Page 3 of 3
ChemComm
60 16.311(3) Å, b = 26.899(5) Å, c = 13.696(2) Å, α = 90.00, β =
were split with similar separations between the waves. Several
109.885(4), γ = 90.00, V = 5651.1(17) Å3, Z = 2, T = 173 K, MoKα =
0.71073, 1.75 < θ < 27.83, 13185 reflections measured, 6059 unique
reflections, R1 = 0.0887, wR2 = 0.2348, GoF = 0.958.
years ago, the splitting value of the first oxidation steps was
considered as a measure of the electronic communication
between two conjugated porphyrins.15 The values reported
here can be compared with the 80 mV splitting reported by
Higuchi for an ethylenyl linked NiOEP dimer.16 Typical
splitting values for the first oxidation potentials in porphyrin
conjugated dimers are respectively 80 mV, 240 mV, or 400
mV for the ethylenyl and ethynyl linked dimers or for Osuka’s
5
65 Notes and references
1
K. Ogawa, Y. Kobuke, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 4070.
A. Satake, M. Fujita, Y. Kurimoto, Y. Kobuke, Chem.
Commun., 2009, 1231. Y. Kuramochi, A. S. D. Sandanayaka,
A. Satake, Y. Araki, K. Ogawa, O. Ito, Y. Kobuke, Chem. Eur.
J., 2009, 15, 2317.
10 triply fused diporphyrins.15-17
70
75
2
3
V. Rauch, J. A. Wytko, M. Takahashi, Y. Kikkawa, M.
Kanesato, J. Weiss, Org Lett., 2012, 14, 1998. M. Koepf, J. A.
Wytko, J.-P. Bucher, J. Weiss, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130,
9994.
T. P. Umile, D. Wang, J. T. Groves, Inorg. Chem., 2011, 50,
10353. R. De Paula, M. M. Q. Simoes, M. G. P. M. S. Neves,
J. A. S. Cavaleiro, J. Mol. Cat. A : Chem., 2011, 345, 1. L. R.
Milgrom, P. J. F. Dempsey, G. Yahioglu, Tetrahedron, 1994,
52, 9877.
Fc/Fc+
15
20
25
80
4
5
J. Yamamoto, T. Shimizu, S. Yamaguchi, N. Aratani, H.
Shinokubo, A. Osuka, J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines, 2011,
15, 534.
S. Richeter, A. Hadj-Aissa, C. Taffin, A. van der Lee, D.
Leclercq, Chem. Commun., 2007, 1359. J.-F. Lefebvre, D.
Leclercq, J.-P. Gisselbrecht, S. Richeter, Eur. J. Org. Chem.,
2010, 1912. J.-F. Lefebvre, M. Lo, D. Leclercq,, S. Richeter,
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 2976. M. Lo, J.-F. Lefebvre, D.
Leclercq, A. van der Lee, S. Richeter, Org. Lett., 2011, 13,
3110.
85
Figure 2. Cyclic voltammetry of 5a and deconvoluted oxidation curve.
90
6
See for example: S. Richeter, C. Jeandon, R. Ruppert, H. J.
Callot, Chem. Commun., 2002, 266. S. Richeter, C. Jeandon,
J.-P. Gisselbrecht, R. Ruppert, H. J. Callot, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2002, 124, 6168. S. Richeter, C. Jeandon, J.-P. Gisselbrecht,
R. Graff, R. Ruppert, H. J. Callot, Inorg. Chem., 2004, 43,
251. Y. Matano, K. Matsumoto, Y. Nakao, H. Uno, S. Sasaki,
H. Imahori, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 4588. S.
Yamaguchi, T. Katoh, H. Shinokubo, A. Osuka, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2008, 130, 14440.
At this stage, intramolecular coulombic effects (between two
radical cations and then between two dications) seems the
30 most reasonable explanation for the clear splitting observed
here (the shortest distance between the two porphyrins, C-
meso to C-meso is 6.85 Å). However, in porphyrin dimers
with similar but even shorter palladium(II) linkages, no
splitting was observed.5 Extremely important splitting values,
35 as high as 240 mV, were observed for cofacial
nickelporphyrins, but the intermediate formation of the
neutral-radical cation dimer was invoked for this high value.18
Further studies of similar compounds containing identical or
different connections as well as calculations might be needed
40 to fully understand the interactions between the two
macrocycles.
In conclusion, the modern Ullmann coupling reaction allowed
the introduction of an imidazolyl group at the meso positions
of porphyrins. These derivatives were used to generate new
45 NHC carbenic species and palladium(II) linked porphyrin
dimers. Preliminary tests using the same coupling reaction
twice with 5,15-dihalogenated porphyrins led to meso-
bis(imidazolyl)porphyrins. Work in progress should lead to
larger porphyrin scaffolds.
95
7
K. B. Fields, J. V. Ruppel, N. L. Snyder, X. P. Zhang, in the
Handbook of Porphyrin Science, K. M. Kadish, K. M. Smith,
R. Guilard Eds, World Scientific (Singapore), 2010, Vol.3,
367.
100
105
110
115
120
125
8
9
K. M. Smith, G. H. Barnett, B. Evans, Z. Martynenko, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1979, 101, 5953.
M. C. Balaban, C. Chappaz-Gillot, G. Canard, O. Fuhr, C.
Roussel, T. S. Balaban, Tetrahedron, 2009, 65, 3733. K. I.
Yamashita, K. Kataoka, M. S. Asano, K.-I. Sugiura, Org. Lett.,
2012, 14, 190.
10 F. Ullmann, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges., 1903, 36, 2382. F.
Ullmann, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges., 1904, 37, 853.
11 F. Mounier, M. Taillefer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2008, 47,
3096; F. Mounier, M. Taillefer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2009,
48, 6954; E. Speretto, G. P. M. van Klink, G. Van Koten, J. G.
de Vries, Dalton Trans., 2010, 39, 10338.
12 H. Zhang, Q. Cai, D. Ma, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 5164.
13 L. Li, L. Zhu, D. Chen, X. Hu, R. Wang, Eur. J. Org. Chem.,
2011, 2692.
14 A. Jutand, J. Pytkowicz, S. Roland, P. Mangeney, Pure Appl.
Chem., 2010, 82, 1393.
15 V. S. Y. Lin, S. G. DiMagno, M. J. Therien, Science, 1994,
264, 1105.
50
Institut de Chimie, UMR 7177 du CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, 1 rue
Blaise Pascal, 67008 Strasbourg cedex, France. Tel: ++(33) 368851700;
16 H. Higuchi, T. Maeda, K. Miyabayashi, M. Miyake, K.
Yamamoto, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 3097.
17 A. Tsuda, H. Furuta, A. Osuka, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123,
10304.
† Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: [detailed
55 experimental part
: preparation and characterization of the new
compounds, additional electrochemical data]. CCDC reference number
898396. See DOI: 10.1039/b000000x/
‡ Crystal data for 5b. From CH2Cl2/EtOH, C104H84N12Ni2O2Pd, M =
2011.45, 0.40×0.28×0.05 red prisms, monoclinic, space group P 21/c, a =
18 G. Pognon, C. Boudon, K. J. Schenk, M. Bonin, B. Bach, J.
Weiss, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 3488.
This journal is © TheRoyal Society of Chemistry [year]
Journal Name, [year], [vol], 00–00 | 3