Acknowledgments
20
27
12
24
42
23
78.7
42.4
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (grants 81473110), Shanghai Science &
Technology Support Program (13431900401), the Chinese
National Science & Technology Major Project “Key New Drug
Creation and Manufacturing Program” (grant 2013ZX09508104).
References and notes
1. Hardy, J.; Selkoe, D. J. Science 2002, 297, 353.
28
48
48
24
24
56.0
60.5
2. (a) Wu, T.; Jiang, C.; Wang, L.; Morris-Natschke, S. L., Miao, H.;
Gu, L.; Xu, J.; Lee, K.-H.; Gu, Q. J. Nat. Prod. 2015, 78, 1593; (b)
Wang, H.; Wang, R.; Lakshmana, M. K.; Nefzi, A. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2014, 24, 4384; (c) Rueeger, H.; Lueoend, R.;
Machauer, R.; Veenstra, S. J.; Jacobson, L. H.; Staufenbiel, M.;
Desrayaud, S.; Rondeau, J.-M.; Möbitz, H.; Neumann, U. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 23, 5300; (d) Citron, M. Nat. Rev. Drug
Disc. 2010, 9, 387.
3. Salloway, S.; Sperling, R.; Keren, R.; Porsteinsson, A. P.; van
Dyck, C. H.; Tariot, P. N.; Gilman, S.; Arnold, D.; Abushakra, S.;
Hernandez, C.; Crans, G.; Liang, E.; Quinn, G.; Bairu, M.;
Pastrak, A.; Cedarbaum, J. M.; Investigators, E. A. Neurology
2011, 77, 1253.
29
30
48
24
22
20
62.8
53.7
4. Hamaguchi, T.; Ono, K.; Yamada, M. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2010,
16, 285.
5. Aisen, P. S.; Gauthier, S.; Ferris, S. H.; Saumier, D.; Haine, D.;
Garceau, D.; Duong, A.; Suhy, J.; Oh, J.; Lau, W. C. Arch. Med.
Sci. 2011, 7, 102.
31
6. (a) Gu, Y.; Qi, C.; Sun, X.; Ma, X.; Zhang, H.; Hu, L.; Yuan, J.;
Yu, Q. Biochem. pharmacol. 2012, 84, 468; (b) Lei, M.; Gan, X.;
Zhao, K.; Yu, Q.; Hu, L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 435.
7. (a) Lee, J. Y.; Kim, C. J. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2010, 33, 947; (b)
Cho, M. K.; Jang, Y. P.; Kim, Y. C.; Kim, S. G. Int.
Immunopharmacol. 2004, 4, 1419; (c) Fan, T.; Jiang, W. L.; Zhu,
J.; Feng Zhang, Y. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2012, 35, 2004.
8. Wu, R.-M.; Sun, Y.-Y.; Zhou, T.-T.; Zhu, Z.-Y.; Zhuang, J.-J.;
Tang, X.; Chen, J.; Hu, L.-H.; Shen, X. Acta Pharmacol. Sin.
2014, 35, 1274.
9. (a) Jang, Y. P.; Kim, S. R.; Choi, Y. H.; Kim, J.; Kim, S. G.;
Markelonis, G. J.; Oh, T. H.; Kim, Y. C. J. Neurosci. Res. 2002,
68, 233; (b) Li, D.; Liu, Q.; Jia, D.; Dou, D.; Wang, X.; Kang, T.
Planta. Med. 2014, 80, 48; (c) Jang, Y. P.; Kim, S. R.; Kim, Y. C.
Planta. Med. 2001, 67, 470.
10. Zhang, N.; Wen, Q.; Ren, L.; Liang, W.; Xia, Y.; Zhang, X.;
Zhao, D.; Sun, D.; Hu, Y.; Hao, H.; Yan, Y.; Zhang, G.; Yang, J.;
Kang, T. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 18657.
11. (a) Zhu, Z.; Yan, J.; Jiang, W.; Yao, X. G.; Chen, J.; Chen, L.; Li,
C.; Hu, L.; Jiang, H.; Shen, X. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 13138; (b)
Shen, S.; Zhuang, J.; Chen, Y.; Lei, M.; Chen, J.; Shen, X.; Hu, L.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 3882.
a Isolated yields.
Because compound 19 and 20 exhibited good activities of
lowering Aβ content as well as they were easy to synthesize,
therefore 19 and 20 were chosen to evaluate the activities of
lowering Aβ content at different concentrations of 0.1, 1, 10 and
20 μM (Figure 2). As shown in Figure 2, the results exhibited
that 1, 19 and 20 were not significantly different at the
concentrations of 0.1 μM from the control. 19 and 20 displayed
the activities of lowering Aβ at 1 μM, however 1 still was
inactive under this concentration. The results in Figure 2 clearly
indicated that the bioactivities of 19 and 20 were superior to 1
under different concentrations.
120
100
80
60
Supplementary Material
40
Supplementary data (synthesis of 2–31 and biological assay
methods) associated with this article can be found, in the online
version, at
20
0
0 20 10 1 0.1 20 10 1 0.1 20 10 1 0.1
1 (µM)
19 (µM)
20 (µM)
Figure 2. The structure of arctigenin (ATG).
In summary, 30 arctigenin-4-yl carbamate derivatives were
synthesized and evaluated for potencies of lowering Aβ content.
In all of the synthesized compounds, arctigenin-4-yl alkyl
carbamate derivatives showed lower activities, while arctigenin-
4-yl aryl or aralkyl carbamate derivatives showed higher
activities
than
arctigenin.
Arctigenin-4-yl
(3-
chlorophenyl)carbamate (20) exhibited the strongest potency of
lowering Aβ content. Furthermore, both arctigenin-4-yl (4-
chlorophenyl)carbamate
(19)
and
arctigenin-4-yl
(3-
chlorophenyl)carbamate (20) were superior to arctigenin under
the concentrations of 1, 10 and 20 μM.