Organic Letters
Letter
boronic acids as an alkyl radical source. We hypothesized that
benzenesulfinates, which can be obtained from alkenyl
sulfones, could effectively activate boronic acids and thus
avoid the need for an additional Lewis base. Herein we now
report that we have indeed succeeded in developing a protocol
for mild, visible-light-mediated alkenylation reactions of a wide
array of boronic acids directly, without the need for an external
activator (Scheme 1C).
With the optimized conditions in hand, we explored the
scope of the reaction with respect to the alkenyl sulfone
(Scheme 2). Reactions between cyclohexylboronic acid and
Scheme 2. Scope of the Reaction with Respect to the
a
Alkenyl Sulfone
To optimize the reaction conditions, we used phenyl trans-
styryl sulfone (1, 1.0 equiv) and cyclohexylboronic acid (2, 2.0
equiv) as model substrates (Table 1). First, several different
a
Table 1. Optimization of Conditions
b
entry
solvent
base
yield (%)
1
2
3
4
DCM
K2HPO4
K2HPO4
K2HPO4
K2CO3
K3PO4
K3PO4
K3PO4
K3PO4
K3PO4
K3PO4
K3PO4
no base
K3PO4
44
51
57
60
67
75
89 (80 )
78
62
NR
NR
trace
42
DCM/EA = 2:1
DCM/EA = 2:1
DCM/EA = 2:1
DCM/EA = 2:1
DCM/EA = 2:1
DCM/EA = 2:1
DCM/EA = 2:1 (0.13 M)
DCM/EA = 2:1 (0.2 M)
DCM/EA = 2:1
DCM/EA = 2:1
DCM/EA = 2:1
DCM/EA = 2:1
5
c
6
cd
,
e
7
8
cdf
, ,
cdg
, ,
9
c dh
, ,
10
11
12
13
c di
,
,
c dj
,
,
c dk
,
,
a
Reaction conditions, unless otherwise noted: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.4
mmol), Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbbpy)PF6 (0.004 mmol), base (0.4
b
mmol), solvent (2 mL), rt, Ar atmosphere, 24 h. Yields were
1
determined by H NMR spectroscopy with dibromomethane as an
c
a
internal standard. NR = no reaction. 2 (4 equiv., 0.8 mmol), 36 h.
Reactions were performed on a 0.2 mmol scale, and isolated yields
d
e
f
b
Base (1.5 equiv., 0.3 mmol). Isolated yield. Solvent (1.5 mL, 0.13
are given. Reactions were performed under 450 nm LED irradiation.
g
h
i
j
M). Solvent (1 mL, 0.2 M). No photocatalyst. No light. No base.
k
Air atmosphere.
various sulfones with electron-donating or electron-with-
drawing substituents all gave moderate yields (52−87%) of
the desired products (4−9 and 10−13, respectively).
Fluorinated and brominated sulfones (14 and 16) gave higher
yields than a chlorinated sulfone (15), and para substitution
(14) resulted in a higher yield than ortho substitution (17).
Naphthyl, pyridyl, and 1,1-disubstituted alkenyl compounds
were also suitable, affording the desired products 18−20 in
moderate yields (38−63%). In addition, we were delighted to
find that ((2-phenylallyl)sulfonyl)benzene and 1-chloro-4-(3-
(phenylsulfonyl)prop-1-en-2-yl)benzene could also be used as
radical acceptors; when they were subjected to the alkenylation
conditions, the desired products 21 and 22 were obtained in
moderate yields. We continued to explore other vinyl
compounds, such as thiophene (23) and benzothiazole (24),
all of which were obtained in moderate yields (59 and 65%).
We were pleasantly surprised to find that when we used alkynyl
sulfone as a free-radical acceptor, the products (25 and 26)
were still obtained in moderate yields (74 and 70%). As for Z/
E geometry,18 unfortunately, in our reaction system, we could
not increase its ratio. (See the SI.)
solvents were screened with Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbbpy)PF6 as
the photocatalyst and K2HPO4 as the base under irradiation
with a 26 W blue LED for 24 h at room temperature (entries
1−3). We were pleased to find that the desired product 3
could be obtained in 57% yield from the reaction in 2:1 (v/v)
dichloromethane/ethyl acetate. When we varied the base, we
discovered that K3PO4 gave a slightly higher yield than
K2HPO4 and K2CO3 (compare entries 3−5). When we
increased the amount of 2 from 2.0 to 4.0 equiv and the
reaction time from 24 to 36 h, the yield further increased to
75% (entry 6). Simultaneously reducing the amount of base
from 2 to 1.5 equiv afforded the highest yield (89% by NMR,
80% isolated; entry 7). Increasing the concentration of the
reactants (entries 8 and 9) was detrimental. Control
experiments showed that the reaction failed to proceed in
the absence of light, base, or photocatalyst (entries 10−12).
Under air, 3 was obtained in 42% yield (entry 13). Then, we
screened the photocatalyst. The desired product 3 was
obtained in excellent yield when 2 mol % of Ir[dF(CF3)-
ppy]2(dtbbpy)PF6 was used as the photocatalyst. (See the SI.)
Then, the light source was screened. All light sources could
provide products in excellent yield (see the SI), and the yield
would increase slightly when we used 450 nm light.
Next we explored the scope of the reaction with respect to
the alkyl boronic acid by using methyl (E)-4-(2-
(phenylsulfonyl)vinyl)benzoate or (E)-4-(2-(phenylsulfonyl)-
2478
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 2477−2481