ChemComm
Communication
G. R. L. Cousins, J. K. M. Sanders and J. F. Stoddart, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 898; (i) J.-M. Lehn and A. V. Eliseev, Science, 2001,
291, 2331; ( j) B. Klekota and B. L. Miller, Trends Biotechnol., 1999,
17, 205; (k) J.-M. Lehn, Chem.–Eur. J., 1999, 5, 2455.
no changes with the pH, supporting our proposal for the conforma-
tional behaviour of [1a–1a]. Moreover, the CD spectra of [1a–1a] at
different pH values showed significantly different signatures both
at 220 nm and 254 nm, also implying a different conformation of
the macrocycle at acidic and neutral pH. Interestingly, the 1H NMR
and the CD spectra of [1a–1a] acquired at pH 7.5 in a saline
medium displayed no differences with respect to those acquired
without the salt (ESI†). This observation implies the prevalence of
very similar conformations at different ionic strengths.
2 J.-M. Lehn, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007, 36, 151.
3 (a) J. N. H. Reek and S. Otto, Dynamic Combinatorial Chemistry,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2010; (b) B. L. Miller, Dynamic
Combinatorial Chemistry in Drug Discovery, Bioorganic Chemistry and
Materials Science, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2010.
4 (a) S. Otto, Acc. Chem. Res., 2012, DOI: 10.1021/ar200246j;
(b) R. A. R. Hunt and S. Otto, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 847;
(c) G. von Kiedrowski, S. Otto and P. Herdewijn, J. Syst. Chem.,
2010, 1, 1; (d) B. C. Gibb, Nat. Chem., 2009, 1, 17; (e) J. J. P. Peyralans
and S. Otto, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2009, 13, 705; ( f ) N. Wagner and
G. Ashkenasy, Chem.–Eur. J., 2009, 15, 1765; (g) R. F. Ludlow and
S. Otto, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37, 101.
5 E. T. Kool and M. L. Waters, Nat. Chem. Biol., 2007, 3, 70.
6 D. L. Valentine, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 2007, 5, 316.
7 (a) S. Paul, S. K. Bag, S. Das, E. T. Harvill and C. Dutta, Genome Biol.,
2008, 9, R70; (b) D. Madern, C. Ebel and G. Zaccai, Extremophiles,
2000, 4, 91.
Having characterized the salt-induced amplification trends in
the DCL formed by 1a + 1b + 1c, we wondered about the
performance of a more complex mixture, by the introduction of
an additional building block. We evaluated the presence of
another acidic derivative (1d derived from Asp, Scheme 1).
In this case, the salt produced the amplification of all the species
assembling the building blocks with Glu and Asp side chains.
Thus, the specific salt-induced amplification of the [1a–1a] dimer
was somehow palliated by the amplification of the other anionic
dimers [1d–1d] and [1a–1d], in a clearly competitive process.
The salt-induced amplification factors increased in the order
[1a–1a] o [1a–1d] o [1d–1d], implying a better salt-adaptation
of the Asp derivatives. This evolutionary trend has been also
reported for the halophilic proteins and was related to the smaller
solvent-accessible surface for the shortest side chain (Asp), which
permits a more compact folding.10 Molecular models of the
anionic macrocyclic dimers [1a–1d] and [1d–1d] showed a folding
stabilized by carboxylate-amide intramolecular H-bonding
patterns similar to those found in [1a–1a]. Therefore, similar
salt effects should be expected for all the tetraanionic macro-
cycles. The corresponding CPK areas follow the trend [1a–1a] >
[1a–1d] > [1d–1d], and thus, the salt-adaptation of the members
of this DCL also increases as the accessible area decreases.
In conclusion, the increase of the ionic strength within simple
DCLs of macrocyclic pseudopeptides induces the amplification of
the members concentrating a large number of acidic side chains.
This behaviour has a remarkable resemblance with the natural
evolution of the proteins of halophilic organisms for surviving in
hypersaline media. Our findings show the utility of DCLs for the
experimental modelling of the molecular evolutionary trends
observed in nature, with foreseen implications in the prebiotic
chemistry and in the understanding of the origin of life.20
This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy
and Competitiveness (MINECO, CTQ2009-14366-C02-02 project).
J.A. thanks CSIC for personal financial support (JAE-predoc
fellowship). We thank Prof. Sijbren Otto for providing us with
the DCLSim software.
8 S. Fukuchi, K. Yoshimune, M. Wakayama, M. Moriguchi and
K. Nishikawa, J. Mol. Biol., 2003, 327, 347.
9 (a) J. Qvist, G. Ortega, X. Tadeo, O. Millet and B. Halle, J. Phys. Chem.
B, 2012, 116, 3436; (b) C. Ebel, L. Costenaro, M. Pascu, P. Faou,
B. Kernel, F. Proust-De Martin and G. Zaccai, Biochemistry, 2002,
41, 13234.
´
´
´
˜
10 X. Tadeo, B. Lopez-Mendez, T. Trigueros, A. Laın, D. Castano and
O. Millet, PLOS Biol., 2009, 7, e1000257.
11 S. Otto, R. L. E. Furlan and J. K. M. Sanders, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000,
122, 12063.
12 In short peptide-like sequences, the proximity of glutamate residues
does not significantly affect the thiol pKa value or the half-cell redox
potential for the formation of disulfides: C. Wu, C. Belenda,
J.-C. Leroux and M. A. Gauthier, Chem.–Eur. J., 2011, 17, 10064.
13 By controlling the amount of DMSO and the pH, we were able to
modulate the rates of thiol oxidation (irreversible) and disulfide
exchange (reversible). Thus, in 25% DMSO at pH 7.5, we observed
that exchange was faster, allowing to work under thermodynamic
control. For a DCL with disulfides using DMSO as co-solvent, see:
A. V. Gromova, J. M. Ciszewski and B. L. Miller, Chem. Commun.,
2012, 48, 2131.
14 For reversibility tests, see ESI†.
15 The effect of a salt (typically 1 M NaNO3) on other DCLs has been
recently studied, although the interactions responsible for the
observed amplifications are different. See: (a) N. Ponnuswamy,
F. B. L. Cougnon, J. M. Clough, G. D. Pantos- and J. K. M. Sanders,
Science, 2012, 338, 783; (b) F. B. L. Cougnon, N. A. Jenkins,
G. D. Pantos- and J. K. M. Sanders, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012,
51, 1443; (c) H. Y. Au-Yeung, G. D. Pantos- and J. K. M. Sanders,
J. Org. Chem., 2011, 76, 1257; (d) F. B. L. Cougnon, H. Y. Au-Yeung,
G. D. Pantos- and J. K. M. Sanders, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 3198;
(e) H. Y. Au-Yeung, G. D. Pantos- and J. K. M. Sanders, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 5331; ( f ) H. Y. Au-Yeung, F. B. L. Cougnon, S. Otto,
G. D. Pantos- and J. K. M. Sanders, Chem. Sci., 2010, 1, 567;
(g) H. Y. Au-Yeung, G. D. Pantos- and J. K. M. Sanders, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2009, 106, 10466.
¨
16 O. Ramstrom, S. Lohmann, T. Bunyapaiboonsri and J.-M. Lehn,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2004, 10, 1711.
17 For selected examples on DCL simulations, see: (a) R. F. Ludlow and
S. Otto, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 5984; (b) A. G. Orrillo and
R. L. E. Furlan, J. Org. Chem., 2010, 75, 211; (c) P. T. Corbett,
J. K. M. Sanders and S. Otto, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 8858;
(d) P. T. Corbett, S. Otto and J. K. M. Sanders, Chem.–Eur. J., 2004,
10, 3139; (e) K. Severin, Chem.–Eur. J., 2004, 10, 2565.
Notes and references
1 For selected reviews in the field, see, (a) F. B. L. Cougnon and
J. K. M. Sanders, Acc. Chem. Res., 2012, DOI: 10.1021/ar200240m; 18 In 75 : 25 water : DMSO at pH 2.5 the oxidation of thiols is faster
(b) N. Giuseppone, Acc. Chem. Res., 2012, DOI: 10.1021/ar2002655; than the disulfide exchange and the system does not fully equilibrate.
(c) E. Moulin, G. Cormos and N. Giuseppone, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 19 (a) V. Haridas, H. Singh, Y. K. Sharma and K. Lal, J. Chem. Sci., 2007,
41, 1031; (d) A. Herrmann, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2009, 7, 3195;
(e) M. M. Rozenman, B. R. McNaughton and D. R. Liu, Curr. Opin.
Chem. Biol., 2007, 11, 259; ( f ) P. T. Corbett, J. Leclaire, L. Vial,
119, 219; (b) D. Ranganathan, V. Haridas, R. Nagaraj and I. L. Karle,
J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 4415; (c) I. L. Karle, D. Ranganathan and
V. Haridas, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 10916.
K. R. West, J.-L. Wietor, J. K. M. Sanders and S. Otto, Chem. Rev., 20 (a) S. A. Kauffman, The origins of Order, Oxford University Press,
¨
2006, 106, 3652; (g) O. Ramstrom and J.-M. Lehn, Nat. Rev.
Oxford, 1993; (b) A. I. Oparin, The Origin of Life, New York: Dover,
Drug Discovery, 2002, 1, 26; (h) S. J. Rowan, S. J. Cantrill,
1952.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 487--489 489