G Model
CCLET-2481; No. of Pages 3
Y. Nie et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters xxx (2013) xxx–xxx
3
Table 1
In vitro antibacterial activity of C10,11-epoxide acylide derivatives.
Organism
MIC (mg/mL)
14d
14f
128
14i
64
14j
128
Azithromycin
Clarithromycin
Erythromycin
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Staphylococcus aureus MRSA
Staphylococcus epidermidis MRSE
Escherichia coli
32
64
0.25
0.03125
128
4
4
>128
2
128
128
128
128
64
64
64
64
64
128
128
64
32
64
64
32
16
32
128
128
128
>128
>128
4
>128
128
64
2
32
>128
128
128
16
Salmonella typhi
128
128
>128
>128
>128
2
16
Klebsiella pneumonia
128
64
>128
64
2
32
Hemophilus influenzae
Escherichia coli ESBL
0.03125
1
128
>128
>128
>128
32
8
>128
>128
>128
>128
Klebsiella pneumonia ESBL
[4] J.C. Pechere, Macrolide resistance mechanisms in Gram-positive cocci, Int. J.
Antimicrob. Agents 18 (2001) S25–S28.
[5] T. Tanikawa, T. Asaka, M. Kashimura, et al., Synthesis and antibacterial activity of a
novel series of acylides: 3-O-(3-pyridyl) acetylerythromycin A derivatives, J. Med.
Chem. 46 (2003) 2706–2715.
target compounds 14a–j. The structures of the target compounds
synthesized herein were fully confirmed by melting points,
1HNMR, IR, ESI-MS, and elemental analysis [8].
[6] T. Ly, S. Yat, M. Zhenkun, 6-O-alkyl-2-nor-2-substituted ketolide derivatives, U.S.
Patent. 0103140 (2002).
3. Results and discussion
[7] A.K. Ghosh, K. Jae-Hun, An enantioselective synthesis of the C1 C9 segment of
antitumor macrolide peloruside A, Tetrahedron Lett. 44 (2003) 3967–3969.
[8] Selected characteristic data for the compounds. 9: Yellow powder; mp 91–93 8C, IR
(KBr, cmꢀ1): y 1706, 1729, 1748; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 7.28–7.40 (m, 5H,
Ph-H), 5.03 (dd, 1 H, J = 2.3 Hz and 9.2 Hz, H13), 4.69 (dd, 1 H, J = 2.3 Hz and 8.2 Hz,
The 10,11-epoxy acylide erythromycin derivatives and the
reference compounds, clarithromycin and azithromycin were tested
against different representative pathogens. Various pathogens were
tested in order to identify the potency of these acylide analogs.
The in vitro antibacterial activity is reported as minimum
inhibitory concentrations (MICs). As shown in Table 1, most of
these compounds are as effective as erythromycin to the Gram-
positive bacteria. Meanwhile, several compounds displayed
improved activity to Gram-negative bacteria. To readily interpret
the structure–activity relationships of the C-3 position substituent,
the C6-carbamoyl side chain was initially held constant, while
various C3-carbamates were examined. Basic groups were intro-
duced in these C3-carbamate derivatives to increase their water
solubility. However, attempts to improve activity by structural
modification of acylides with aryl-piperzine sidechains shortening
or lengthening the pyridylalkyl chain, as in compounds aryl-
piperzine sidechain had a detrimental effect against either Gram-
positive bacteria or Gram-negative bacteria compared to clari-
thronycin, telithromycin, and azithromycin.
0
0
H
2 ), 3.10 (s, 3H, C6-OCH3), 1.88 (s, 3H, C2 -OCOCH3), 1.66 (s, 3H, C10-CH3); ESI-MS
m/z (%): 772 (M+Na+). X-ray analysis: C39H59NO13
,
Mr = 749.90, crystal size
0.586 mm ꢁ 0.173 mm ꢁ 0.049 mm, orthorhombic in p21/n with a = 14.024(3),
3
˚
˚
b = 28.998(6), c = 10.915(2) A, a, b, g = 908, V = 3185.0(9) A , Dcalu = 1.151
Mg/m3, and Z = 4, absorption coefficient 0.087 mmꢀ1, computing structure solu-
tion SHELXL-97, theta range for data collection 1.61 to 25.508, limiting indices
ꢀ16 ꢂ h ꢂ 10, ꢀ35 ꢂ k ꢂ 19, ꢀ13 ꢂ l ꢂ 12, reflection collected 23690, refinement
method full-matrix least-squares, final R indices [I > 2 sigma (I)] R1 = 0.1016,
wR2 = 0.2461, R indices (all data) R1 = 0.2601, wR2 = 0.3102, goodness-of-fit on
F2 0.894, largest difference peak 0.360 eA , largest difference hole ꢀ0.236 eA
ꢀ3
ꢀ3
.
˚
˚
14a: White crystal; mp 127–129 8C, IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): y 1165, 1706, 1741; 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): d 7.09–7.28 (m, 5H, Ph-H), 5.01 (dd, 1 H, J = 2.4 Hz and 10.4 Hz,
H13), 3.23 (s, 3H, C6-OCH3), 3.18 (m, 4H, 2ꢁCH2 in piperazinyl), 2.65 (m, 6H, 2ꢁCH2
in piperazinyl and CH2N), 2.39 (s, 6H, N(CH3)2), 1.64 (s, 3H, C10-OCH3); ESI-MS m/z
(%): 803 (M+H+). 14b: White crystal; mp 117–119 8C, IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): y 1164, 1512,
1741; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 6.81–7.27 (m, 4H, