aspects of the reaction. Copper catalysis led to disappoint-
ing results; under our previously reported conditions
using Togni reagent I,4 the starting material was largely
consumed (>90%), but less than 5% of 2a was formed
to the identification of the best reaction conditions: 1 equiv
of allylsilane 1a, 1.8 equiv of reagent I (or III), 5 mol % of
Ru(bpy)3Cl2 6H2O, MeOH (EtOH for III) at rt with
exposure of the reaction vessel to one household 14 W
light bulb over 48 h (entry 6). Notably, the stereoselectivity
of the trifluoromethylation was found to be dependent on
the CF3 source with Umemoto reagent III affording 2a
with the most favorable E/Z ratio.
The next experiments were designed to probe the reac-
tion’s tolerance to various degrees of substitution and to
study its stereochemical course. Conditions B (Togni I)
and/or C (Umemoto III) were considered for comparative
purposes (Table 2).
3
(entry 1). Gratifyingly, the visible lightꢀexcited Ru(bpy)3Cl2
3
6H2O catalyst provided 2a under various conditions.
Control experiments established the authenticity of the
photoredox concept (entries 2 and 3) and the importance
of the silyl group.7 Togni reagent I and Umemoto reagent
III outperformed Togni reagent II, CF3I, and CF3SO2Cl
in terms of conversion and/or selectivity. For III, we
noted little influence of the counteranion and observed
transesterification of both 1a and 2a when the reaction
solvent was methanol (entries 13ꢀ17). CF3I led to tri-
fluoromethylation (E/Z ratio ∼1) but only in the pres-
ence of i-Pr2NEt (entries 18ꢀ19).8 This observation con-
trasts with the detrimental effect of i-Pr2NEt when using
Togni reagent I (entry 5). The optimum solvent for this
reaction is MeOH (EtOH for III). These initial studies led
The desired allyl CF3 product was predominant with
traces of unidentified but separable byproducts. Typically,
higher yields were observed with reagent I, but III was
superior in terms of E-selectivity. Careful analysis of
the crude reaction mixture for the trifluoromethylation
of anti R-substituted β-silyl-(E)-crotylsilanes 1eꢀh7 revealed
that, out of the four possible isomers that could be obtained,
the syn-(E) branched CF3 allylic products were predomi-
nantly formed. In this series, the E/Z ratio is typically high,
but significant quantities of the anti-isomers were formed.
The stereochemical outcome of the reaction was found to be
sensitive to the substitution pattern of the substrates and
the CF3 source. For the assignment of the relative stereo-
chemistry, 2f (major isomer) was subjected to sequential
alkene then ester reduction, followed by esterification.
The resulting saturated ester, 2-benzyl-6,6,6-trifluoro-5-
methylhexyl 3,5-dinitrobenzoate 3, was characterized
by single-crystal X-ray diffraction.7 The assignment of
the relative stereochemistry of syn-2f indicates that the
silyl group is regio- and stereodirecting, with the sense of
stereocontrol being consistent with the well-established
anti-SE20 mode of addition observed for electrophiles other
than the putative CF3• species formed under the reaction
conditions.9 The trifluoromethylation of 1h gave the CF3-
substituted amino ester 2h following selective Boc depro-
tection (entry 7). The syn β-silyl-(E)-crotylsilane 1i also
responded totrifluoromethylation and led preferentially to
anti-(E)-2i in >70% yield (entry 8). The trifluoromethyla-
tion was applied to allylsilanes that are structurally differ-
ent from 1aꢀi. Theterminal linearallylsilane (E)-1j reacted
under the reaction conditions B togivethe desired terminal
branched allylic CF3 product 2j in 44% yield along with
an additional separable silylated product identified as 4
(33%) (entry 9). This side reaction indicates that the
addition of the CF3 group is not regioselective for this
substrate; the allylsilanes 1aꢀi therefore benefit from the
steric constraint imposed by the proximal stereogenic sily-
lated carbon for optimum regiocontrol during CꢀCF3 bond
formation. For 1k, both the trimethylsilyl and the phenyl
Table 1. Trifluoromethylation of Allylsilane 1a
entry CF3
condb
CuCle
convc,d (%) yieldc,d (%) E/Z ratiod
a
1
I
91
<5
<5
45
30
90
18
42
89
<5
<5
<5
82i
74
75i
>99
76
<5
48
48
66
<5
<5
1.4
f
2
I
no Ru
f
3
I
no light
4
I
27
f
2.5
5
I
iPr2NEtg
48 h
6
Ih
I
55
17
22
1.7
2.2
1.7
1.8
7
MeCN
CH2Cl2
DMF
8
I
9
I
37
f
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
II
II
II
III
III
IIIk
III
III
IV
IV
V
f
f
MeCN
DMF
30j
38j
34j
7
5.3
3.4
4
EtOH, 48 h
MeCN
DMF
8
33
5.4
iPr2NEtg
44
17
10
1
4.2
3
V
DMF
V
MeCN
a 1.2 equiv for IꢀIII and V; 10 equiv for CF3I (IV). b Variation from
(7) For details (e.g., the synthesis of the starting materials), see the
Supporting Information.
(8) The tertiary amine could serve as a sacrificial reductant and/or
quench deleterious HI byproduct.
(9) (a) Masse, C. E.; Panek, J. S. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 1293–1316. (b)
Fleming, I.; Barbero, A.; Walter, D. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 2063–2192. (c)
Chabaud, L.; James, P.; Landais, Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 3173–
3199.
the standard conditions detailed in the scheme. c Conv refers to con-
sumption of 1a and yield refers to the formation of 2a. d Analysis by 19
F
NMR with C6H5F as internal standard. e Conditions for the reaction:
20 mol % of CuCl, MeOH, 70 °C, 2 h. f No product. g 2.0 equiv of
iPr2NEt. h 1.8 equiv of I. i Transesterification of 1a and 2a. j Yield of
isolated 2a. k BF4ꢀ as counteranion.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX