Song et al.
NOTE
-
1
(R), 21.3 min (S) at 0.7 mL/min flow rate. The racemic
nitrile 2 was synthesized from 2-methylpropane-1,3-diol
according the procedure described in reference [3].
2872, 1728, 1630, 1214, 1151, 736 cm ; MS (ESI) m/z:
288.2 ([M+Na]+); HRMS (ESI) calcd for C14H19N-
ONa+ 288.1206, found 288.1213.
(R)-Methyl 5-(benzyloxy)-4-methyl-2-(((methyl-
sulfonyl)-oxy)imino)pentanoate (5)
Results and Discussion
Beckmann-type reaction was hence chosen to
cleave C(1)—C(2) bond (Scheme 1, type II, Beckmann
fragmentation).[4] Ketoxime 3 was easily prepared by
treating α-keto ester with NH2OH•HCl in ethanol and
several typical conditions of Beckmann reaction were
examined thereafter (Table 1). As expected, treatment
of ketoxime 3 in acidic medium generated nitrile 2 as
the only identifiable compound in moderate yield (Table
1, Entries 1—3).
To a well-stirred solution of crude 3 (0.40 mol) in
dry CH2Cl2/Et3N (400 mL/220 mL) was added MsCl
(55 g, 0.48 mol, 1.2 equiv.) under a ice-water bath. Af-
ter stirring for 90 min at room temperature, the mixture
was quenched by adding water (500 mL). The resulting
biphasic system was separated and the aqueous phase
was extracted with CH2Cl2 (300 mL×3), and the com-
bined organic phase was washed with brine, dried over
Na2SO4. Concentration under reduced pressure afforded
crude 5 (136.4 g) as a dark red liquid which was used in
next step without further purification. Analytic sample
was obtained after flash column chromatography on
silica gel. Rf=0.8 (silica gel, EtOAc∶hexane: 1∶4);
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.34—7.24 (m, 5H),
4.41 (d, J=1.7 Hz, 2H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 3.39 (dd, J=9.3,
4.6 Hz, 1H), 3.24 (t, J=8.9 Hz, 1H), 3.14 (s, 3H), 2.76
(dd, J=12.8, 8.5 Hz, 1H), 2.68 (dd, J=12.8, 6.2 Hz,
1H), 2.34—2.22 (m, 1H), 0.96 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H); 13C
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 162.64, 160.77, 138.15,
128.37 (2C), 127.61, 127.56 (2C), 75.35, 72.92, 53.13,
36.81, 32.43, 32.15, 17.28; IR (KBr) v: 3030, 2958,
Scheme 1 Transformations of ketoxime 3
OH
type II cleavage
N
NH2OH
keto ester
BnO
OMe
EtOH, NaOAc
(1)
O
3
type I cleavage
BnO
NHR
(Beckmann rearrangement)
table 1
OCO2Me
N
N
BnO
BnO
OMe
-
1
2
2937, 2859, 1735, 1623, 1217, 1186, 1096, 523 cm ;
MS (ESI) m/z: 365.9 ([M+Na]+); HRMS (MALDI)
calcd for C15H21NO6SNa+ 366.0994, found 366.0982.
4
O
(Beckmann fragmentation)
Table 1 Conditions for transforming ketoxime 3 into nitrile 2
(R)-4-(Benzyloxy)-3-methylbutanenitrile (2)
Entry
Condition
SOCl2 or POCl3, CH2Cl2, RT to reflux, 5 h Complex
Resultsa
To a well-stirred solution of sodium methoxide (22.6
g, 0.42 mol, 1.05 equiv.) in MeOH (400 mL) was added
crude 5 dropwise at -10 ℃ (ice/EtOH bath). A white
deposition (MsONa) was formed and the reaction com-
pleted after 90 min. The mixture was filtered and
washed with ethyl acetate, and then the filtrate was
concentrated and diluted with water (200 mL). The re-
sulting mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (300
mL×4), and the combined organic phase was washed
with brine, dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated. Distil-
lation under reduced pressure (141 ℃, 8 mmHg) gave
nitrile 2 (63.2 g, 84%, 98.5% ee by HPLC analysis) as a
colorless liquid. Rf=0.8 (silica gel, EtOAc∶hexane:
1
2
3
4
Ac2O, 4 mol/L HCl, EtOH, reflux, 6 h
12 mol/L HCl, MeOH, reflux, 5 h
64% 2
55% 2
C4F9SO2F, DBU, CH2Cl2, 0 ℃, 30 min
45% 2+41% 4
a Isolated yield.
The reaction condition was further screened and the
balance of mass was finally realized when 3 was treated
with C4F9SO2F in the presence of DBU in dry CH2Cl2 at
0 ℃, providing nitrile 2 and methyl carbonate 4 in
comparable yield (Entry 4). The generation of 4 indi-
cated that an external nucleophilic attack at ester group
[C(1)] might greatly facilitate the decarboxylation and
the cleavage of N—O bond during the reaction, hence
provided us definite clue for further optimization.
As outlined in Scheme 2, ketoxime 3 was trans-
formed into stable methanesulfonate 5, and the latter
was treated with stoichiometric amount of sodium
methoxide in dry methanol under an ice-ethanol bath for
90 min to furnish the desired nitrile 2 smoothly in ex-
cellent yield (84%—86% from α-keto ester 1) and high
enantiomeric excess (98.5% for every batch, inherited
from 1). Although the scope of this reaction was not
expanded yet, the effectiveness and robustness of our
procedure were tested by running the reaction at 100 g
1
1∶5); b.p. 282 ℃; [α]2D8 +30.3 (c 1.01, CHCl3); H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.39—7.27 (m, 5H), 4.52 (s,
2H), 3.47 (dd, J=9.4, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 3.31 (dd, J=9.2, 8.0
Hz, 1H), 2.51 (dd, J=16.7, 5.3 Hz, 1H), 2.39 (dd, J=
16.7, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.24—2.11 (m, 1H), 1.09 (d, J=6.9
Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 138.14,
128.50, 128.37, 127.92, 127.79, 127.66, 118.75, 73.24,
31.14, 21.37, 16.26; IR (film) ν: 3088, 3031, 2964, 2929,
-
1
2860, 2245, 1731, 1604, 1206, 739 cm ; MS (ESI) m/z:
212.1 ([M+Na]+). Anal. calcd for C12H15NO: C 76.2,
H 7.94, N 7.41; found C 76.00, H 8.09, N 7.32; HPLC
(chiral) Chiralpak AS-H at 23 ℃, λ =214 nm,
hexane∶isopropanol: 98∶2, retention times 19.6 min
2
© 2012 SIOC, CAS, Shanghai, & WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chin. J. Chem. 2012, XX, 1—3