1562
G. Compain et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 21 (2013) 1555–1563
0
102.2 (d, CHF, J = 240 Hz, C3 ), 114.5 (2CH, C3 and C5), 126.9 (C1),
130.0 (2CH, C2 and C6), 154.2 (C4). 19F{1H} NMR (CD3OD,
376 MHz, ppm) d: ꢀ134.23. MS (IES+, ACN): m/z 267 [M+H]+. HRMS
(ESI, CH3OH): m/z 273.0485 (m/z theoretical: 273.04853) [M+H]+.
Acknowledgments
This work was financed in part by an FP7 EU grant (METOXIA)
to CTS and from the CNRS, the University of Poitiers and the Region
Poitou-Charentes (grant to GC).
4.1.15. Formation of compound 20: 4-amino-N-(3,3-difluoro
propyl)benzenesulfonamide
References and notes
This compound was obtained from substrate 18 (247 mg,
1 mmol) following the general procedure at ꢀ20 °C for 40 min with
a mixture of HF/SbF5 (12.1 mol % SbF5, 3 mL). The reaction crude
was purified with the eluent dichloromethane/methanol: 99.5/0.5
to 96/4, thereby obtaining compound 20 (141 mg, 56%) as a white
solid (mp: 72–75 °C). 1H NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz, ppm) d: 1.97 (m,
1. (a) Krishnamurthy, V. M.; Kaufman, G. K.; Urbach, A. R.; Gitlin, I.; Gudiksen, K.
L.; Weibel, D. B.; Whitesides, G. M. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 946; (b) Supuran, C. T.
Nat. Rev. Drug. Discovery 2008, 7, 168; (c) Supuran, C. T. Future Med. Chem. 2011,
3, 1165.
2. Supuran, C. T. In Drug Design of Zinc-Enzyme Inhibitors Functional, Structural, and
Disease Applications; Supuran, C. T., Winum, J. Y., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken (NJ),
2009; pp 15–38.
3. (a) Marquis, R. E.; Whitson, J. T. Drugs Aging 2005, 22, 1; (b) Vullo, D.; Innocenti,
A.; Nishimori, I.; Pastorek, J.; Scozzafava, A.; Pastorekova, S.; Supuran, C. T.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 963; (c) Santos, M. A.; Marques, S.; Gil, M.;
Tegoni, M.; Scozzafava, A.; Supuran, C. T.; Enzyme Inhib, J. Med. Chem. 2003, 18,
233; (d) Loiselle, F. B.; Morgan, P. E.; Alvarez, B. V.; Casey, J. R. Am. J. Physiol. Cell.
Physiol. 2004, 286, 1423; (e) Rivera, C.; Voipio, J.; Kaila, K. J. Physiol. 2005, 562,
27; (f) Vullo, D.; Voipio, J.; Innocenti, A.; Rivera, C.; Ranki, H.; Scozzafava, A.;
Kaila, K.; Supuran, C. T.; Bioorg, C. T. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 971; (g) Lyons, K.
E.; Pahwa, R.; Comella, C. L.; Eisa, M. S.; Elble, R. J.; Fahn, S.; Jankovic, J.; Juncos,
J. L.; Koller, W. C.; Ondo, W. G.; Sethi, K. D.; Stern, M. B.; Tanner, C. M.; Tintner,
R.; Watts, R. L. Drug Saf. 2003, 26, 461; (h) Garske, L. A.; Brown, M. G.; Morrison,
S. C. J. Appl. Physiol. 2003, 94, 991; (i) Hori, K.; Ishida, S.; Inoue, M.; Shinoda, K.;
Kawashima, S.; Kitamura, S.; Oguchi, Y. Retina 2004, 24, 481; (j) Winum, J. Y.;
Scozzafava, A.; Montero, J. L.; Supuran, C. T. Med. Res. Rev. 2005, 25, 186; (k)
Supuran, C. T. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents 2003, 13, 1545.
4. (a) Supuran, C. T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 3467; (b) Neri, D.; Supuran,
C. T. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discovery 2011, 10, 767.
0
CH2, H2’), 2.94 (t, CH2, J = 7.0 Hz, H1 ), 5.91 (tt, CHF2, J = 56.5 Hz,
0
J = 4.5 Hz, H3 ), 6.71 (d, 2CH, J = 8.7 Hz, H3 and H5), 7.53 (d, 2CH,
J = 8.7 Hz, H2 and H6). 13C NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz, ppm) d: 35.3
0
0
(t, CH2, J = 22 Hz, C2 ), 37.8 (t, CH2, J = 7 Hz, C1 ), 114.5 (2CH, C3
0
and C5), 117.3 (t, CHF2, J = 237 Hz, C3 ), 126.8 (C1), 129.9 (2CH, C2
and C6), 154.0 (C4). 19F{1H} NMR (CD3OD, 376 MHz, ppm) d:
ꢀ119.02. MS (IES+, ACN): m/z 273 [M+Na]+. HRMS (ESI, CH3OH):
m/z 273.0484 (m/z theoretical: 273.04853) [M+Na]+.
4.1.16. Formation of compounds 21: 4-amino-N-bis(2-chloro
allyl)benzenesulfonamide
To a solution 172 mg of sulfanilamide (1.0 mmol) and 304 mg of
K2CO3 in 2.5 mL of DMF was added dropwise 0.2 mL of 1,2-dichlo-
ropropane (2.1 mmol). The mixture was heating at room tempera-
ture for 6 days. Then, 25 mL of water was added and the solution
was extracted with ethylacetate (ꢁ3). The combined organic
phases were dried (MgSO4) and concentrated in vacuo. The crude
mixture was purified by column chromatography with the eluent
petroleum ether/ethylacetate: 70/30, thereby obtaining compound
21 (498 mg, 62%). 1H NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz, ppm) d: 4.01 (s,
5. Thiry, A.; Supuran, C. T.; Masereel, B.; Dogné, J.-M. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51,
3051.
6. Supuran, C. T. Carbonic Anhydrase, Its Inhibitors and Activators; CRC Press:
London, 2004. pp. 67–147.
7. Alterio, V.; Di Fiore, A.; D’Ambrosio, K.; Supuran, C. T.; De Simone, G. In Drug
Design of Zinc-Enzyme Inhibitors Functional, Structural, and Disease Applications;
Supuran, C. T., Winum, J. Y., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken (NJ), 2009; p 73.
8. (a) Rami, M.; Maresca, A.; Smaine, F.-Z.; Montero, J.-L.; Scozzafava, A.; Winum,
J.-Y.; Supuran, C. T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 2975; (b) Capkauskaite, E.;
Baranauskiene, L.; Golovenko, D.; Manakova, E.; Grazulis, S.; Tumkevicius, S.;
Matulis, D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 7357; (c) Mader, P.; Brynda, J.; Gitto, R.;
Agnello, S.; Pachl, P.; Supuran, C. T.; Chimiri, A.; Rezacova, P. J. Med. Chem. 2011,
54, 2522; (d) Mincione, F.; Benedini, F.; Biondi, S.; Cecchi, A.; Temperini, C.;
Formicola, G.; Pacileo, I.; Scozzafava, A.; Masini, E.; Supuran, C. T. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 3216; (e) Bertucci, A.; Innocenti, A.; Scozzafava, A.;
Tambutté, S.; Zoccola, D.; Supuran, C. T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 710.
9. Di Fiore, A.; Maresca, V.; Alterio, C. T.; De Supuran, G.; De Simone Chem.
Commun. 2011, 47, 11636.
0
0
0
2CH2, C1 ), 5.34 (d, 2H, J = 1.5 Hz, C3 ), 5.44 (d, 2H, J = 1.2 Hz, C3 ),
6.69 (d, 2CH, J = 8.7 Hz, C3 and C5), 7.52 (d, 2CH, J = 8.8 Hz, C2 and
137
0
C6).
C NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz, ppm) d: 54.3 (2CH2, C1 ), 114.3
0
(2CH, C3 and C5), 116.4 (2CH2, C3 ), 126.5 (C1), 130.6 (2CH, C2 and
0
C6), 138.2 (C2 ), 154.7 (C4). MS (IES+, ACN): m/z 343 and 345
[M+Na]+. HRMS (ESI, CH3OH): m/z 343.0050 (m/z theoretical:
343.00507) [M+Na]+.
10. Hen, N.; Bialer, M.; Yagen, B.; Maresca, A.; Aggarwal, M.; Robbins, A. H.;
McKenna, R.; Scozzafava, A.; Supuran, C. T. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54,
3977.
4.2. CA Inhibition
11. (a) Vullo, D.; Franchi, M.; Gallori, E.; Pastorek, J.; Scozzafava, A.; Pastorekova, S.;
Supuran, C. T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 1005; (b) Carta, F.; Garaj, V.;
Maresca, A.; Wagner, J.; Avvaru, B. S.; Robbins, A. H.; Scozzafava, A.; McKenna,
R.; Supuran, C. T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011, 19, 3105. and references cited
therein; (c) Alp, C.; Maresca, A.; Alp, N. A.; Gultekin, M. S.; Ekinci, D.;
12. Maresca, A.; Temperini, C.; Vu, H.; Pham, N. B.; Poulsen, S.-A.; Scozzafava, A.;
Quinn, R. J.; Supuran, C. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3057.
13. Vullo, D.; Scozzafava, A.; Pastorekova, S.; Pastorek, J.; Supuran, C. T. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 2351.
14. S. Biswas, M. Aggarwal, Ö., Güzel, A. Scozzafava, R. McKenna, C. T. Supuran,
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011, 19, 3732-3738.
15. Saada, M.-C.; Vullo, D.; Montero, L.-L.; Scozzafava, A.; Winum, J.-Y.; Supuran, C.
T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 4884.
16. (a) K. L. Kirk J. Fluorine. Chem. 2006, 127, 1013-1029. (b) J-P. Bégué, D. Bonnet-
Delpon, J. Fluorine. Chem. 2006, 127, 992-1012. (c) S. Purser, P. R. Moore, S.
Swallow, V. Gouverneur, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 320-330.
An Applied Photophysics stopped-flow instrument has been
used for assaying the CA catalysed CO2 hydration activity.32 Phenol
red (at a concentration of 0.2 mM) has been used as indicator,
working at the absorbance maximum of 557 nm, with 20 mM
Hepes (pH 7.5) as buffer, and 20 mM Na2SO4 for maintaining con-
stant the ionic strength, following the initial rates of the CA-cata-
lyzed CO2 hydration reaction for a period of 10–100 s. The CO2
concentrations ranged from 1.7 to 17 mM for the determination
of the kinetic parameters and inhibition constants. For each inhib-
itor at least six traces of the initial 5–10% of the reaction have been
used for determining the initial velocity. The uncatalyzed rates
were determined in the same manner and subtracted from the to-
tal observed rates. Stock solutions of inhibitor (10 mM) were pre-
pared in distilled-deionized water and dilutions up to 0.01 nM
were done thereafter with the assay buffer. Inhibitor and enzyme
solutions were preincubated together for 15 min at room temper-
ature prior to assay, in order to allow for the formation of the E–I
complex. The inhibition constants were obtained by non-linear
least-squares methods using PRISM 3, whereas the kinetic param-
eters for the uninhibited enzymes from Lineweaver–Burk plots, as
reported earlier,8–10 and represent the mean from at least three dif-
ferent determinations. The four CA isoforms were recombinant
ones, obtained in-house as reported earlier.8–10
17. O’Hagan, D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 308.
18. (a) Morgenthaler, M.; Schweiser, E.; Hoffman-Roder, F.; Benini, F.; Martin, R. E.;
Jaeschke, G.; Wagner, B.; Fisher, H.; Bendels, S.; Zimmerili, D.; Schneider, J.;
Hiedrich, F.; Kansy, M.; Muller, K. Chem. Med. Chem. 2007, 2, 1100; (b)
Hagmann, W. H. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 4359.
19. For recent examples please see: (a) Yamamoto, I.; Deniau, G. P.; Gavande, N.;
Chebib, M.; Johnston, G. A. R.; O’Hagan, D. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 7956; (b)
Yamamoto, I.; Jordan, M. J.; Gavande, N.; Doddareddy, M. R.; Chebib, M.;
Hunter, L. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 829.
20. Scozzafava, A.; Menabuoni, L.; Mincione, F.; Briganti, F.; Mincione, G.; Supuran,
C. T. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4542.
21. Olah, G. A.; Prakash, G. K. S.; Molnar, A.; Sommer, J. Superacids, 2nd ed.; WILEY:
New-York, 2009.