reaction with nearly a 5.6% overall yield from 3-fomylqui-
noline and isatoic anhydride (Scheme 2a).5 In 2002, Ar-
gade and co-workers described a three-step biogenetic type
synthesis of luotonin F with an ensuing overall yield of
38% from the natural product pegamine and 2-aminoben-
zaldehyde (Scheme 2b).6 In 2004, Ma and co-workers
demonstrated a two-step synthesis of luotonin F from
3-quinolinenitrile isatoic anhydride with 37% overall yield
(Scheme 2c).7 However, all of the above methods still
utilized the step-by-step synthetic strategy. Therefore, the
development of a practical and efficient, one-pot protocol
to access luotonin F is both desirable and valuable; it could
also have significance in directing further research for one-
pot synthesis of other natural products.
while 4 could be furnished from the R-haloge ketone 5
through Kornblum oxidation.9 It was also thought that 5
could easily be prepared from 3-acetylquinoline 1k
through a halogenation process.10 The synthetic process
is depicted in Scheme 3b. It is thought to consist of a
R-halogenation, Kornblum oxidation, intermolecular con-
densation, and aromatization reaction sequence. Based on
the draft (Scheme 3aÀb), we wanted to test whether it
would be possible to develop a one-pot protocol for the
synthesis of luotonin F from 3-acetylquinoline 1k and
2-aminobenzamide 2a via a rational logical design, in
which multiple reactions would self-sequentially take place
in one-pot (Scheme 3c).
Scheme 3. Retrosynthetic Analysis and the Protocols for One-
Pot Synthesis of Luotonin F
Scheme 2. Methods for the Synthesis of Luotonin F
Retrosynthetically (Scheme 3a), it was envisioned that
luotonin F could be obtained from 2-oxo-2-(quinolin-3-yl)-
acetaldehyde 4 and 2-aminobenzamide 2a through an
intermolecular condensation and aromatization process,8
(4) (a) Ma, Z. Z.; Hano, Y.; Nomura, T.; Chen, Y. J. Phytochemistry
2000, 53, 1075. (b) Harayama, T.; Morikami, Y.; Shigeta, Y.; Abe, H.;
Takeuchi, Y. Synlett 2003, 847. (c) Twin, H.; Batey, R. A. Org. Lett.
2004, 6, 4913. (d) Ju, Y.; Lu, F., F.; Li, C. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3582.
(e) Liang, Y.; Jiang, X.; Yu, Z. X. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 5302. (f) Huang,
W. P.; Liu, J. L.; Wang, C. L. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 29, 1533.
(g) Twin, H.; Batey, R. A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4913. (h) Zhou, H. B.; Liu,
G. S.; Yao, Z. J. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 6270. (i) Mason, J. J.; Bergman,
J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 2486. (j) Liu, F.; Li, C. J. Org. Chem. 2009,
74, 5699. (k) Liang, J. L.; Cha, H. C.; Jahng, Y. Molecules 2011, 16, 4861
and references therein.
(5) Ma, Z. Z.; Hano, Y.; Nomura, T.; Chen, Y. J. Heterocycles 1999,
51, 1883.
(6) Mhaske, S. B.; Argade, N. P. Synthesis 2002, 323.
(7) Ma, Z. Z.; Hano, Y.; Nomura, T.; Chen, Y. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2004, 14, 1193.
(8) Connolly, D. J.; Cusack, D.; O’Sullivan, T. P.; Guiry, P. J.
Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 10153.
(9) (a) Kornblum, N.; Powers, J. W.; Anderson, G. J.; Jones, W. J.;
Larson, H. O.; Levand, O.; Weaver, W. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79,
6562. (b) Zhu, Y. P.; Liu, M. C.; Jia, F. C.; Yuan, J. J.; Gao, Q. H.; Lian,
M.; Wu, A. X. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 3392. (c) Zhu, Y. P.; Jia, F. C.; Liu,
M. C.; Wu, L. M.; Cai, Q.; Gao, Y.; Wu, A. X. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 5378.
(d) Zhu, Y. P.; Jia, F. C.; Liu, M. C.; Wu, A. X. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 4414.
(e) Zhu, Y. P.; Lian, M.; Jia, F. C.; Liu, M. C.; Yuan, J. J.; Gao, Q. H.;
Wu, A. X. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 9086. (f) Jiang, H. F.; Huang,
H. W.; Cao, H.; Qi, C. R. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5561.
(10) (a) Yin, G. D.; Gao, M.; She, N. F.; Hu, S. L.; Wu, A. X.; Pan,
Y. J. Synthesis 2007, 3113. (b) Wang, Z. H.; Yin, G. D.; Qin, J.; Gao, M.;
Cao, L. P.; Wu, A. X. Synthesis 2008, 3675. (c) Zhu, Y. P.; Gao, Q. H.;
Lian, M.; Yuan, J. J.; Liu, M. C.; Zhao, Q.; Yang, Y.; Wu, A. X. Chem.
Commun. 2011, 47, 12700. (d) Barluenga, J.; Marco-Arias, M.;
With this idea in mind, we optimized the reaction con-
ditions using acetophenone 1a and 2-aminobenzamide 2a
as model substrates (Table 1). Initially, the reaction was
carried outwithI2 (1.1 equiv) in DMSO at 110 °C (entry 1).
This afforded a 73% combined yield of 3aa and 3af (with a
ratio of 1.2:1). To improve the chemoselectivity of the pro-
ducts, various catalysts, additives, and oxidants were inves-
tigated in further detail in DMSO. First, a series of Brønsted
acids, such as HCl, HOAc, MeSO3H, CF3SO3H, and L-
proline, were screened for the reaction. However, the pro-
ducts 3aa and 3af were still only produced with a ratio of 1:1
(entries 2À6). Even when various metal salts and bases, such
as CuO, CuBr, NaOH, PPh3, pyridine, DABCO, DBU, and
K3PO4ÀH2O were added, the reaction efficiency was still
showed no improvement (entries 7À14). Moreover, neither
additives (NIS and TBAI) nor oxidant (TBHP) led to any
further improvement in the reaction efficiency (entries
15À18). However, to our delight, the reaction efficiency
was greatly improved when 2-aminobenzamide 2a in 2 mL
DMSO was added dropwise to a mixture of acetophenone
1a (1.0 mmol) and I2 (1.1 mmol) in 3 mL DMSO at 110 °C
(entry 19). The desired product 3aa was obtained in 75%
yield; while the product 3af was hardly observed at all.
Subsequent increases and decreases in the temperature did
not enhance the reaction yield any further (entries 20À23).
ꢀ
ꢀ
Gonzalez-Bobes, F.; Ballesteros, A.; Gonzalez, J. M. Chem. Commun.
2004, 2614. (e) Pavlinac, J.; Stavber, S.; Zupan, M. J. Org. Chem. 2006,
71, 1027.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX