A. H. Sato et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 1309–1311
1311
Press: London; (c) Brandsma, L. Preparative Polar Organometallic Chemistry 2;
(4a–4i), and the transformation also worked well in the presence of
functional groups such as OMe and CN (4j–4m). The reactions at
gram-scale successfully performed in 4f, 4g, 4j, 4k, and 4m. The
synthesis of 4n–4s derived from aliphatic alkynes proceeded very
well, although 4t decomposed in the process of column chroma-
tography: at the present time it is difficult to predict which prod-
Springer: Berlin, 1990; (d) Schlosser, M. In Organometallics in Synthesis
Manual; Schlosser, M., Ed., 2nd ed.; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2002; pp 1–352.
A
8. (a) Neumann, H.; Seebach, D. Chem. Ber. 1978, 111, 2785; (b) Evans, D. A.;
Crawford, T. C.; Thomas, R. C.; Walker, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 3947.
9. Galli, C.; Rappoport, Z. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 580.
10. (a) Funk, R. L.; Hentley, R. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 6671; (b) Heffernan, S.;
Carbery, D. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 5180.
11. (a) Yu, Z.; Jin, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2000, 122, 9840; (b) Liu, X.; Henderson, J. A.;
Sasaki, T.; Kishi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 16678.
12. (a) Reddy, Ch. K.; Periasamy, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1919, 1990, 31; (b) Stewart, L.
J.; Gray, D.; Pagni, R. N.; Kabalka, G. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 4497; (c)
Stone, H.; Schecher, H. Org. Syn. Coll. 1963, 4, 543.
13. (a) Kropp, P. J.; Craword, S. D. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 3102; (b) Hudrlik, P. F.;
Kulkarni, A. K.; Jain, S.; Hudrlik, A. M. Tetrahedron 1983, 39, 877; (c) Griesbaum,
K.; El-Abed, M. Chem. Ber. 2001, 1973, 106.
14. Mulder, J. A.; Kurtz, K. C. M.; Hsung, R. P.; Coverdale, H.; Frederick, M. O.; Shen,
L.; Zificsak, C. A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1547.
15. (a) Compain, G.; Jouvin, K.; Martin-Mingot, A.; Evano, G.; Marrot, J.;
Thibaudeau, S. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 5196; (b) Evano, G.; Coste, A.;
Jouvin, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 2840; (c) DeKorver, K. A.; Li, H.; Lohse,
A. G.; Hayashi, R.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Hsung, R. P. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 5064; (d)
Mulder, J. A.; Kurtz, K. C. M.; Hsung, P. R. Synlett 2003, 1379.
ucts of (E)-a-haloenamides are inclined to decompose. Notably,
all the enamides were observed as single isomers even in crude
states, and any E/Z isomeric mixtures were not obtained.
The mechanism for the resulting in perfect stereochemical con-
trol to produce only (E)-adducts is not yet fully known. Deuterioio-
dation of 1 was carried out with D2O, and the deuterium was
thoroughly incorporated for H of 2 as we expected. The result indi-
cates that this reaction does not follow a stepwise path. Possible
chelation30 of the silicon atom with the nitrogen atom and/or the
oxygen atom of the electron-withdrawing group would provide
concerted syn-addition of HI toward the triple bond.14,15,31
In conclusion, commercially available TMSI and TMSBr were
16. Sanapo, G. F.; Daoust, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 4196.
17. Noyori, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2008.
found to convert ynamides into (E)-a-haloenamides in high yields
18. The regioelectivity of the products in this paper is different from the previous
report (Ref. 19) in which addition of HI to ethynylarenes using TMSI–H2O
system preferentially gave anti-style products. In the above-mentioned
meaning, we used the word ‘specific’ as a sense of ‘ynamide-specific’.
19. Sato, A. H.; Mihara, S.; Iwasawa, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 3585.
20. Kamiya, N.; Chikami, Y.; Ishii, Y. Synlett 1990, 675.
21. (a) Zhang, Y.; Hsung, R. P.; Tracey, M. R.; Kurtz, K. C. M.; Vera, E. L. Org. Lett.
2004, 6, 1151; (b) Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, J.; Hsung, R. P.; Kurtz, K. C. M.;
Oppenheimer, J.; Petersen, M. E.; Sagamanova, I. K.; Shen, L.; Tracey, M. R. J. Org.
Chem. 2006, 71, 4170.
along with the perfect regio- and stereochemical outcomes. The
method completes the reaction quickly under routine conditions,
and was readily amenable to scale-up. This approach showed
excellent substrate compatibility, and afforded a wide variety of
new (E)-a-haloenamides. The synthetic utility of the products is
clear and we hope this reliable methodology finds widespread
use in organic synthesis. Application and mechanistic elucidation
are ongoing for further development of this reaction and will be re-
ported in due course.
22. Preparation of 1 M TMSI in CH2Cl2, see Supplementary data.
23. We prepared the authentic compound of (E)-a-fashioned 2 according to the
Ref. 14, and confirmed that its 1H NMR and 13C NMR were identical to
compound 2 derived from our method. Elemental analysis also showed good
match as described in Ref. 26.
Acknowledgments
24. Compound 2 derived from our method was converted to the corresponding
olefin using tert-BuLi for lithium–halogen exchange, and the (Z)-olefin was
obtained in 39% yield with typical coupling constants J = 9.1 Hz for cis-form. In
brief, the compound 2 was formed in (E)-fashion.
We are very grateful to Professor Michael P. Schramm at Cali-
fornia State University Long Beach for helpful discussion. We thank
Suzuken Memorial Foundation for the financial support.
25. Similar identification of the stereochemistry in the case of 4a was also ensured;
we prepared the authentic sample of (E)-a-fashioned 4a according to Hsung’s
method in Ref. 14, and its spectroscopic data was the identical to that of 4a
derived from our procedure.
Supplementary data
26. Representative procedure for (E)-a-haloenamide moieties, for 2 (Table 1, entry 3):
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
To a solution of 1 (1 mmol) in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (8 mL) at À78 °C was added
TMSI (1 M in CH2Cl2) dropwise over 5 min. After 15 min stirring, H2O
(20 mmol) was added, and the mixture was allowed to warm to 0 °C over
50 min, and followed by additional stirring for 10 min. The reaction was
quenched at 0 °C with saturated aqueous sodium thiosulfate, stirred for
30 min, and allowed to warm to ambient temperature. To the mixture was
added CH2Cl2, and organic phases were washed with brine, and then dried over
Na2SO4, and concentrated to give a crude product. Purification by silica gel
column chromatography afforded 375 mg of 2 in 99% yield as yellow viscous
materials. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.38–7.28 (m, 10H), 7.17 (s, 1H), 3.74 (s,
3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 153.3, 142.2, 139.1, 135.2, 129.1, 129.02,
129.00, 127.7, 126.9, 124.5, 95.0, 54.0. MS (EI) m/z: 252 ([MÀI]+), 193
([MÀIÀCO2CH3]+). IR (neat): 3063, 2953, 1713 (C@O), 1622 (C@C),
1592 cmÀ1. Anal. Calcd for C16H14INO2: C, 50.68; H, 3.72; N, 3.69. Found: C,
50.66; H, 3.70; N, 3.76.
References and notes
1. (a) Larock, R. C. Comprehensive Organic Transformations: A Guide to Functional
Group Preparations; Wiley-VCH: New York, 1999; (b) Rappoport, Z. The
Chemistry of Enamines. In The Chemistry of Functional Groups; New York:
John Wiley and Sons, 1994.
2. (a) Shen, R.; Porco, J. A., Jr. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1333; (b) Jiang, L.; Job, G. E.;
Klapars, A.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3667.
3. For reviews on enamides, see: (a) Dehli, J. R.; Legros, J.; Bolm, C. Chem. Commun.
2005, 973; (b) Whitesell, J. K.; Whitesell, M. A. Synthesis 1983, 517; (c)
Hickmott, P. W. Tetrahedron 1975, 1982, 38; (d) Hickmott, P. W. Tetrahedron
1982, 38, 3363; (e) Lenz, G. R. Synthesis 1978, 489.
4. (a) Dekker, K. A.; Aiello, R. J.; Hirai, H.; Inagaki, T.; Sakakibara, T.; Suzuki, Y.;
Thompson, J. F.; Yamauchi, Y.; Kojima, N. J. Antibiot. 1998, 51, 14; (b) Kunze, B.;
Jansen, R.; Sasse, F.; Hofle, G.; Reichenbach, H. J. Antibiot. 1998, 51, 1075; (c) Yet,
L. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 4283.
5. For examples on synthesis of enamides, see: (a) Anthoni, U.; Bock, K.; Chevolot,
L.; Larson, C.; Nielsen, P. H.; Christophersen, C. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 5638; (b)
Lin, X.; Weinreb, S. M. Tetrahedron. Lett. 2001, 42, 2631; (c) Pinder, J. L.;
Weinreb, S. M. Tetrahedron. Lett. 2003, 44, 4141; (d) Nakamura, R.; Tanino, K.;
Miyashita, M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3583; (e) Han, C.; Shen, R.; Su, S.; Porco, J. A., Jr.
Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 27; (f) Baran, P. S.; Shenvi, R. A.; Mitsos, C. A. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3714; (g) Nishikawa, T.; Kajii, S.; Isobe, M. Synlett 2004, 2025;
(h) Sum, C.; Camp, J. E.; Weinreb, S. M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1779; (i) Palimkar, S.
S.; Uenishi, J. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4160.
27. (a) Walsh, R. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14, 246; (b) Doncaster, A. M.; Walsh, R. J.
Phys. Chem. 1979, 83, 3037.
28. Full spectroscopic data for all new compounds in Scheme 2 of 1H NMR, 13C
NMR, MS, IR, and Elemental analyses were listed in Supplementary data.
29. We actually attempted the hydroiodation of 4a under the Hsung’s condition
according to Ref. 14.
30. A competitive reaction using a mixture of 3a (1 mmol) and 3g (1 mmol) was
performed under the condition of CH2Cl2 (8 mL), 1 M TMSI (1.5 equiv).
Unexpectedly, the hydroiodation occurred in 3g predominantly: 0.97 mmol
of 4g and 0.03 mmol of 4a were yielded, and 0.03 mmol of 3g and 0.97 mmol of
3a were unreacted. This indicates that the different ability in chelation of
silicon with oxygen between 3a and 3g might regulate the activity of reagent
system.
31. The alternative to the concerted way is synchronous mechanism, see: (a)
Fishcer, J.; Steglich, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1979, 18, 167; (b) Bearpark, M.;
Bernardi, F.; Olivucci, M.; Robb, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 1732.
6. Matsubara, R.; Kobayashi, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 292. and references
therein.
7. (a) Brandsma, L.; Verkruijsse, H. Preparative Polar Organometallic Chemistry 1;
Springer: Berlin, 1987; (b) Wakefield, B. J. Organolithium Methods; Academic