A. Satheshkumar, K.P. Elango / Dyes and Pigments 96 (2013) 364e371
371
ꢀ
H-bond (1.792 A) between H7 of the thiourea NeH and O1 of the
same time, the practical application of this receptor was demon-
strated by the visual selective detection of fluoride ion in tooth-
paste samples.
quinone carbonyl group (Fig. 11) might also have contributed to the
increase in D
E value after the addition of Fꢁ ions to 1. This may be
due to the fact that Fꢁ ions have to expend energy to overcome the
H7/O1 H-bonding to form H7/Fꢁ H-bond in other words this is
the energy required for the structural reorganization to form the 1-
Appendix A. Supplementary material
ꢁ complex. This is supported by the weakening of H7/O1 H-bond
Supplementary data (characterization data and 1H and 13C NMR, spectra
of all the products) associated with this article can be found, in the online
F
(1.810 A) in the 1-Fꢁ complex.
ꢀ
In the case of receptor 2, the HOMO is concentrated on the NeH
moiety and the LUMO is concentrated on the quinone ring. The ICT
transition exhibited on free 2 (at 468 nm) in the electronic spec-
References
trum is due to the HOMO to LUMO excitation. The energy gap (DE)
[1] Martinez-mane, San cenon F. Fluorogenic Chem Rev 2003;103:4419e76.
[2] Krik KL. Biochemistry of the halogens and inorganic halides. New York:
Plenum Press; 1991. p. 58.
[3] Kleerkoper. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1998;27:441e52.
[4] Geddes CD. Meas Sci Technol 2001;12:R53e8.
between these two frontier molecular orbital is 2.140 eV which is
slightly less than that in 1 and hence the ICT transition occurs at
a relatively higher wavelength in 2 than in 1. This difference in
wavelength (40 nm) may be due to the fact that, in the case of 2, the
receptor unit (NeH) is directly attached to the signaling unit
(quinone) thus favoring relatively easy ICT. In contrast to receptor 1,
in the case of the 2-Fꢁ complex the LUMO is concentrated on the
quinone ring and of course the HOMO resides dominantly on the
NeH moiety. This in the case of receptor 2, addition of Fꢁ ions to the
NeH moiety through H-bonding decreased the HOMOeLUMO
[5] Kissa E. Clin Chem 1987;33:253e5.
[6] Sukai C, Tuntualni T. Chem Soc Rev 2003;32:192e202.
[7] Gunnalaugasson T, Kruger PE, Jensen P, Tierney J, Li HDP, Hussery GM. J Org
Chem 2005;70:10875e6.
[8] Ghosh K, Adikari S. Tetrahedron Lett 2006;47:8165e9.
[9] Ren J, Zhu W, Tian H. Talanta 2008;75:760e4.
[10] Jose DA, Kumar DK, Ganguly B, Das A. Org Lett 2004;6:3445e8.
[11] Jimeeenez D, Martinez-Manez R, Sanenon F, Soto J. Tetrahedron Lett 2002;43:
2823e5.
[12] Lee C, Lee DH, Hong JI. Tetrahedron Lett 2001;42:8665e8.
[13] Lee KH, Lee HY, Lee DH. Tetrahedron Lett 2001;42:5447e9.
[14] Duke RM, Gunnalaugasson T. Tetrahedron Lett 2007;48:8043e7.
[15] Gunnalaugasson T, Glynn M, Tocci GM, Kruger PE, Pfeffer FM. Chem Rev 2006;
250:3094e117.
[16] Quinlan E, Matthews SE, Gunnlaugasson T. Tetrahedron Lett 2006;47:9333e8.
[17] Shao J, Lin H, Lin HK. Talanta 2008;75:1015e20.
[18] Evans LS, Gale PA, Light ME, Qyesada R. Chem Commun 2006:965e7.
[19] Sessler JL, Camiolo S, Gale PA. Coord Chem Rev 2003;240:17e55.
