reactions demonstrated that the same transformation
could be carried out using a sodium thiolate in a thiol/
THF solvent mixture and a CO pressure of 10 atm.7,8
Recently, we reported a simple setup for running Pd-
catalyzed alkoxy- and aminocarbonylations employing
stoichiometric carbon monoxide generated from an acid
chloride precursor.9 This procedure provided a convenient
access to amides without concerns about handling this
toxic gas. The optimization of the catalytic system withlow
CO loadings was the key to success for such transforma-
tions. Furthermore, the method proved to be easily adapt-
able for 13C- and 14C-isotope labeling of pharmaceutically
relevant small molecules.10 In this paper, we demonstrate
that through optimization of the catalytic system and the
reaction conditions a diverse array of aromatic thioesters
can be obtained from the reaction of thiols with both
electron-rich and electron-deficient aryl iodides using a
simple procedure with only stoichiometric amounts of
carbon monoxide. The method also lends itself as an ideal
technique for isotope labeling of the carbonyl group.
In order to identify effective conditions for promoting
the Pd-thiocarbonylation, we initially relied on the catalyt-
ic system developed by Hartwig and co-workers in their
efficient synthesis of aryl thioethers using the combination
of Pd(OAc)2/Josiphos (PhPF-t-Bu) as the catalytic sys-
tem and sodium tert-butoxide as the base in DME.11 All
reactions were carried out applying a two-chamber system
with the ex situ production of CO as earlier reported.9
However, coupling of thiophenol with p-iodoanisole under
these conditions gave the direct coupling product 2 in a
91% yield with only traces of the desired thioester 1
(Scheme 1). A ligand and base screening revealed that
DPEphos in combination with sodium acetate as the base
Scheme 1. Results from Optimization Studies
a Ex situ generated CO from 9-methylfluorene-9-carbonyl chloride
(COgen).
afforded a complete reversal in chemoselectivity leading to
compound 1 in a gratifying yield of 93% (see the Support-
ing Information for the optimization table). A few other
bidentate ligands also proved effective for this conver-
sion including DPPF and Xantphos. However, the yields
of thioester 1 were generally approximately 10À20% lower
than for DPEphos. The catalytic loading could also be
reduced from 5 to only 1 mol % without a significant dete-
rioration in the thioester yield (89% isolated yield of 1).
Significantly, only 1.5 equivalents of carbon monoxide
were necessary for this reaction to run effectively.
The generality of the reaction conditions was next tested
on a variety of aryl iodides and thiols as illustrated in
Scheme 2. Coupling of thiophenol to a number of differ-
ently functionalized aryl iodides provided the thioesters in
good yields (1À16). Even heteroaromatic iodides proved
effective for these carbonylative couplings as depicted with
the indole and thiophene ring system leading to products
14/15 and 16, respectively, in over 80% yield. With the
former, partial deprotection of the indole nitrogen took
place under the reaction conditions, but the combined
thioester yield still attained 90%. A few other aromatic
thiols were also successfully tested as represented by com-
pounds 17À19. Finally, three alkyl thiols were run, provid-
ing the functionalized esters (20À22) in approximately
70% yield. In particular, compounds 21 and 22 are gener-
ated from two cysteine derivatives. No epimerization was
noted on the 1H NMR spectra of compound 22 attesting to
the mildness of the reactionconditionsemployingthe weak
base, sodium acetate. Applying the reaction conditions to
electron-deficient aryl iodides proved to be somewhat
problematic. In general, the thioethers were obtained as
the major product. Increasing the number of equivalents of
CO and, hence, the overall pressure of the reaction system,
provided a partial solution, but not one which was satis-
factory. This observation on the reactivity of such sub-
strates corresponds well with a mechanism whereby the
CO-insertion step into the PdÀaryl bond is slow compared to
the other steps of the catalytic cycle.12 A solvent screening was
undertaken to investigate its effect on the chemoselectivity in
(7) Hu, Y. H.; Liu, J.; Lu, Z. X.; Luo, X. C.; Zhang, H.; Lan, Y.; Lei,
A. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 3153.
(8) Recently, Oshima and co-workers showed the possibility of using
the iron carbonyl complex [CpFe(CO)2]2 as a CO precursor for Pd-
catalyzed thioarylation of a few simple aryl iodides in varying yields.
Although the method also makes use of stoichiometric carbonylation, it
nevertheless requires the presence of a toxic transition-metal carbonyl
complex. Nakaya, R.; Yorimitsu, H.; Oshima, K. Chem. Lett. 2011,
40, 904.
(9) Hermange, P.; Lindhardt, A. T.; Taaning, R. H.; Bjerglund, K.;
Lupp, D.; Skrydstrup, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6061.
(10) (a) Hermange, P.; Gøgsig, T. M.; Lindhardt, A. T.; Taaning,
R. H.; Skrydstrup, T. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 2444. (b) Nielsen, D. U.;
Taaning, R. H.; Lindhardt, A. T.; Gøgsig, T. M.; Skrydstrup, T. Org.
Lett. 2011, 13, 4454. (c) Friis, S. D.; Taaning, R. H.; Lindhardt, A. T.;
Skrydstrup, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 18114. (d) Xin, Z.; Gøgsig,
T. M.; Lindhardt, A. T.; Skrydstrup, T. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 284. (e)
Bjerglund, K.; Lindhardt, A. T.; Skrydstrup, T. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77,
3793. (f) Gøgsig, T. M.; Nielsen, D. U.; Lindhardt, A. T.; Skrydstrup, T.
Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2536. (g) Burhardt, M. N.; Taaning, R.; Nielsen,
N. C.; Skrydstrup, T. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 5357. (h) Gøgsig, T. M.;
Taaning, R. H.; Lindhardt, A. T.; Skrydstrup, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2012, 51, 798. (i) Nielsen, D. U.; Neumann, K.; Taaning, R. H.;
Lindhardt, A. T.; Modvig, A.; Skrydstrup, T. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77,
6155. (j) Lindhardt, A. T.; Simonssen, R.; Taaning, R. H.; Gøgsig,
T. M.; Nilsson, G. N.; Stenhagen, G.; Elmore, C. S.; Skrydstrup, T.
J. Labelled Compd. Radiopharm. 2012, 55, 411.
(11) (a) Baranano, D.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
2937. (b) Mann, G.; Baranano, D.; Hartwig, J. F.; Rheingold, A. L.;
ꢀ
Guzei, I. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9205. (c) Fernandez-Rodrıguez,
(12) In this case, the product yields obtained with the electron-
deficient aryl halides are generally lower than those for the electron-rich
substrates. For examples, see: Wu, X.-F.; Neumann, H.; Spannenberg,
A.; Schulz, T.; Jiao, H.; Beller, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 14596
and ref 10a,10f.
M. A.; Shen, Q.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2180. (d)
ꢀ
Hartwig, J. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1534. (e) Fernandez-Rodrıguez,
M. A.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 1663. (f) Alvaro, E.;
Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 7858.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 4, 2013
949