Page 3 of 4
New Journal of Chemistry
2,4ꢀBisꢀ(substitutedꢀphenyl)ꢀ[1,3,5]ꢀtriazineꢀ2,4,6ꢀtriamine 4(a-d)
(0.1mol), substituted benzaldehyde 5 (a-d) (0.1mol) and 2ꢀ
diluted from tube 2 to tube 9 (tube 2–9 containing 125, 62.5,
31.25, 15.62, 7.81, 3.91, 1.95, 0.97 ꢁg/mL, respectively). After
mercaptoethanethioic Sꢀacid 6 (0.1mol) were refluxed in presence 40 this process, each tube was inoculated with 0.1 mL of the
of toluene for 6ꢀ10 h. The product 7(a-l) was filtered, washed
with cold water and recrystallized with ethanol to afford the
corresponding pure product.
bacterial suspension whose concentration corresponded to 0.5
McFarland scale (9 × 108 cells/mL) and each bacterium was
incubated at 37 °C for 24 h at 150 rpm. The final volume in each
tube was 1.0 mL. The incubation chamber was kept humid. At the
45 end of the incubation period, MIC values were recorded as the
lowest concentration of the substance that gave no visible
turbidity, i.e. no growth of inoculated bacteria.
5
Table 1 Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of designed target molecules.
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (µg/mL)
Gram-positive bacteria Gram-negative bacteria
Compound
Acknowledgement
S.
B.
B.
E. coli P.
vulgaris aeruginosa
125 15.625
P.
50 Authors are thankful to Sam Higginbottom Institute of
Agriculture, Technology & Sciences, Allahabad, India for
providing necessary infrastructural facilities and Sophisticated
Analytical Instrumental Facility (SAIF), Punjab University, India
for providing the spectral data of compounds synthesized herein.
55
aureus subtilis cereus
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
7f
7g
7h
7i
62.5
125
31.25 31.25 62.5
125
31.25 7.8125 15.625 3.91
31.25 15.625 31.25
31.25 1.95 62.5 15.625
7.8125 31.25 1.95 7.8125 7.8125
15.625 31.25 62.5
31.25 62.5
125
Notes and references
a Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sam Higginbottom Institute of
Agriculture Technology and Sciences, Formerly Allahabad Agricultural
Institute, Deemed to be University, Allahabad 211007, India
60 b Anand College of Pharmacy, Agra 282007, India
c Present Address: Archimedes DoRa5 Visiting Fellow, Institute of
Chemistry, Division of Bio-organic Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry,
University of Tartu, Estonia
15.625 7.8125 125
62.5
62.5
3.91
31.25
7.8125
31.25
62.5
31.25 15.625 15.625 1.95
31.25 15.625 31.25 62.5
15.625 31.25 62.5
31.25 7.8125 15.625 31.25 125
31.25 31.25 31.25 31.25 15.625 31.25
31.25 62.5 31.25 15.625 1.95 1.95
3.91 3.91 7.8125 3.91
1.95
15.625 15.625
7j
31.25
7k
7l
65 †Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Analytical
details are given in supplementary information
DOI: 10.1039/b000000x/
Cefixime 7.8125 1.95
a Footnote text.
1. ECDC ꢂ EMEA Joint Technical Report. The bacterial challenge:time
70
75
80
to react. 2009, EMEA ꢂ 576176 ꢂ 2009.
10
2. Gahtori P, Ghosh SK. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2012, 27, 281.
3. Singh, UP, Bhat, HR, Gahtori, P. J. Mycol. Med. 2012, 22, 134.
4. Kumar, R, Gupta, L, Pal, P, Khan, S, Singh, N, Katiyar, SB, Meena,
S, Sarkar, J, Sinha, S, Kanaujiya, JK, Lochab, S, Trivedi, AK,
Chauhan, PM. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 2265.
5. Gahtori, P, Ghosh, SK, Parida, P, Prakash, A, Gogoi, K, Bhat, HR,
Singh, UP. Exp. Parasitol. 2012, 130, 292
6. Lozano, V, Aguado, L, Hoorelbeke, B, Renders, M, Camarasa, MJ,
Schols, D, Balzarini, J, SanꢀFélix, A, PérezꢀPérez, MJ. J Med
Chem. 2011, 54, 5335.
Antibacterial Screening
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration
All the synthesized compounds were screened for their minimum
15 inhibitory concentration (MIC, ꢁg/mL) against selected Gramꢀ
positive organisms viz. Bacillus subtilis (NCIMꢀ2063), Bacillus
cereus (NCIMꢀ2156), Staphylococcus aureus (NCIMꢀ2079) and
Gramꢀnegative organism viz. Escherichia coli (NCIMꢀ2065),
Proteus vulgaris (NCIMꢀ2027) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
20 (NCIMꢀ2036), by the broth dilution method as recommended by
the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards with
minor modifications.13 Cefixime was used as standard
antibacterial agent. Solutions of the test compounds and reference
drug were prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at
25 concentrations of 125, 62.5, 31.25, 15.62, 7.81, 3.91, 1.95, 0.97
ꢁg/mL. Ten tubes were prepared in duplicate with the second set
being used as MIC reference controls (16–24 h visual). After
sample preparation, the controls were placed in a 37 °C incubator
and read for macroscopic growth (clear or turbid) the next day.
30 Into each tube, 0.8 mL of nutrient broth was pipette (tubes 2–7),
tube 1 (negative control) received 1.0 mL of nutrient broth and
tube 10 (positive control) received 0.9 mL of nutrient. Tube 1, the
negative control, did not contain bacteria or antibiotic. The
positive control, tube 10, received 0.9 mL of nutrient broth since
35 it contained bacteria but not antibiotic. The test compound were
dissolved in DMSO (125 ꢁg/mL), 0.1 mL of increasing
concentration of the prepared test compounds which are serially
7. Singh, UP, Singh, RK, Bhat, HR, Subhashchandra, YP, Kumar, V,
Kumawat, MK, Gahtori, P. Med. Chem. Res. 2011, 20, 1603.
8. Gahtori, P, Gosh, SK, Singh, B, Singh UP, Bhat HR, Uppal A. Saudi
Pharm. J. 2011, 20, 35.
85 9. Ghosh, SK, Singh, UP, Bhat, HR, Gahtori, P. Lett. Drug Des. Disc.
2012, 9, 329.
10. Singh, UP, Pathak, MK, Bhat, HR, Gahtori, P, Singh, RK. Chem.
Biol. Drug Des. 2012, 80, 572.
11. Singh, UP, Dubey, V, Bhat, HR. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2012, 80,
90
95
598.
12. Bhat, HR, Gupta, SK, Singh UP. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 12690ꢀ12695.
13. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. (1982)
Standard Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test for
Bacteria Which Grow Aerobically. Villanova: NCCLS; p. 242.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry [year]
Journal Name, [year], [vol], 00–00 | 3