R. Bai et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 6490–6493
6493
(40 mg/kg), ( )-XJP (80 mg/kg), (+)-XJP (80 mg/kg) and (ꢀ)-XJP
References and notes
(80 mg/kg), the blood pressure and heart rate of SHRs were de-
tected from 0 to 24 h. The evaluation results showed that (ꢀ)-XJP
exhibits more potent antihypertensive activity than ( )-XJP signif-
icantly, and the antihypertensive activity of ( )-XJP is stronger than
that of (+)-XJP, which demonstrate that (ꢀ)-XJP plays a more
important role in the antihypertensive effect of ( )-XJP (Fig. 3).
The diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) of SHRs treated with (ꢀ)-XJP
was reduced by almost 30% at 6 h, which is obviously superior to
that of control drug captopril. Meanwhile, the maximum antihy-
pertensive effect on the systolic arterial pressure (SAP) of (ꢀ)-XJP
is also somewhat more effective than that of captopril. Further-
more, ( )-XJP and its enantiomers produce no observable alter-
ation in the basal heart rate at these doses.
In summary, (ꢀ)-XJP and (+)-XJP was first obtained by chiral
resolution, and CD calculations as well as chiral synthesis were em-
ployed to investigate the absolute configuration. It has been dem-
onstrated that the absolute configuration of (+)-XJP is S-configured
and the absolute configuration of (ꢀ)-XJP is R-configured. Antihy-
pertensive effects of S-(+)-XJP and R-(ꢀ)-XJP in vivo were also eval-
uated. The results proved that ( )-XJP is a racemates with isomers
possessing similar pharmacodynamic effects, but of different po-
tency, and the R-(ꢀ)-XJP is more potent than S-(+)-XJP. Further
investigation involving with R-(ꢀ)-XJP and the mechanism are cur-
rently in progress and will be reported in due course.
1. Sun, Q.; Olesik, S. V. J. Chromatogr. B. 2000, 745, 159.
2. Matsuoka, Y.; Kanda, N.; Lee, Y. M.; Higuchi, A. J. Membrance. Sci. 2006, 280,
116.
3. Qian, H.; Huang, W. L.; Wu, X. M.; Zhang, H. B.; Zhou, J. P.; Ye, W. C. Chin. Chem.
Lett. 2007, 18, 1227.
4. Qian, H.; Huang, W. L.; Yao, G. L.; Ge, L.; Wu, X. M. J. China. Pharm. Univ. 2009,
40, 524.
5. Fu, R.; Chen, Z.; Wang, Q. J.; Guo, Q. L.; Xu, J. Y.; Wu, X. M. Atherosclerosis 2011,
219, 40.
6. Liu, J.; Ren, H.; Xu, J. Y.; Bai, R. R.; Yan, Q.; Huang, W. L.; Wu, X. M.; Fu, J. H.;
Wang, Q. J. W, Q.; Fu, R Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1822, 2009, 19.
7. Fu, R.; Yan, T. H.; Wang, Q. J.; Guo, Q. L.; Yao, H. Q.; Wu, X. M.; Li, Y. Vasc.
Pharmacol. (Available, online 17 May 2012).
8. Noyori, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 2002, 41.
9. Sudani, M.; Yoshio, T.; Eiichi, Y.; Tadashi, K. Tetrahedron. Lett. 1981, 22, 4253.
10. Tang, K.; Song, L.; Liu, Y. B.; Pan, Y.; Jiang, X. Y. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 158, 411.
11. Frisch, M.J., Trucks, G.W., Schlegel, H.B., Scuseria, G.E., Robb, M.A., Cheeseman,
J.R., Scalmani, G., Barone, V., Mennucci, B., Petersson, G.A., Nakatsuji, H.,
Caricato, M., Li, X., Hratchian, H.P., Izmaylov, A.F., Bloino, J., Zheng, G.,
Sonnenberg, J.L., Hada, M., Ehara, M., Toyota, K., Fukuda, R., Hasegawa, J.,
Ishida, M., Nakajima, T., Honda, Y., Kitao, O., Nakai, H., Vreven, T., Montgomery,
J.A.Jr., Peralta, J.E., Ogliaro, F., Bearpark, M., Heyd, J.J., Brothers, E., Kudin, K.N.,
Staroverov, V.N., Keith, T., Kobayashi, R., Normand, J., Raghavachari, K., Rendell,
A., Burant, J.C., Iyengar, S.S., Tomasi, J., Cossi, M., Rega, N., Millam, J.M., Klene,
M., Knox, J.E., Cross, J.B., Bakken, V., Adamo, C., Jaramillo, J., Gomperts, R.,
Stratmann, R.E., Yazyev, O., Austin, A.J., Cammi, R., Pomelli, C., Ochterski, J.W.,
Martin, R.L., Morokuma, K., Zakrzewski, V.G., Voth, G.A., Salvador, P.,
Dannenberg, J.J., Dapprich, S., Daniels, A.D., Farkas, O., Foresman, J.B., Ortiz,
J.V., Cioslowski, J., and Fox, D.J., 2010. Gaussian 09, Revision B.01, Gaussian, Inc.,
Wallingford CT.
12. Bringmann, G.; Maksimenka, K.; Mutanyatta-Comar, J.; Knauer, M.; Bruhn,
Torsten Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 9810.
13. Analytical data for S-(+)-XJP: ½a D20
+104.93 (c, 0.209, MeOH); mp 163–164 °C
ꢁ
Acknowledgments
(dec.); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): d (ppm) 1.29 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H, –CH3),
4.19 (q, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H, –CH–), 4.68 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H, –CH2–), 4.97 (d,
J = 15.9 Hz, 1H, –CH2–), 6.82 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.31 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H,
Ar-H), 8.90 (1H, –OH), 10.40 (1H, -OH); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): d (ppm)
194.8, 150.8, 139.8, 130.3, 121.7, 119.0, 114.6, 76.8, 62.6, 15.9. HRMS (ESI)
calcd for C10H11O4 [M+H]+: 195.0652, found 195.0653. Analytical data for R-
This study was financially supported by grant from ‘Eleventh
Five-Year’ Major Innovation Projects for New Drug Candidates
(No. 2009ZX09103-128), Project for Research and Innovation of
Graduates in Colleges and Universities of Jiangsu Province
(CXZZ11-0798), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Uni-
versities (JKY2011027) and Project Program of State Key Labora-
tory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University
(JKGQ201115). Thanks for Daicel Chiral Technologies (China) Co.,
Ltd.
(ꢀ)-XJP:
½
a 2D0
ꢁ
ꢀ103.68 (c, 0.500, MeOH); mp 163–164 °C (dec.); 1H NMR
(DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): d (ppm) 1.26 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H, –CH3), 4.19 (q, J = 6.7 Hz,
1H, –CH–), 4.68 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H, –CH2–), 4.92 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H, –CH2–), 6.82
(d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.31 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.92 (1H, –OH), 10.39 (1H,
–OH); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): d (ppm) 194.8, 150.8, 139.8, 130.3, 121.7,
119.0, 114.6, 76.8, 62.6, 15.9. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C10H11O4[M+H]+: 195.0652,
found 195.0650.