solubilization, the biological applications of HBCs have
remained largely unexplored, especially in fluorescence
imaging.7 In this area, the problem of photobleaching for
fluorescent agents has become a great obstacle. Although
some antiphotobleaching fluorescent agents such as quan-
tum dots have been successfully developed, the potential
toxicity of heavy metals has greatly limited their biomedi-
cal applications. Searching for fluorescence imaging agents
with high stability and little toxicity is still a challenge.8
nanographene aqueous nanopaticles can be prepared for
fluorescence imaging with little cytotoxicity. Moreover,
the 3D nanographene displayed good antiphotobleaching
ability compared to other commercial fluorescent agents
such as LysoTracker Green. These results encourage further
studies of our 3D nanographene for biomedical applications
like graphene.13
Synthesis of the 3D nanographenes is outlined in Scheme 1.
Starting from triiodotriptycene 2,14 its palladium-catalyzed
Sonogashira coupling reaction with tert-butylphenylace-
tylene in the presence of Pd(PPh3)4, CuI, and NEt3 af-
forded triethynylation product 3 in good yield, which
was then subjected to a DielsꢀAlder reaction with tetra-
tert-butylphenylcyclopentadienone15 to result in the poly-
phenylene dendritic precursor 4 in 43% yield. Oxidative
cyclization of 4 with FeCl3/MeNO2 in CH2Cl2 resulted in
the formation of 3D nanographene 1 as a pale yellow solid
in 87% yield.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 3D Nanographene 1
In the 1H NMR spectrum of 1, two sharp singlet signals
appeared at δ 8.26 and 8.91 ppm for the two methenyl
protons (Ha and Hb) of the triptycene scaffold, which were
assigned by 2D CꢀH COSY analysis (Figure S7). The
formation of 3D nanographenes was furthermore con-
firmed by the MALDI-TOF mass spectrum.16 As shown
in Figure S8, the mass spectrum of 1 revealed a peak at m/z
2429 for Mþ. Comparison of the MALDI-TOF spectrum
ofthe 3Dnanographene withthatofits precursor 4 (Figure
S9) indicated the elimination of 36 hydrogen atoms during
the Scholl oxidative condensation reactions occurred,
which is consistent with the differences between the mole-
cular formulas of 3D nanographene (C188H170) and its pre-
cursor 4 (C188H206). The infrared vibrational spectra showed
more simple absorption peaks in this range of the aromatic
CꢀH out-of-plane bending vibration (650ꢀ950 cmꢀ1) of 1
compared with 4, which afforded further evidence of the
formation of 3D nanographene (Figure S10).4b The ab-
sorption and emission spectra of the 3D nanographene
were obtained in dichloromethane solution. When 1 was
excited at 364 nm (ε = 3.05 ꢁ 105 Mꢀ1 cmꢀ1, 298 K), the
emission wavelength at 470, 490, and 500 nm with a
fluorescent quantum yield of 12.8% was observed
(Figures S11 and S12).
Triptycenes, with unique three-dimensional rigid frame-
works, have more applications in materials science9,10 and
molecular machines.11 Recently, we12 utilized the useful
building blocks to construct novel hosts and subsequently
develop a series of new supramolecular systems. Herein,
we describe the synthesis of triptycene derived three-
dimensional nanographene 1, which bears three HBC moi-
eties in the triptycene three-dimensional scaffold. With the
characteristic of intrinsic fluorescence, the three-dimensional
(6) (a) Mori, S.; Nagata, M.; Nakahata, Y.; Yasuta, K.; Goto, R.;
Kimura, M.; Taya, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 4054. (b) Long,
T. M.; Swager, T. M. Adv. Mater. 2001, 13, 601.
€
(7) Yin, M.; Shen, J.; Pisula., W.; Liang, M.; Zhi, L.; Mullen, K.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 14618.
To direct the biological application of our 3D nanogra-
phene, water solubilization is necessary. Adding the THF
solution of 1 to a water containing poly(ethylene glycol)-
block-poly(propylyene glycol)-block-poly(ethylene glycol)
(pluronicF68) nonionic surfactant could prepare the aque-
ous nanoparticles of 1 after removing THF by rotary
evaporation (Figure 1a).17 For the aqueous nanoparticles
(8) Some recent examples of 2D nanographene/nanographene oxide
for fluorescence imaging with antiphotobleaching property: (a) Li,
J.-L.; Bao, H.-C.; Hou, X.-L.; Sun, L.; Wang, X.-G.; Gu, M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 52, 1830. (b) Pan, D.; Guo, L.; Zhang, J.; Xi, C.;
Xue, Q.; Huang, H.; Li, J.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, W.; Chen, Z.; Li, Z.; Wu, M.
J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 3314.
(9) For recent reviews, see: (a) Swager, T. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008,
41, 1181. (b) Chong, J. H.; MacLachlan, M. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38,
3301 and references therein.
(10) For recent examples, see: (a) Zhang, C.; Liu, Y.; Li, B.; Tan, B.;
Chen, C.-F.; Xu, H.-B.; Yang, X.-L. ACS Macro. Lett. 2012, 1, 190.
(b) VanVeller, B.; Robinson, D.; Swager, T. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2012, 51, 1182. (c) Mastalerz, M.; Schneider, M. W.; Oppel, I. M.; Presly,
O. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 1046.
(11) Kelly, T. R.; Cai, X.; Damkaci, F.; Panicker, S. B.; Tu, B.;
Bushell, S. M.; Cornella, I.; Piggott, M. J.; Salives, R.; Cavero, M.;
Zhao, Y.; Jasmin, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 376.
(13) (a) Robison, J. T.; Tabakman, S. M.; Liang, Y.; Wang, H.;
Casalongue, H. S.; Vinh, D.; Dai, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6825.
(b) Liu, Z.; Robinson, J. T.; Sun, X.; Dai, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 10876.
(14) Zhang, C.; Chen, C.-F. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 6626.
(15) Draper, S. M.; Gregg, D. J.; Madathil, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 3486.
€
(16) Tomovic, Z.; Watson, M. D.; Mullen, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2004, 43, 755.
(17) (a) Xiao, J.; Yin, Z.; Li, H.; Zhang, Q.; Boey, F.; Zhang, H.;
Zhang, Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 6926. (b) Liu, Q.; Yang, T.;
Feng, W.; Li, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 5390.
(12) (a) Zhu, X.-Z.; Chen, C.-F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13158.
(b) Zong, Q.-S.; Zhang, C.; Chen, C.-F. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1859. (c)
Zhang, C.; Chen, C.-F. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 3880. (d) Zhang, C.;
Chen, C.-F. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 9339. (e) Zhang, C.; Chen, C.-F.
CrystEngComm 2010, 12, 3255. (f) Chen, C.-F. Chem. Commun. 2011,
47, 1674.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX