WANG ET AL.
7.2 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) d 163.6, 141.7, 125.9, 114.5,
70.7, 69.8, 43.7. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C9H12N2O4 [M + H]+: 213.0797,
found 213.0872. ½aꢃD19 = +3.0 (c 1.0, Methanol).
Determination of diastereomeric excess of 1 in the salt. The
diastereomeric excess (% de) of the salt (=enantiomeric excess (% ee)
of 1) was determined by HPLC with Lux Cellulose-2 column
(4.6 ꢀ 250 mm I.D., 3 mm, Phenomenex). The salt was treated with
HCl aq. The liberated acid was extracted by ethyl acetate and dried with
anhydrous Na2SO4. After removal of solvent under reduced pressure,
the enantiopurity of the liberated 1 was determined by HPLC analysis
on chiral column Lux Cellulose-2. The mobile phase was hexane/ethanol
(93/7) with 0.15% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), and flow rate was 1.0 ml/min
under detection wavelength of 210nm. Retention time: (S)-1 15.47min,
(R)-1 18.16 min.
Fig. 1. The structure of Clopidogrel.
Preparation of (S)-3, (S)-4, (S)-5, (S)-6, and (S)-7 was the same as that of
(S)-2, just replacing the 2-chlorophenol with 2-methoxylphenol, 2-nitrophenol,
4-choloro phenol, 3-nitrophenol, and 4-nitrophenol, respectively.
(S)-2. Yield: 82%; mp: 102–106 ꢁC; IR (KBr): 3381, 3140, 3069, 2935,
2869, 1589, 1577, 1487, 1455, 1298, 1283, 1252, 1102, 1073,1062, 1002,
958, 749, 692 cmꢂ1 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.38 (dd, J = 7.9,
;
Resolution of rac-1. Traditional resolution procedure is as follows.
To a 5 ml flask were added 186 mg of rac-1 (1 mmol), 1 mmol of
resolving agent, and 1 ml of resolving solvent followed by heating under
stirring to obtain a clear solution at 70 ꢁC. The solution was gradually
cooled to 25 ꢁC and kept for about 7 days,1 and the precipitated diastereo-
meric salt was filtered off and washed with cooled resolving solvent to
yield salt crystals, followed by drying at 45 ꢁC under vacuum.
Dutch resolution procedure was the same as traditional resolution
procedure, just replacing 0.1 mmol of resolving agent with additive. In
other words, 0.9 mmol resolving agent and 0.1 mmol additive were added
to the resolution system.
1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (td, J= 8.3, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (ddd, J= 15.1, 7.8, 1.3 Hz, 2H),
4.13–3.97 (m, 3H), 3.02 (dd, J= 12.9, 4.1 Hz, 1H), 2.98–2.89 (m, 1H). 13C
NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) d 154.1, 130.2, 127.8, 122.9, 121.8, 113.6, 71.5,
70.0, 44.0. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) (electrospray
ionization, ESI) calcd. for C9H12ClNO2 [M + H]+: 202.0557, found 202.0634.
The optical purity of (S)-2 was determined by HPLC with Lux Cellulose-1
column (4.6 ꢀ 250 mm I.D., 3 mm, Phenomenex). The mobile phase was
hexane/isopropanol (50/50) with 0.2% diethylamine and flow rate
was 0.8 ml/min under detection wavelength of 224 nm. Retention
time: (S)-2 5.82 min, (R)-2 6.95 min. ½aꢃ1D9 = +9.5 (c 1.0, Methanol).
Analytical data of the less soluble salt (R)-1ꢄ(S)-5 by the Dutch resolu-
(S)-3. Yield: 87%; mp: 97–101 ꢁC; IR (KBr): 3417, 3007, 2935, 2841,
tion are shown as follows. (R)-1ꢄ(S)-5: ½aꢃ2D1 = ꢂ78 (c 1.0, Ethanol); mp:
126–130 ꢁC; IR (KBr) cmꢂ1 : 3394, 3101, 2921, 1583, 1492, 1473, 1438,
1367, 1285, 1245, 1088, 821, 749; 1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O) d 7.33–7.27
(m, 1H), 7.27–7.21 (m, 1H), 7.18 (dd, J = 9.1, 3.3 Hz, 4H), 6.81 (d,
J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 5.17 (s, 1H), 4.09 (dt, J = 8.4, 4.1 Hz, 1H), 3.92 (qd,
J = 10.3, 4.6 Hz, 2H), 3.11 (dd, J = 13.2, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 3.00 (dd, J = 13.2,
9.1 Hz, 1H).; 13C NMR (101 MHz, D2O): 178.6, 156.5, 137.6, 133.2,
129.7, 129.6, 129.4, 129.3, 127.3, 125.7, 125.7, 116.0, 72.0, 69.6, 65.9, 41.6.
1594, 1509, 1465, 1450, 1258, 1230, 1125, 1025, 913, 860, 747 cmꢂ1 1H
;
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.03–6.85(m, 4H), 4.12–4.03 (m, 1H), 3.99
(dq, J = 12.6, 6.3 Hz, 2H), 3.90–3.83 (m, 3H), 2.96 (d, J = 12.7 Hz, 1H),
2.88 (t, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 2.48–1.76 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) d
149.8, 148.1, 122.0, 121.0, 114.8, 111.8, 72.4, 70.3, 55.8, 44.0. HRMS
(ESI) calcd. for C10H15NO3 [M + H]+: 198.1127, found 198.1127. The
optical purity of (S)-3 was determined as the same as (S)-2. Retention
time: (S)-3 7.75 min, (R)-3 22.98 min. ½aꢃ2D0 = +5.5 (c 1.0, Methanol).