[20] Gale PA, Twyman J, Handlin CI, Sessler JL. Chem Commun 1999:1851e2.
[21] Liu Xiu-Ming, Li Ya-Ping, Song Wei-Chao, Zhao Qiang, Bu Xian-He. Talanta
2012;97:111e7.
[22] Liu Xiu-Ming, Zhao Qiang, Song Wei-Chao, Bu Xian-He. Chem Eur J 2012;18:
2806e11.
[23] Pang Xiaojun, Wu Yunkou, Fan Jiangli, Tian Maozhong, Han Keli. J Org Chem
2005;70:10524e31.
energy gap (
D
E ¼ 1.803 eV, Fig. 13) (makes NeH/Fꢁ moiety
a better donor) and red shifted the ICT to 540 nm (DlICT ¼ 72 nm)
and consequently makes the colorimetric recognition of Fꢁ ions
energetically easier. Such an observed large red shift in lICT, after
complexation with Fꢁ ions renders the compound 2, a novel
receptor wherein the receptor unit is directly attached to the
signaling unit.
Furthermore, in both the receptor 1 and 2, the Mulliken charge
on the four NHs increased significantly after complexation with
fluoride ions indicating formation of NeH/Fꢁ H-bond. This is
because Fꢁ ions will abstract the H-atom of the NeH moiety as Hþ
to form the H-bond. This fact is well supported by the results of 1H
NMR titration experiments. Interestingly it is observed that the
results of the theoretical study corroborate well with the experi-
mental findings.
[24] Quinlan E, Matthews SE, Gunnlaugsson T. J Org Chem 2007;72:7497e503.
[25] Evans AJ, Mathews SE, Cowley AR, Beer PD. Dalton Trans 2003:4644e50.
[26] Kato R, Nishizawa S, Hayashita T, Teramae N. Tetrahedron Lett 2001;42:
5053e6.
[27] Kumar Vinod, Kausik MP, Srivastava AK, pratap Ajay, Thiruvenkatam V, Guru
Row TN. Anal Chim Acta 2010;66:77e84.
6. Conclusion
[28] Yen YP, Ho KW. Tetrahedron Lett 2006;47:7357e61.
[29] Dzolic Z, Cametti M, Cort AD, Mandolini L, Zinic M. Chem Commun 2007:
3535e7.
[30] Sun Mei-Zhen, Wu Fang- Ying, Wu Yu- Mei, Liu Wen-Ming. Spectrochim Acta
A 2008;71:814e7.
We have designed, synthesized and characterized two new
thiourea based sensors for fluoride ions with different signaling
units. The results of UVeVis, fluorescence and 1H NMR studies
indicated that the receptors 1 and 2 showed high selectivity for
fluoride ion detection over other anions such as Clꢁ, Brꢁ, Iꢁ, OAcꢁ,
NOꢁ3 , H2POꢁ4 , and CNꢁ. As the receptor 2 possesses a highly electron
deficient signaling unit directly attached to the receptor unit with
enhanced Fꢁ ion sensing, it works well for the selective sensing of
Fꢁ ions in an aqueous medium. Hence it is no doubt that the
receptor 2 is novel. The results obtained from the ab initio DFT
calculations agree well with the experimental observations. At the
[31] Cho EJ, Yea HM, Ryu BJ, Jeon HA, Nam KC. Bull Korean Chem Soc 2006;27:
1967e8.
[32] Duke RM, Gunnlaugsson T. Tetrahedron Lett 2011;52:1503e5.
[33] Ganesh K, Balraj C, Elango KP. Spectrochim Acta A 2011;79:1621e9.
[34] Dinng F, Zhao G, Huang J, Sun Ying, Zhang Li. Eur J Med Chem 2009;44:
4083e9.
[35] You Jung-Min, Jeong Haesang, Seo Hyungran, Jeon Seungwon. Sens Actuators
B 2010;146:160e4.
[36] Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, et al.
Gaussian 03W revision D.01. Wallingford CT: Gaussian, Inc; 2004.