Samarium(II) iodide has become the reagent of choice for
the formation of ketyl radicals;10 however, use of SmI2
commonly leads to a preference for the formation of anti-
products upon cyclization with acrylate acceptors. This
reagent may therefore not enable us to directly access the
required syn-arrangement of alcohol and acetate substitu-
ents flanking the C4ꢀC5 bond in A. Use of tributyltin
hydride to generate ketyl radicals typically results in the
formation of mixtures of diastereomers,11 with the addi-
tion of Lewis acids also allowing anti-selectivity to be
achieved.12 However, wehavedemonstratedcasesinwhich
the use of tributyltin hydride can lead to preferential
formation ofsyn-isomers from β-alkoxyacrylate systems.13
Despite the extensive use of ketyl radical cycliza-
tions with acrylate acceptors,10,14 the use of hindered
β-disubstituted acrylate systems as ketyl radical acceptors
appears to have been used on limited occasions.15 To
explore the proposed cyclization we first prepared the
aldehyde substrate 13 (Scheme 1), anticipating that this
model system would also give us access to longianone (8).
Aldehyde 13 was obtained in three steps (64% yield) from
alcohol 9 and acetylene 10, the (E)-configuration being
formed exclusively upon conjugate addition of 9 with 10
in the presence of PMe3.16 Heating a solution of 13 with
tributyltin hydride (1.3 equiv) and AIBN (0.2 equiv) led
to the formation of two products that were identified as the
syn-14 and anti-15 substituted furans that were isolated
in 34% and 38% yields, respectively, the less polar syn-
product having undergone lactonization in situ.17 Orga-
notin byproducts from the reaction mixture were removed
efficiently by filtration through a short column of 10%
KF-silica prior to further chromatographic purification.18
The anti-product 15 was then converted to dihydrolongia-
none (17)6,19 by oxidation of the secondary alcohol using
Swern conditions to form ketone 16 followed by deprotec-
tion of the primary alcohol using DDQ and acid-catalyzed
lactonization (56% yield, three steps).20 Dihydrolongia-
none has previously been converted to 8 by oxidation using
Figure 1. (A) Naturally occurring 1,7-dioxaspiro[4.4]nonanes
and cometabolites. (B) Retrosynthesis of dioxaspirononanes
using a “conventional” intramolecular hetero-Michael addition
strategy and ketyl radical cyclization strategy.
the synthesis of dioxaspirononanes take advantage of the
nucleophilic behavior of a tetheredprimaryalcohol suchas
B (Figure 1B) that can undergo an intramolecular hetero-
Michael addition (IHMA) to form the CꢀO bond of the
spiro center in spirocycle A,7b,fꢀh,8 in a reverse manner
to that which is proposed to occur biosynthetically. We
identified a less intuitive disconnection of the secosyrin
dioxaspiro framework A that would involve a ketyl radical
cyclization of substrate C to form the C4ꢀC5 bond. This
strategy would allow formation of the adjacent C4
(secondary alcohol) and C5 (spiro) stereocenters in a single
step. With the existing C3 asymmetric center expected to
impart favorable diastereocontrol during formation of the
C5 center,9 the ability to control the relative stereochem-
istry between the C4 and C5 centers is of importance.
(11) Enholm, E. J.; Prasad, G. TetrahedronLett. 1989, 30, 4939–4942.
(12) Enholm, E. J.; Allais, F.; Bareyt, S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2003, 14, 2871–2874.
(13) Donner, C. D. Synthesis 2010, 415–420.
(14) For a review, see: (a) Srikanth, G. S. C.; Castle, S. L. Tetrahedron
2005, 61, 10377–10441. Selected examples involving β-alkoxyacrylates
include: (b) Kerrigan, N. J.; Upadhyay, T.; Procter, D. J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2004, 45, 9087–9090. (c) Takahashi, S.; Kubota, A.; Nakata, T.
Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1353–1356. (d) Matsuo, G.; Kadohama, H.; Nakata,
T. Chem. Lett. 2002, 148–149.
(15) (a) Suzuki, K.; Matsukura, H.; Matsuo, G.; Koshino, H.;
Nakata, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 8653–8655. (b) Enholm, E. J.;
Burroff, J. A. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 13583–13602. (c) Kang, H.-Y.; Koh,
H. Y.; Chang, M. H.; Hwang, J.-T.; Shim, S. C. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc.
1994, 15, 710–712. (d) Enholm, E. J.; Satici, H.; Trivellas, A. J. Org.
Chem. 1989, 54, 5841–5843.
(7) (a) Mukai, C.; Moharram, S. M.; Hanaoka, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1997, 38, 2511–2512. (b) Yu, P.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Z. Y.; Mak, T. C. W.;
Wong, H. N. C. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 6359–6366. (c) Mukai, C.;
Moharram, S. M.; Azukizawa, S.; Hanaoka, M. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
8095–8103. (d) Carda, M.; Castillo, E.; Rodrıguez, S.; Falomir, E.;
´
(16) Inanaga, J.; Baba, Y.; Hanamoto, T. Chem. Lett. 1993, 22, 241–
244.
Marco, J. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 8895–8896. (e) Donohoe, T. J.;
Fisher, J. W.; Edwards, P. J. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 465–467. (f) Koumbis,
A. E.; Varvogli, A.-A. C. Synlett 2006, 3340–3342. (g) Gautam, D.; Rao,
B. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 1693–1695. (h) Varvogli, A.-A. C.;
Karagiannis, I. N.; Koumbis, A. E. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 1048–1058.
(8) (a) Lykakis, I. N.; Zaravinos, I.-P.; Raptis, C.; Stratakis, M.
J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 6339–6342. (b) Perali, R. S.; Kalapati, S.
Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 3725–3728.
(17) Whilst use of SmI2 has not been attempted, reaction of 13 with
(TMS)3SiH/AIBN led to complete recovery of the starting aldehyde.
(18) Harrowven, D. C.; Guy, I. L. Chem. Commun. 2004, 1968–1969.
(19) Aitken, H. M.; Schiesser, C. H.; Donner, C. D. Aust. J. Chem.
2011, 64, 409–415.
(20) The spectroscopic data for 17 were identical to material we had
prepared previously via an acyl radical cyclization (ref 19) and also to the
data reported for dihydrolongianone 17 formed by reduction of the
natural product longianone 8 (ref 6).
(9) Beckwith, A. L. J. Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 3073–3100.
(10) Edmonds, D. J.; Johnston, D.; Procter, D. J. Chem. Rev. 2004,
104, 3371–3403.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 6, 2013
1259