compounds.7 Inthiscontext, phosphine-promotedtandem
annulation reaction between dinucleophiles and unsatu-
rated Michael acceptors represents an attractive protocol
for synthesis of carbo- and heterocycles.8 In 2002, Lu and
co-workers8a first developed a PPh3-catalyzed tandem
umpolung addition/intramolecular Michael cyclization
of electron-deficient allenes or alkynoates with dinucleo-
philes to readily generate functionalized dihydrofurans,
piperazines, morpholines, and diazepanes in a [2 þ n] (n =
3, 4, 5) fashion (Scheme 1, eq a). Interestingly, with similar
substrates, distinct tandem cyclization modes of [1 þ n]
(n = 4, 5) via a double Michael sequence have been
subsequently realized by Kwon8bꢀd through the catalysis
of bisphosphines like 1,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)propane
(DPPP) or electron-rich PMe3, providing easy access to
various five- and six-membered heterocycles (Scheme 1,
eq b). Very recently, an elegant work from Tong’s group8e
unveiled that R-acetoxymethyl allenoates could undergo
phosphine-catalyzed formal [4 þ n] (n = 1, 2) annulations
with dinucleophiles to produce cyclopentenes and tetra-
hydropyridazines (Scheme 1, eq c). All of the above
pioneering studies have unveiled the versatility of the
electron-deficient allenes and alkynes in the phosphine-
catalyzed tandem cyclizations with dinucleophiles.
In the past decade, another class of so-called modified
allylic derivatives such as halides, acetates, and tert-butyl
carbonates, which could be easily prepared from Moritaꢀ
BaylisꢀHillman (MBH) adducts, have proven to be ap-
pealing substrates in an array of phosphine-catalyzed
annulations.9 The pioneering and important reports by
Lu and others have disclosed that such modified allylic
derivatives could be readily used asC3 and C1 synthons in a
number of phosphine-catalyzed [3 þ 2] and [1 þ 4] annu-
lations with various electrophiles including electron-deficient
alkenes and imines. Apart from their uses in the annula-
tion reactions, the allylic derivatives were also reported by
Krische et al. to undertake allylic alkylation reactions
with different nucleophiles under the phosphine catalysis,
producing functionalized products bearing an electrophilic
terminal alkene subunit.10
Scheme 1. Phosphine-Catalyzed Tandem Annulations with
Dinucleophiles
Considering the above diverse reactivity of the allylic
derivatives and the fact that nucleophilic phosphines are
capable of triggering Michael addition reactions between
activated alkenes and pronucleophiles,11 we envisaged that,
under the mediation of phosphines, dinucleophiles and
the modified allylic derivatives such as tert-butyl MBH
carbonates could undertake a tandem allylic alkylationꢀ
intramolecular Michael cyclization process, thereby leading
to new entries for carbo- and heterocycles.12 Following
this strategy, we investigated a phosphine-triggered tandem
[3 þ 4] annulation reaction between MBH carbonates 1 and
1,4-diheteroatom dinucleophiles 2 to generate saturated
seven-membered 1,4-heterocycles (Scheme 1, eq d). Herein
we report the preliminary results.
Enantiopure β-amino alcohol 2a derived from L-valine
was chosen as a dinucleophile to evaluate our proposal.
To our delight, a model reaction of MBH carbonate 1a
(0.6 mmol) and dinucleophile 2a (0.5 mmol) under the
catalysis of PPh3 (20 mol %) in refluxing acetonitrile
produced the expected 1,4-oxazepane 3a in 46% isolated
yield and 7:1 dr after 48 h (Table 1, entry 1). A brief survey
on the model reaction conditions was further carried out to
improve the annulation efficiency.
(7) For leading reviews on phosphine-catalyzed annulations, see: (a)
Lu, X.; Zhang, C.; Xu, Z. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 535. (b) Methot,
J. L.; Roush, W. R. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1035. (c) Ye, L.-W.;
Zhou, J.; Tang, Y. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1140. (d) Cowen, B. J.;
Miller, S. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 3102. (e) Marinetti, A.; Voituriez,
A. Synlett 2010, 174.
(8) (a) Lu, C.; Lu, X. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4677. (b) Sriramurthy,
V.; Barcan, G. A.; Kwon, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12928.
(c) Sriramurthy, V.; Kwon, O. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1084. (d) Szeto, J.;
Sriramurthy, V.; Kwon, O. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 5420. (e) Zhang, Q.;
Yang, L.; Tong, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 2550.
A series of nucleophilic phosphines were examined
(Table 1, entries 1ꢀ10). Triarylphosphines bearing electron-
donating groups on phenyl rings showed relatively better
catalytic activity with P(4-CH3C6H4)3 offering the best yield
of 3a (entry 2). Relatively electron-poor triarylphosphines
such as P(4-FC6H4)3 and P(4-CF3C6H4)3 were, however,
completely ineffective for the annulation reaction. Electron-
richer alkylarylphosphines such as Ph2PMe, PhPMe2, and
tributylphosphine were less effective, only giving 3a in modest
(9) For selected examples of [3 þ 2] annulations, see: (a) Du, Y.; Lu,
X.; Zhang, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1035. (b) Du, Y.; Feng, J.;
Lu, X. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1987. (c) Feng, J.; Lu, X.; Kong, A.; Han, X.
Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 6035. (d) Zheng, S.; Lu, X. Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
4481. (e) Ye, L.-W.; Sun, X.-L.; Wang, Q.-G.; Tang, Y. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5951. (f) Zhou, R.; Wang, J.; Song, H.; He, Z. Org. Lett.
2011, 13, 580. (g) Deng, H.-P.; Wei, Y.; Shi, M. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3348.
(h) Tan, B.; Candeias, N. R.; Barbas, C. F., III. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011,
133, 4672. (i) Zhong, F.; Han, X.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Y. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2011, 50, 7837. For examples of [1 þ 4] annulations, see: (j) Chen, Z.;
Zhang, J. Chem.;Asian J. 2010, 5, 1542. (k) Xie, P.; Huang, Y.; Chen,
R. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3768. (l) Tian, J.; Zhou, R.; Sun, H.; Song, H.; He,
Z. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 2374. (m) Zhang, X.-N.; Deng, H.-P.; Huang,
L.; Wei, Y.; Shi, M. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 8664.
(11) (a) Stewart, I. C.; Bergman, R. G.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 8696. (b) Reference 8d.
(12) A sole example of phosphine-catalyzed [3 þ 3] annulation of
MBH carbonates with C,C-dinucleophiles was reported previously.
Zheng, S.; Lu, X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 4532.
(10) For selected examples, see: (a) Cho, C.-W.; Kong, J.-R.;
Krische, M. J. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1337. (b) Cho, C.-W.; Krische, M. J.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6689. (c) Park, H.; Cho, C.-W.; Krische,
M. J. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7892. (d) Jiang, Y.-Q.; Shi, Y.-L.; Shi, M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 7202.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX