ChemComm
Communication
crystallization), along with a lower LUMO, exhibited the most
desirable film morphology and semiconductive capacity.
In conclusion, a new synthetic protocol was developed for
preparing triphenyleno[1,2,3,4-ghi]perylenediimide derivatives,
involving a sequence of ICl-induced cyclization, dehalogenation,
and photocyclization reactions. Using this method, PAH 3 featuring
a benzo[k]tetraphene moiety fused with two benzoperylenediimides
was prepared from terphenyl bisethynylene PDI dimer 1. The
electron-deficient characteristics of these PDI derivatives, in combi-
nation with the optimal film-forming ability, entailed desirable
electron-transporting performance in solution-processed OFET
devices. Electron mobilities up to 0.079 and 0.014 cm2 VÀ1 sÀ1
were achieved for 1 and 3, respectively. The work presented herein
has offered both new structures and potent synthetic tools for
developing large, electron-deficient PAH-based electron-transport-
ing semiconductors.
Fig. 2 The transfer (a, VSD = 100 V) and output characteristics (b) of 1 (red) and
3 (blue), measured from OFET devices (L = 5 mm, W = 100 mm) fabricated with
CYTOP on the top (capacitance Ci = 3.7 nF cmÀ2).
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (no. 21174004, 51073002, and 21222403).
Au(source/drain electrodes)/SiO2/Si substrates in the glove box. After
thermal annealing the obtained organic films at 160 1C for about
10 min, a poly(perfluorobutenylvinylether) CYTOP solution was spin-
coated on top of the organic films to serve as the dielectric layer
(ca. 500 nm thick). Then an aluminum layer was thermally evapo-
rated to act as the gate electrode. All devices were tested under
ambient conditions. The highest electron mobility detected for
molecule 1 reached 0.079 cm2 VÀ1 sÀ1 (Fig. 2). Compound 3
Notes and references
1 (a) C. Wang, H. Dong, W. Hu, Y. Liu and D. Zhu, Chem. Rev., 2012,
112, 2208; (b) Y. Wen, Y. Liu, Y. Guo, G. Yu and W. Hu, Chem. Rev.,
2011, 111, 3358; (c) A. C. Arias, J. D. Mackenzie, L. McCulloch,
J. Rivnay and A. Salleo, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 3.
2 (a) J. S. Ha, K. H. Kim and D. H. Choi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011,
133, 10364; (b) T. Lei, J.-H. Dou, Z.-J. Ma, C.-H. Yao, C.-J. Liu,
J.-Y. Wang and J. Pei, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 20025.
3 (a) J. Zaumseil and H. Sirringhaus, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 1296;
(b) J. Li, F. Qin, C. M. Li, Q. Bao, M. B. Chan-Park, W. Zhang, J. Qin
and B. S. Ong, Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 2057; (c) Y. Wang, E. Zhou,
Y. Liu, H. Xi, S. Ye, W. Wu, Y. Guo, C. Di, Y. Sun, G. Yu and Y. Li,
Chem. Mater., 2007, 19, 3361.
4 X. Zhan, A. Facchetti, S. Barlow, T. J. Marks, M. A. Ratner,
M. R. Wasielewski and S. R. Marder, Adv. Mater., 2011, 23, 268.
5 C. L. Eversloh, C. Li and K. Mu¨llen, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 4148.
6 Z. Yuan, Y. Xiao and X. Qian, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 2772.
7 H. Qian, F. Negri, C. Wang and Z. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008,
130, 17970.
8 Q. Yue, J. Chang, K.-W. Huang and C. Chi, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 5960.
9 W. Yue, A. Lv, J. Gao, W. Jiang, L. Hao, C. Li, Y. Li, L. E. Polander,
S. Barlow, W. Hu, S. D. Motta, F. Negri, S. R. Marder and Z. Wang,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 5770.
exhibited an electron mobility of 0.014 cm2 VÀ1 À1, whereas 2a
s
possessed a much lower electron mobility of 5.7 Â 10À4 cm2 VÀ1 sÀ1
.
Subsequently, thin-film morphologies of 1–3 were characterized.
The film preparation conditions were identical to those applied for
OFET fabrication. The AFM images confirmed the amorphous
nature of all three examined materials, as no obvious crystalline
domains were observed (Fig. 3). However, disparate smoothness
was observed for different films, which well correlated with their
respective semiconductive performance. Specifically, molecules 1
and 3 both manifested relatively smooth surfaces with minimum
roughness, but the homogeneity of the former was still superior to
that of the latter. In contrast, an evidently more bumpy and rough
surface was displayed by molecule 2a, explaining its less optimal
transistor performance.
10 Q. Yan and D. Zhao, Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 3426.
11 (a) M. B. Goldfinger and T. M. Swager, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994,
116, 7895; (b) M. B. Goldfinger, K. B. Crawford and T. M. Swager,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 4578.
12 (a) T. Yao, M. A. Campo and R. C. Larock, Org. Lett., 2004, 6, 2677;
(b) T. Yao, M. A. Campo and R. C. Larock, J. Org. Chem., 2005,
70, 3511.
13 Q. Yan, K. Cai, C. Zhang and D. Zhao, Org. Lett., 2012, 14, 4654.
14 J. Wu, L. Gherghel, M. D. Waston, J. Li, Z. Wang, C. D. Simpson,
U. Kolb and K. Mu¨llen, Macromolecules, 2003, 36, 7082.
15 (a) H. Chen, J. Yin, Y. Wang and J. Pei, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 3113;
(b) T. Chen and R. Liu, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 4644.
16 A. Mukherjee, K. Pati and R.-S. Liu, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 6311.
17 C.-W. Li, C.-I. Wang, H.-Y. Liao, R. Chaudhuri and R.-S. Liu, J. Org.
Chem., 2007, 72, 9203.
While all three molecules exhibited sufficient solubility allowing
for solution processing of OFETs, the differences in molecular
structure and film morphology were evident. The significant steric
encumbrance in 2 apparently hindered effective intermolecular
stacking of the molecule. Although compound 3 possessed a larger
PAH skeleton, the non-planar conformation likely curtailed its
ability to form long-range ordered structures. Compound 1, posses-
sing properly balanced structural rigidity (pivotal for p-conjugation
and molecular stacking) and flexibility (hampering large-scale
18 Y. Shi, H. Qian, Y. Li, W. Yue and Z. Wang, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 2337.
19 H. Qian, Z. Wang, W. Yue and D. Zhu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007,
129, 10664.
20 (a) J. Muzart, Tetrahedron, 2009, 65, 8313; (b) A. M. Zawisza and
J. Muzart, Tetrahedron Lett., 2007, 48, 6738; (c) A. M. Zawiska,
B. Ganchegue, I. Gonzaley, S. Bouquillon, A. Roglans, F. Henin
and J. Muzart, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2008, 283, 140; (d) M. S. Driver and
J. F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 7217; (e) N. Kataoka,
Q. Shelby, J. P. Stambuli and J. F. Hartwig, J. Org. Chem., 2002,
67, 5553.
Fig. 3 AFM height images (1 mm  1 mm) of thin films of compounds 1–3 after
thermal annealing at 160 1C: (a) 1, (b) 2a, (c) 3.
21 U. Rohr, C. Kohl, K. Mu¨llen, A. van de Craats and J. Warman,
J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 11, 1789.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Chem. Commun.