(S)-4. Yield: 83%; mp: 91–95 ꢁC; IR (KBr): 3378, 3301, 3190, 2921,
2881, 1610, 1583, 1524, 1347, 1278, 1169, 1151, 1089, 1201, 860,
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Traditional Resolution of Rac-1 with Resolving Agents
743 cmꢂ1 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.87 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.55
;
(t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.24–6.91 (m, 2H), 4.63–4.08 (m, 2H), 4.01 (dt,
J = 10.1, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 2.96 (ddd, J = 19.3, 12.8, 5.4 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR
(101 MHz, CDCl3) d 151.7, 138.6, 135.5, 125.9, 121.1, 115.0, 71.2, 67.9,
42.3. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C9H12N2O4 [M + H]+: 213.0797, found
Optical active (R)-phenylethylamine (PEA) is well known to
be a good resolving agent for mandelic acid derivatives.26–28
The m-chloromandelic acid and p-chloro mandelic acid can
be resolved by enantiopure PEA, but rac-1 could not.29
Maybe, the o-chlorine disturbs the aromatic interactions of
PEA and o-chloromandelic acid. In order to find the suitable
resolving agent for rac-1, enantiopure aryloxypropylamines
with heteroatom Cl or hetero groups OCH3 and NO2 on ben-
zene ring were chosen as resolving agents.30,31 Halogen
bonding interactions may occur between chlorine of rac-1
and heteroatoms (Fig. 3). A series of aryloxypropylamines
were synthesized according to the reported method.25
213.0878. ½aꢃ2D0 = +7.0 (c 1.0, Methanol).
(S)-5. Yield: 91%; mp: 115–119 ꢁC; IR (KBr): 3345, 3276, 3066, 2962,
2923, 2870, 2750, 1596, 1581, 1492, 1466, 1317, 1289, 1248, 1219, 1170,
1118, 1102, 1028, 999, 823, 673 cmꢂ1 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d
;
7.28–7.21 (m, 2H), 6.91–6.81 (m, 2H), 4.01–3.91 (m, 3H), 3.03–2.94 (m,
1H), 2.86 (ddd, J = 12.7, 7.3, 3.6 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) d
157.2, 129.3, 125.9, 115.7, 70.4, 70.2, 43.9. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for
C9H12ClNO2 [M + H]+: 202.0557, found 202.0633. The optical purity of
(S)-5 was determined as the same as (S)-2. Retention time: (S)-5
5.53 min, (R)-5 6.35 min. ½aꢃ1D9 = +4.5 (c 1.0, Methanol).
(S)-6. Yield: 83%; mp: 105–109 ꢁC; IR (KBr): 3336, 3290, 3100, 2950,
2927, 2862, 2789, 1615, 1581, 1514,1481, 1461,1355, 1321,1253, 1139,
1In the resolution of rac-1 with (S)-5 and (S)-4, in order to obtain the less
soluble salt in a short time, three types of experiments were performed:
(a) stay the solution containing the less soluble salt at 0ꢁC, (b) stir the
solution containing the less soluble salt at room temperature, (c) stir the
solution containing the less soluble salt at 0 ꢁC. As a result, the salt precip-
itated at moment with the conditions (a) and (c). However, the salt turned
sticky immediately once it was put at room temperature. So, it is too difficult
to filter the salt. With condition (b), the salt precipitated in half to 1 h and
the salt was powdered; the yield of the salt was 82%. However, the enantio-
purity of the salt was poor, and the de value was 23%. When the solution was
stayed at room temperature for 7 days, the precipitation was spherical,
which was easy to filter, and the enantiopurity of the salt was high, the ee
value was 98%. So, it was the best choice for obtaining the best salt when
staying the solution for 7 days at room temperature.
1003, 990, 906, 863, 815, 791, 737 cmꢂ1 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d
;
7.90–7.81 (m, 1H), 7.77 (t, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.27
(dd, J = 8.6, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 4.12–4.05 (m, 2H), 4.01 (ddd, J = 11.9, 9.1,
4.4 Hz, 1H), 3.02 (dd, J = 12.8, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 2.88 (dd, J = 12.8, 7.1 Hz, 1H).
13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) d 159.2, 149.1, 130.0, 121.6, 116.1, 108.9,
70.8, 70.0, 43.7. HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C9H12N2O4 [M + H]+: 213.0797,
found 213.0870. ½aꢃD20 = +2.5 (c 1.0, Methanol).
(S)-7. Yield: 86%; mp: 125–129 ꢁC; IR (KBr): 3354, 3298, 3076, 2933,
2883, 2831, 2717, 1622, 1606, 1593, 1498, 1451, 1344, 1270, 1179, 1112,
1090, 982, 939, 861, 824, 752, 683 cmꢂ1 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d
;
8.32–8.17 (m, 2H), 7.08–6.93 (m, 2H), 4.14–4.05 (m, 2H), 4.01 (ddd,
J = 9.3, 7.2, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 3.03 (dd, J = 12.8, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 2.87 (dd, J = 12.8,
Chirality DOI 10.1002/chir