K. E. Lazarski et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 635–637
637
route (Fig. 6A). Cyclic acetal 28 was prepared in analogy to the
preparation of 16 (see Fig. 5B), and then converted into TBS ether
29. Acetal protecting group removal followed by a Saegusa oxida-
tion of ketone 30 resulted in an inseparable 1:1 mixture of diaste-
reomeric enones (i.e., 31) Further oxidation produced the
conjugate addition precursor, dienone 32. Conditions were then
screened to remove the TBS group in the hope that the liberated
hydroxyl group would spontaneously cyclize due to its proximity
to the enone. Unfortunately, exposure of 32 to trifluoroacetic acid
(TFA), tetrabutyl ammonium fluoride (TBAF), or hydrogen fluoride
(HF) instead led to the formation of phenol 33, presumably by way
of a dienone–phenol rearrangement.14 The free tertiary alcohol
could be isolated under appropriate conditions (see Supporting
Information), but all attempts to induce cyclization in a second
step resulted in either decomposition or the unwanted formation
of phenol 33. Because of the facility that dienone 32 aromatized,
the 1:1 mixture of mono-enones 31 was examined in regard to
the conjugate addition. To our delight, treatment of siloxy enone
with TBAF provided a 64% yield of ether 35 (based on 50% conver-
sion of the 1:1 mixture of isomeric starting materials). This was the
first instance of efficient ether bond formation we observed and so
we were therefore disappointed that X-ray crystallographic analy-
sis of the product revealed that the addition had proceeded to af-
ford the incorrect stereochemistry. At this juncture it is unclear
whether or not the same issue would arise in more advanced inter-
mediates en route to the actual natural product, but our results
indicate that some caution is likely warranted if such a strategy
were to be undertaken. In fact, the recently reported total synthesis
of maoecrystal V completed by Peng and Danishefsky utilized a re-
lated east-to-west etherification that also provided the incorrect
stereochemistry, thereby necessitating significant steps to correct
the issue.15
Center at NU. B.A. is a Lambert Fellow within the Chemistry of Life
Processes Institute at NU.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. Sun, H. D.; Huang, S. X.; Han, Q. B. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2006, 23, 673–698.
2. (a) Gong, J.; Lin, G.; Li, C. C.; Yang, Z. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4770–4773; (b)
Krawczuk, P. J.; Schöne, N.; Baran, P. S. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4774–4776; (c) Peng,
F.; Yu, M.; Danishefsky, S. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 6586–6587; (d)
Nicolaou, K. C.; Dong, L.; Deng, L.; Talbont, A. C.; Chen, D. Y.-K. Chem. Commun.
2010, 46, 70–72; (e) Singh, V.; Bhalerao, P.; Movin, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010,
51, 3337–3339; (f) Lazarski, K. E.; Hu, D. X.; Stern, C. L.; Thomson, R. J. Org. Lett.
2010, 12, 3010–3013; (g) Baitinger, I.; Mayer, P.; Trauner, D. Org. Lett. 2010, 12,
5656–5659; (h) Peng, F.; Danishefsky, S. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 2104–
2106; (i) Gu, Z.; Zakarian, A. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1080–1082; (j) Dong, L.; Deng,
L.; Lim, Y. H.; Leung, G. Y. C.; Chen, D. Y.-K. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 5781–5887.
3. (a) Gong, J.; Lin, G.; Sun, W.; Li, C. C.; Yang, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
16745–16746; (b) Peng, F.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134,
18860–18867.
4. For relevant reviews of remote functionalization reactions, see: (a) Heusler, K.;
Kalvoda, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1964, 3, 525–596; (b) Godula, K.; Sames, D.
Science 2006, 312, 67–72; (c) Brückl, T.; Baxter, R. D.; Ishihara, Y.; Baran, P. S.
Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 826–839.
5. Miller, R. D.; McKean, D. R. Synthesis 1979, 730–732.
6. (a) Rubottom, G. M.; Vazquez, M. A.; Pelegrina, D. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1974, 15,
4319–4322; (b) Hassner, A.; Reuss, R. H.; Pinnick, H. W. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40,
3427–3429.
7. McDonald, C. E.; Holcomb, H.; Leathers, T.; Ampadu-Nyarko, F.; Frommer, J., Jr.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 6283–6286.
8. Dorta, R. L.; Francisco, C. G.; Freire, R.; Suárez, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29,
5429–5432.
9. An alternative mechanism invoking a Norrish I-type cleavage of intermediate
13 is also plausible. In this scenario, cyclopentanone scission would generate a
ketone and an acyl radical, which could potentially recombine to produce
intermediate 15.
10. Reimann, H.; Capomaggi, A. S.; Strauss, T.; Oliveto, E. P.; Barton, D. H. R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 4481–4482.
11. (a) RajanBabu, T. V.; Nugent, W. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 986–997;
Reisman and coworkers utilized this lactone forming reaction as part of an
elegant total synthesis of maoecrystal Z, see: (b) Cha, J. Y.; Yeoman, J. T. S.;
Reisman, S. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 14964–14967.
In summary, our investigations have revealed numerous com-
plications with the ‘east-to-west’ ether bond construction strategy.
Because of this, we have begun examining alternative strategies
that install the desired ether with the correct stereochemistry at
an early stage of the synthesis. The results of these ongoing inves-
tigations will be reported in due course.
12. (a) Vedejs, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 5944–5946; (b) Vedejs, E.; Engler, D. A.;
Telschow J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 188–196.
13. Concepción, J. I.; Francisco, C. G.; Hernández, R.; Salazar, J. A.; Suárez, E.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 1953–1956.
14. (a) Andereocci, A. Gazz, Chim. Ital. 1893, 23, 468–476; (b) Clemo, G. R.;
Haworth, R. D.; Walton, E. J. Chem. Soc. 1930, 1110–1115; (c) Wilds, A. L.;
Djerassi, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1946, 68, 1715–1719.
15. Installation of the correct ether stereochemistry has proven to be problematic
in a number of approaches pursued by other groups. For illustrative examples
and educational discussions, see: Refs. 2d,h,j,3b.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge support from Northwestern Univer-
sity, the NIH (training grant T32AG000260), and the American
Cancer Society by way of an Illinois Division Research Scholar
Award (RSG-12-253-01-CDD) to R.J.T. and an institutional grant
(ACS-IRG 93-037-15) to the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer