Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
presumably due to a more efficient minimization of the 6-endo-
dig cyclization side pathway. Using a ferrocenyl group led to
the synthesis of crystalline derivative 3p, which allowed
confirming the cis configuration for the major product by X-
ray diffraction. A range of styrenes with a variety of
substituents were also tested (3r−aa), providing equally
good results in terms of both efficiency and stereoselectivity.
The power of this methodology is illustrated by the two-step
preparation of cyclopropanes such as 3b, whose synthesis
required previously six steps starting from styrene and ethyl
diazoacetate.24 Similarly, indene was cyclopropanated with
excellent diastereoselectivity (3q). Less activated alkenes such
as simple cyclohexene also react to give 3k−l. Also, more
electron-rich alkenes such as N-vinylphthalimide proved to be
compatible with the reaction conditions, providing cyclo-
propylamine derivatives 3n−o in good yield and diastereose-
lectivity. Then, we examined other types of carbon substituents
in the alkyne terminus of 1. 1,3-Enynyl cycloheptatrienes were
prepared from terminal 1,3-enynes and were successfully
employed in the carbene-transfer process. This allowed the
synthesis of several 1,3-enynyl cyclopropanes, 3ab−af, with
high diastereoselectivity. The moderate yields obtained can be
attributed to oligomerization pathways. Analogously, extended
C(sp) systems were also tolerated, granting access to 1,3-diynyl
cyclopropanes 3aw and 3ax (Scheme 3, bottom right). To
cover the entire range of carbon substituents, we tested various
cycloheptatrienes 1 with alkyl groups in the alkyne terminus
(Scheme 4, top right). Tertiary C(sp3) groups performed very
well in the reaction, bearing either C- or O-substituents, giving
good to excellent yields and moderate to good diastereose-
lectivities. Styrenes with different substitution patterns (3ag−
ak), indene (3al), enamines (3ai), or cyclohexene (3ao) could
be employed, and an inverse relationship between steric bulk
of the R group in 1 and the diastereoselectivity could be
observed (3am vs 3an). Benzyloxy derivatives 3aq−av were
also prepared successfully. On the other hand, substrates with
primary and secondary alkyl groups were much more prone to
undergo cycloisomerization to indenes analogous to 4a−c,
giving cyclopropanes such as 3ap in lower yield.
In order to illustrate the potential of the reaction in late-
stage functionalization, we synthesized several alkynylcyclo-
propane derivatives of natural or drug-like molecules (Scheme
4, bottom left). Thus, new derivatives of indomethacin (anti-
inflammatory, 4ba), α-tocopherol (vitamin E, 3bb), and
estrone (steroid, 3bc) were accessed in a diastereoselective
manner. We proved the modularity of this approach by
introducing the complex molecular fragment as either the
alkene or the alkyne component of the reaction. For this
purpose, we prepared regioisomeric derivatives 3ay and 3az
from fenofibrate, a drug used to treat hypercholesterolemia,
which has recently been suggested for the treatment of life-
threatening symptoms of COVID-19.25 These examples
demonstrate the compatibility of the new method with
complex molecules containing diverse functional groups such
as esters, ketones, or indoles.
Table 1. Optimization and Control Experiments
1
Yields and cis/trans ratios determined by H NMR using Ph2CH2 as
a
internal standard. Standard conditions: 1 equiv of 1a with 4 equiv of
2a using [Rh2(TFA)4] (5 mol %) as catalyst in PhMe/hexane (1:1,
b
c
0.15 M) at 80 °C for 20 h. CHCl3 used as solvent. [(JohnPhos)-
d
Au(MeCN)]SbF6 used as catalyst. Hexane used as solvent.
23
much lower yields of 3a, and other Lewis acids such as ZnCl2
led only to trace amounts of indenes (Table 1, entry 7).
Reduced catalyst loading could be employed, leading to a small
drop in yield when using 1.7 mol % of [Rh2(TFA)4] (Table 1,
entry 6). Solvent choice proved to be critical for the success of
the reaction. Thus, no reaction was observed in polar or protic
solvents (Table 1, entry 11). Hexane was found to behave best
in terms of yield and diastereoselectivity (Table 1, entries 8−
10), only outperformed by a 1:1 mixture of hexane and
toluene, which was selected as a standard solvent system
considering both the efficiency and solubility of more polar
substrates. We found concentration to have little effect on the
reaction outcome (Table 1, entry 12). Performing the reaction
at 40 °C in either hexane or toluene led to lower yields and
conversions (Table 1, entries 13, 14), while a significant
erosion in both yield and diastereoselectivity was observed at
100 °C (Table 1, entry 15).
The scope of the alkynylcyclopropanation reaction was
examined with a wide variety of 7-alkynyl cycloheptatrienes 1,
prepared in a straightforward manner by treating terminal
alkynes with nBuLi and subsequently with tropylium
tetrafluoroborate (Scheme 1C), giving exclusively the desired
products 1 in high yields.
First, we examined the transfer of carbon-substituted alkynyl
carbene fragments (Scheme 3). We selected styrene as model
alkene to evaluate the reactivity of a wide range of (aryl)alkynyl
cycloheptatrienes, obtaining disubstituted cyclopropanes 3a−j
in good to excellent yields and high selectivity for the cis
diastereoisomer. Electronically and sterically different sub-
stituents in any position of the ring are well tolerated, including
different halide groups. Interestingly, bulky aromatics such as
2-methylphenyl (3h) or 1-naphthyl (3m) give higher yields,
After observing that simple 7-ethynyl-1,3,5-cycloheptatriene
did not lead to any productive reactivity, we envisioned the
possibility of transferring silyl-protected alkynyl carbenes in
order to access terminal alkynyl cyclopropanes. First, we
explored the reactivity of different silyl-protected 7-alkynyl
cycloheptatrienes (Scheme 4). To our delight, we found that in
all cases these substrates afforded the product of decarbena-
tion−cyclopropanation of styrene in excellent yields. These
10762
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 10760−10769