E. P.; Lindsley, C. W. Curr. Opin. Chem.
Biol. 2008, 12, 269–279.
(13) For information of the KIONMEscan panel assay, see: www.
discoverx.com
com.
(15) Pages, L.; Gavalda, A.; Lehner, M. D. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat.
2009, 19, 1501–1519.
(6) See Supporting Information for full details.
(7) (a) Kennedy, J. P.; Breininger, M. L.; Lindsley, C. W. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2009, 50, 7067–7069. (b) Capilla, A. S.; Romero, M.; Pujol, M. D.;
Caignard, D. H.; Renard, P. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 8297–8303.
(16) Burgin, A. B.; Magnusson, O. T.; Witte, P.; Bjornsson, J. M.;
Thorsteindottir, S.; Hage, T.; Kiselyov, A. S.; Stewart, L. J.; Gurnet,
M. E. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 63–70.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 22, 2012
5809