intermolecular Michael addition/cycloketalization.3 This
cascade cyclization may also provide quick and efficient
access to other cis-fused polycyclic pyrones for potential
medicinal applications.
silyloxy substituent. Ketone 6 could be readily synthesized
via R-methylenation and methyllithium opening of
γ-butyrolactone 7.6 The 1,3-diketone 8 could be prepared
by oxidation of MoritaꢀBaylisꢀHillman7 adducts of 4-
((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-cyclopent-2-enone (9)8 and
optically pure aldehyde 10. At the outset of our synthetic
studies, it is not clear whether 4-hydroxy-6-methyl-2-pyrone
would undergo 1,4-addition to R,β-unsaturated ketones
since it has been well established that it readily reacts
with R,β-unsaturated aldehyde in a 1,2-addition fashion
in the presence of secondary amine or other catalysts.9 There-
fore, we wished to determine if 1,4-addition of 4-hydroxy-
6-methyl-2-pyrone to R,β-unsaturated ketones would occur
followed by cycloketalization. To this end, three racemic
R-methylene lactones (11aꢀ11c) were prepared as model
compounds for the cascade intermolecular Michael addi-
tion/cycloketalization processes (Scheme 2).
Our synthetic strategy (Scheme 1) was primarily inspired
by the biosynthetic hypothesis of tenuipyrone. Although
the corresponding biosynthesis of penicipyrone (1) has not
been proposed yet, we believe that a similar cascade
intermolecular Michael addition/cycloketalization could
be applied to build up the tricyclic pyrone. Therefore, as
outlined in Scheme 1, we envisioned that cascade inter-
molecular Michael addition of 4-hydroxy-6-methyl-2-pyr-
one (3),4 followed by cycloketalization (or spiroketaliza-
tion),5 would provide the tricyclic and tetracyclic pyrones
found in penicipyrone and tenuipyrone, respectively, when
R,β-unsaturated ketones 6 and 8 were employed as the
corresponding Michael acceptors. The relative stereoche-
mistry of the newly formed chiral centers in penicipyrone
might arise by stereoinduction from ketone 6 through
formation of thermodynamically more stable cis-fused
tricyclic 6,6,5-ketal with the central pyran ring form-
ing anti- to the propenyl side chain to minimize the steric
hindrance. A similar stereoinduction might operate for the
new chiral centers in the cascade intermolecular Michael
Scheme 2. Amberlyst-15 Promoted Cascade Intermolecular
Michael Addition/Cycloketalization
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analyses
As shown in Scheme 2, treatment of the R-methylene
lactone with methyllithium afforded the cascade cycliza-
tion precursors: γ-(or δ-) hydroxyl-R,β-unsaturated ke-
tones, in good yields (50ꢀ71%), which were unconseque-
ntially in equilibrium with the less favored lactol as in-
1
dicated by H NMR. The key cascade intermolecular
Michael addition/cycloketalization process was then expl-
ored by addition of the individual ketone to the 4-hydroxy-
6-methyl-2-pyrone (3) in the presence of Amberlyst-15. To
our delight, the cascade cyclization proceeded smoothly
to give cis-fused tricyclic ketals (12aꢀ12c), correspond-
ing to the penicipyrone core structure, in excellent yields
(72ꢀ88%) with exclusive regioselectivity. The relative
addition/spiroketalization for the total synthesis of tenuipyrone
(2), with addition of 4-hydroxy-2-pyrone anti- to the
(6) Parsons, P. J.; Lacrouts, P.; Buss, A. D. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1995, 437.
(7) For a review, see: Basavaiah, D.; Reddy, B. S.; Badsara, S. S.
(3) For recent advances in the biomimetic total synthesis of natural
products, see: (a) Biomimetic Organic Synthesis; Poupon, E., Nay, B.,
Eds.; Wiley-VCH Verlag & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2011. (b) De la
Torre, M. C.; Sierra, M. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 160. (c)
Bulger, P. G.; Bagal, S. K.; Marquez, R. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2008, 25, 254.
For cascade reactions involving Michael addition in the total synthesis
of natural products, see selected reviews: (d) Nicolaou, K. C.; Edmonds,
D. J.; Bulger, P. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7134. (e) Grondal,
C.; Jeanty, M.; Enders, D. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 167.
Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 5447.
(8) (a) Paquette, L. A.; Heidelbaugh, T. M. Org. Synth. 1996, 73, 44.
(b) Curran, T. T.; Hay, D. A.; Koegel, C. P.; Evans, J. C. Tetrahedron
1997, 53, 1983.
(9) (a) Ikawa, M.; Stahmann, M. A.; Link, K. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
~
1944, 66, 902. (b) de March, P.; Roca, J. L.; Moreno-Manas, M.;
Pleixats, R. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1984, 21, 1369. (c) de March, P.;
~
Moreno-Manas, M.; Casado, J.; Pleixats, R.; Roca, J. L.; Trius, A.
(4) For representative Michael addition of 1,3-dicarbonyl com-
pounds, see: (a) Halland, N.; Hansen, T.; Jørgensen, K. A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4955. (b) Halland, N.; Aburel, P. S.; Jørgensen,
K. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1272. (c) Rueping, M.; Merino,
E.; Sugiono, E. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 2127.
(5) For a representative review, see: Perron, F.; Albizati, K. F. Chem.
Rev. 1989, 89, 1617.
J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1984, 21, 85. (d) Hsung, R. P.; Shen, H. C.;
Douglas, C. J.; Morgan, C. D.; Degen, S. J.; Yao, L. J. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 690. (e) Shen, H. C.; Wang, J.; Cole, K. P.; McLaughlin, M. J.;
Morgan, C. D.; Douglas, C. J.; Hsung, R. P.; Coverdale, H. A.;
Gerasyuto, A. I.; Hahn, J. M.; Liu, J.; Wei, L.-L.; Sklenicka, H. M.;
Zehnder, L. R.; Zificsak, C. A. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 1729. (f) Hsung,
R. P.; Kurdyumov, A. V.; Sydorenko, N. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 23.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 1, 2013
7