372
Helvetica Chimica Acta – Vol. 98 (2015)
Fungal Material. The fungal strain, Aspergillus sp. 33241, was isolated from the mangrove Bruguiera
sexangula var. rhynchopetala collected in the South China Sea in August, 2012. The strain was deposited
with the Key Laboratory of Tropical Medicinal Plant Chemistry of Ministry of Education, College of
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hainan Normal University of P. R. China, Hainan, with the access
code 33241.
Identification of Fungus. This fungus was identified according to its morphological characteristics and
molecular-biological protocol. Its 577 base-pair ITS sequence had 99% sequence identity to that of
Aspergillus sp. F 62 (FJ755829). The sequence data have been submitted to GenBank, with an accession
No. KF 924560, and the fungal strain was identified as Aspergillus sp.
Extraction and Isolation. The fungus Aspergillus sp. (33241) was cultivated in 20 l potato glucose
liquid medium (15 g of glucose and 33 g of sea salt in 1 l of potato infusion, in 1-l Erlenmeyer flasks, each
containing 300 ml of culture broth) at r.t. without shaking for 4 weeks. The AcOEt extract of the mycelia
was purified repeatedly by CC (SiO2 and Sephadex LH-20K) and reversed-phase (RP) HPLC to obtain
aspergilumamide A (1) and the known analog penilumamide (2).The fungus cultures were filtered
through cheesecloth, and the mycelia was extracted with MeOH to obtain MeOH extracts, and then
MeOH extracts were extracted with AcOEt three times to obtain AcOEt extracts (20.5 g). The AcOEt
extracts were subjected to CC (SiO2; petroleum ether (PE)/AcOEt 100 :0 – 0 :100) to give six fractions,
Fr. 1 – Fr. 6. Fr. 4 was purified by CC (SiO2; PE/AcOEt 3 :1, then subjected to CC (Sephadex LH-20;
CHCl3/MeOH 1:1), and further purified by semi-prep. HPLC (62% MeOH/H2O) to afford compounds 1
(3.8 mg) and 2 (20.0 mg)
Aspergilumamide A (¼ Methyl 2-({N2-[(1,3-Dimethyl-2,4-dioxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropteridin-6-yl)car-
bonyl]-l-glutaminyl}amino)benzoate; 1). White powder. [a]2D5 ¼ þ28 (c ¼ 0.18, MeOH). UV (MeOH):
222 (2.16), 249 (1.70), 318 (0.51), 334 (0.47). IR (KBr): 3436, 2924, 1647, 1246, 1089. 1H- and 13C-NMR:
Table. ESI-MS: 520.0 ([M þ Na]þ). HR-ESI-MS: 520.1554 ([M þ Na]þ, C22H23N7NaOþ7 ; calc. 520.1551).
Determination of Absolute Configuration of 1 by Marfeyꢀs Method. A soln. of 1 (1.5 mg) in 6m HCl
(1 ml) was heated to 1058 for 12 h. The soln. was then evaporated to dryness, and the residue was
redissolved in H2O (250 ml). A 50-ml portion of the hydrolysate was then placed in a 1-ml reaction vial and
treated with a 1% soln. of FDAA (200 ml) in acetone, followed by 1.0m NaHCO3 (40 ml). The mixture was
heated at 458 for 1 h, cooled to r.t., and then acidified with 2.0m HCl (20 ml). In a similar fashion, l-Glu
and d-Glu were derivatized with FDAA separately. The FDAA derivatives of the hydrolysates, and l-
Glu and d-Glu were subjected to HPLC analysis (Waters C18 column; 5 mm, 4.6 ꢀ 250 mm; 1.0 ml/min)
at 308, using the following gradient program: solvent A (H2O þ 0.1% TFA), solvent B (MeCN), linear
gradient: 20 – 60% aq. MeCN with 0.1% TFA (linear gradient for 60 min), 308; UV detection at 340 nm.
The retention times (tR) for the FDAA-l-Glu and FDAA-d-Glu are 15.37 and 16.74 min, resp.; tR of the
FDAA derivative of hydrolysates of 1 was 15.37 min.
Antibacterial Activity Assay. Antibacterial activity was evaluated by the conventional broth dilution
assay [10]. Six terrestrial pathogenic bacteria, including Staphylococcus epidermidis, S. aureus,
Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, B. cereus, and Micrococcus luteus, and two marine pathogenic bacteria,
Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Listonella anguillarum, were used, and ciprofloxacin was used as a positive
control.
Cytotoxicity Assay. The cytotoxicity against human lung cancer (SPC-A-1), human liver cancer
(BEL-7402), human gastric cancer (SGC-7901), and leukemia (K562) cell lines were evaluated by using
MTT assay [11].
REFERENCES
[1] J. W. Blunt, B. R. Copp, R. A. Keyzers, M. H. G. Munro, M. R. Prinsep, Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 160.
[2] F. He, J. Bao, X. Y. Zhang, Z. C. Tu, Y. M. Shi, S. H. Qi, J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 1182.
[3] H. Q. Gao, W. Q. Guo, Q. Wang, L. Q. Zhang, M. L. Zhu, T. J. Zhu, Q. Q. Gu, W. Wang, D. H. Li,
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 21, 1776.
[4] C. L. Shao, C. Y. Wang, M. Y. Wei, Y. C. Gu, Z. G. She, P. Y. Qian, Y. C. Lin, Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2011, 21, 690.