1254
Z. Wang et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23 (2013) 1253–1256
more active than hit compound 1. In contrast, methoxy substitu-
tions on the benzyl ring exemplified by compounds 28 and 29 re-
sulted in a reduction in activity as compared to the phenyl
substituted compounds 21 and 22. The activity of disubstituted
methoxy phenyl compound 27 is much lower than the correspond-
ing mono-substituted compounds. Interestingly, the conversion of
a methoxy group in compound 22 to a hydroxyl group (23) abol-
ished its activity demonstrating selectivity for the methoxy
substituent.
N
N
N
CN
O
N
H
O
1
μΜ
IC50 >150
A preliminary SAR study of compound 21 using compounds in
Figure 2 indicated the important role of the amide NH and the
quinoxaline ring. Methylation of the amide NH resulted in no mea-
Figure 1. Chemical structure of quinoxaline hit compound 1.
generally obtained by coupling of commercially available cyano-
acetic acid with various amines using PyBOP and standard condi-
tions. In cases where the substituted 2,3-dichloroquinoxaline 3
was not commercially available, the preparation of the requisite
R1-substituted quinoxalines is described in Scheme 2. Condensa-
tion of R1-substituted benzene-1,2-diamine (6) with diethyl oxa-
late (7) gave the corresponding quinoxaline dione 8. Reflux of 8
in phosphorus oxychloride generated the various 2,3-dichloroqui-
noxaline analogs 3.
The ability of these analogs to block hIgG binding to shFcRn was
assessed using a FcRn–IgG competition ELISA assay as described
previously.7 Briefly, various concentrations of small molecules
were each mixed with 3 nM hIgG and incubated with shFcRn-
coated plates. The concentration required to inhibit 50% of the
surable activity up to 500
larly, inclusion of smaller pyrazine ring instead of the
quinoxaline ring in compound 33 also showed no activity up to
500 M.
lM as shown by compounds 32. Simi-
a
l
With the optimized methoxy phenyl compound 21, we next
turned our attention to examining the effect of substitution at
the 6 or 7 positions on the quinoxaline ring, as shown by com-
pounds 35–38 (Table 2). Both electron withdrawing and donating
groups were attached to the quinoxaline ring in compound 21
but both changes resulted in reductions in activity. Further exten-
sion from the 6 position of the quinoxaline ring by an amide link-
age, as shown in compounds 39–42, also resulted in a loss of
activity. 6,7-Dichloro-quinoxaline analog 38 showed only a small
threefold reduction in activity. This may suggest that only small
substitutions at the 6 and 7 positions on the quinoxaline ring are
somewhat tolerated.
We also investigated ring size and modifications at the azepane
moiety (Table 3). For example, the 7-membered ring analogs 43–
48 were aimed at modulating the activity and solubility but were
inactive. However, compound 50 with an 8-membered alkyl ring
showed similar activity as compound 21. Interestingly, 6-mem-
bered piperidine analogs 51–53 were also inactive. Connection to
the quinoxaline of various phenyl or alkyl groups by either a sec-
ondary amine or thioether (compounds 54–58) also abolished
the activity. Our SAR suggested that the unsubstituted 7 and 8
membered-alkyl rings azepane and azocane provide optimal
activity.
IgG–FcRn interaction was determined and reported as its IC50
.
Starting from the initial hit 1, we first explored the amide posi-
tion and the effect of various alkyl groups on activity (9–13, Table
1). The alkyl ether chain of compound 9 with one less methylene
had similar activity to 1 while compounds with other alkyl groups
(10–12) showed no activity which suggested a possible role for the
methoxy functional group of compound 1. Next we sought to re-
place the alkyl ether group with aryl groups as illustrated in Table
1. The unsubstituted phenyl and heteroaryl analogs (13–17)
showed no activity. However, introduction of ether a para or a
meta-substituent on the phenyl ring had significant effects on the
activity. For example, the 3-F-substituted phenyl substituent (18)
possessed an IC50 of 150
original hit compound 1. The 4-meoxyphenyl compound 22 in-
creased the activity to 50 M, which is threefold higher than com-
pound 1. Notably, the 3-methoxy phenyl compound 21 was 15-fold
lM and recapitulated the activity of the
Additional optimization efforts were directed towards
extension of the methoxy phenyl ring which proved active in
compounds 21 and 22 (Table 4). Substitutions extended from
l
H
N
N
N
Cl
Cl
N
N
Cl
a
b
R2
R1
R1
NC
+
CN
O
R2
3
4
O
N
H
N
R2
5
R1
CN
N
R2
O
N
H
2
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (a) t-BuOK, THF, reflux, 3 h (60–71%); (b) amines, Et3N, iPrOH, 80 °C, 4 h (80–90%).
O
H
N
NH2
NH2
O
O
N
N
Cl
Cl
b
a
O
R1
R1
+
R1
O
O
N
H
8
7
6
3
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) EtOH, reflux, 12 h (80–90%); (b) POCl3, reflux, 12 h (90–95%).