Metal-Ion-Responsive Helix-Forming Lysine–Coumarin–Azacrown Foldamers
FULL PAPER
to give OPLM1 as an orange solid (468 mg, 0.50 mmol). Yield 67%; m.p.
107–1098C; Rf =0.39 (CH2Cl2/MeOH, 95:5); H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3/
Conclusion
1
drops CD3OD): d=7.76 (s, 1H), 7.74–7.70 (m, 4H), 7.57–7.56 (m, 2H),
7.35 (dd, J=8.0, 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.30–7.25 (m, 3H), 6.72 (t, J=5.2 Hz; NH),
6.59 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H), 6.54 (d, J=10.8 Hz, 1H), 6.48 (s, 1H), 5.91–5.81
(m, 1H), 5.60 (d, J=8.0 Hz; NH), 5.28 (d, J=17.2 Hz, 1H), 5.21 (d, J=
10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.59 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 2H), 4.40–4.36 (dd, J=7.6, 7.2 Hz, 1H),
4.33–4.27 (m, 2H), 4.17 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 3.96 (s, 2H), 3.73 (t, J=
6.0 Hz, 4H), 3.64–3.55 (m, 16H), 3.27–3.22 (m, 2H), 3.09 (s, 3H), 1.70–
1.65 (m, 2H), 1.55–1.48 (m, 2H), 1.36–1.26 ppm (m, 2H); 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3): d=188.6, 171.3, 168.0, 158.9, 155.9, 155.4, 152.5,
151.1, 144.5, 143.2 (ꢁ2), 140.6, 131.8, 131.0, 129.6, 127.2, 126.6, 124.6 (ꢁ
2), 123.7, 120.5, 119.5, 118.4, 110.2, 109.8, 108.7, 98.0, 71.1, 70.1, 69.8,
68.0, 66.8, 65.8, 57.1, 53.9, 52.8, 47.2, 39.9, 39.0, 31.9, 29.1, 22.8 ppm; IR
(KBr): n˜ =1722, 1677 cmÀ1 (C=O); HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for
C53H60N4O12: 944.4208; found: 945.4276 (M+H+).
In summary, our studies outline the structural design of a
metal-ion-responsive and fluorescence-detectable foldamer,
OPLM8, that is capable of undergoing folding/unfolding
transitions upon alkaline earth metal-ion complexation.
Even the short l-lysine-based octamer could fold into a
stable helical conformation through the coordination inter-
action between the metal-ion chelators and the alkaline
earth metal ions. The metal-ion-induced suprastructural
changes in the synthetic foldamer could be easily probed by
changes in the fluorescence intensities with concomitant
changes in the CD signals. In addition, we have demonstrat-
ed that the helix formation is indeed induced by the forma-
tion of sandwich complexes between groups at an i, i+4
spacing through systematic variation of the sequences in a
series of control foldamers. The magnitude of the circular
dichroism effect showed a linear correlation with the
number of sandwich complexes formed.
General procedure for selective deprotection of an allyl group using a
Pd0 catalyst:[21] The allyl-protected compound was dissolved in dry DMF
under oxygen-free N2 and then
a catalytic amount of [PdACHTUNGTRENNUNG(PPh3)4]
(10 mol%) and N-methylaniline (0.3 mol%) were added. The mixture
was stirred at ambient temperature for 8 h. After the reaction was com-
plete, the excess DMF was removed and the crude mixture was purified
by centrifugation. The residue was redissolved in a small volume of
CH2Cl2, precipitated with an eight-fold volume of hexane, and then puri-
fied by centrifugation at 5500 rpm for 15 min in a glass tube. The super-
natant was removed. The precipitate was redissolved in CH2Cl2 and the
washing procedure was repeated three times to obtain the pure com-
pound.
Experimental Section
General: All chemicals were purchased from commercial sources and
were used as received. Solvents used for syntheses were dried by stand-
ard literature methods before being distilled and stored under nitrogen
General procedure for selective deprotection of an Fmoc group by using
20% piperidine in DMF: The Fmoc-protected compound was dissolved
in CH2Cl2, and then 20% piperidine in DMF was added. The mixture
was stirred at ambient temperature for about 10–20 min (TLC monitor-
ing). The solvents were removed in vacuo and the crude mixture was pu-
rified by centrifugation. It should be noted that heating during drying of
the crude product causes an unwanted side reaction. The residue was re-
dissolved in a small volume of CH2Cl2, precipitated with an eight-fold
volume of hexane, and then purified by centrifugation at 5500 rpm for
15 min in a glass tube. The supernatant was removed. The precipitate
was redissolved in CH2Cl2 and the washing procedure was repeated three
times to obtain the pure compound.
1
over 4 ꢂ molecular sieves. H (400 MHz) and 13C (100 MHz) NMR spec-
tra were recorded on a Varian Mercury 400 spectrometer. 13C (200 MHz)
NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVIII 800 MHz spectrometer.
Chemical shifts were referenced to selected residual proton peaks of the
deuterated solvents and are reported in dACTHNUTRGNEUNG
(ppm). 1H NMR data are re-
ported in the following order: chemical shift, multiplicity (s=singlet, d=
doublet, t=triplet, q=quartet, m=multiplet, br=broad), coupling con-
stant(s) in Hertz, number of protons. Melting points were determined on
a Fargo MP-1D melting point apparatus without correction. ESI mass
spectra were recorded on a Waters Micromassꢃ LCT Premier XE system.
MALDI-TOF mass spectra were recorded on a Bruker Autoflex III
TOF/TOF instrument using 4-hydroxy-a-cyanocinnamic acid (a-CHC)
and 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB) as matrices.
General procedure for amide coupling: Amides were prepared from the
corresponding carboxylic acids and amines through amide-bond forma-
tion. DCC (2.3 equiv), HOBt (2.3 equiv), and a catalytic amount of
DMAP (0.24 equiv) were added to a solution of the amine (1.0 equiv)
and carboxylic acid (1.02 equiv) in dry CH2Cl2. The products became
more viscous as the number of repeating units increased. The use of a
mixed solvent of CH2Cl2/DMF facilitated the coupling reaction and im-
proved the product yield. After confirming completion of the reaction by
TLC, the solvents were removed under vacuum and the residue was puri-
fied by flash column chromatography on silica gel eluting with different
ratios of CH2Cl2/MeOH to give the desired compounds.
Synthesis of compound AcidAC: A 0.5m aqueous lithium hydroxide solu-
tion (5.6 mL) was added to a solution of EsterAC (1.43 g, 2.52 mmol) in
MeOH (25 mL) and the reaction mixture was stirred for 2 h at reflux.
After confirming completion of the reaction by TLC, the reaction mix-
ture was neutralized with acidic resin, filtered, and concentrated to leave
a crude solid, which was purified by flash column chromatography on
silica gel eluting with CH2Cl2/MeOH/acetic acid (9:1:0.01) to give
AcidAC as an orange solid (1.19 g, 2.14 mmol). Yield 82%; Rf =0.14
(CH2Cl2/MeOH, 9:1); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3/drops CD3OD): d=
7.73 (s, 1H), 7.52 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.18 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.49–6.45
(m, 3H), 6.31 (s, 1H), 3.99 (s, 2H), 3.59–3.58 (m, 4H), 3.47–3.44 (m,
16H), 2.99 ppm (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d=189.9, 170.9,
160.0, 156.2, 153.2, 151.3, 146.0, 131.9, 129.9, 123.6, 118.4, 110.2, 109.7,
108.0, 97.2, 70.5, 69.7, 69.3, 67.7, 53.5, 52.3, 39.3 ppm; IR (KBr): n˜ =1716,
1685 cmÀ1 (C=O); HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C29H34N2O9: 554.2264;
found 577.0837 (M+Na+).
Synthesis of OPLM2: Coupling of OPLM1-COOH (340 mg, 0.38 mmol)
with OPLM1-NH2 (266 mg, 0.37 mmol) in the presence of DCC (180 mg,
0.87 mmol), HOBt (117 mg, 0.87 mmol), and DMAP (11 mg, 0.09 mmol)
gave OPLM2 (518 mg, 0.32 mmol) as an orange solid. Yield 87%; m.p.
1
118–1208C; Rf =0.10 (CH2Cl2/MeOH, 95:5); H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3/
drops CD3OD): d=7.75 (s, 1H), 7.71 (s, 1H), 7.66–7.62 (m, 6H), 7.59–
7.55 (NH), 7.50–7.48 (m, 2H), 7.41 (m, 2H), 7.34–7.16 (m, 4H), 6.55–6.50
(m, 6H), 6.41 (s, 2H), 6.10 (d, J=7.6 Hz; NH), 5.79–5.73 (m, 1H), 5.19
(d, J=16.8 Hz, 1H), 5.11 (d, J=10.4 Hz, 1H), 4.47–4.42 (br, 3H), 4.20 (d,
J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 4.14 (m, 1H), 4.07–4.03 (m, 1H), 4.00–3.93 (br, 3H),
3.68–3.50 (br, 40H), 3.26–3.18 (br, 4H), 3.10 (s, 3H), 3.03 (s, 3H), 1.78–
1.21 ppm (br, 12H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d=189.4, 189.2, 172.0,
171.6, 169.0, 168.6, 159.7, 159.5, 156.3, 155.9, 153.2, 153.1, 151.4, 145.3,
145.0, 143.6, 143.4, 140.9, 132.1, 131.4, 130.0, 129.9, 127.4, 126.9, 126.8,
124.9, 124.0, 119.9, 119.7, 118.4, 110.4, 110.1, 108.6, 108.4, 97.9, 71.1, 70.1,
69.8, 67.9, 66.8, 65.6, 56.8, 56.6, 54.6, 52.8, 52.2, 47.0, 40.3, 40.0, 39.0, 38.4,
32.5, 30.7, 28.9, 28.5, 22.6, 22.3 ppm; IR (KBr): n˜ =1720, 1679 cmÀ1 (C=
Synthesis of OPLM1: DCC (353 mg, 1.74 mmol), HOBt (233 mg,
1.73 mmol), and a catalytic amount of DMAP (23 mg, 0.17 mmol) were
added to a solution of AcidAC (414 mg, 0.75 mmol) and Ne-amino-
[20]
Boc1 (315 mg, 0.77 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (18 mL) and the reaction mix-
ture was stirred at room temperature for 14 h. After confirming comple-
tion of the reaction by TLC, the mixture was filtered though a pad of
cotton to remove most of the by-product (N,N’-dicyclohexylurea). The
filtrate was concentrated and purified by flash column chromatography
on silica gel eluting with a gradient of CH2Cl2/MeOH (from 95:5 to 9:1)
Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 2531 – 2538
ꢀ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
2537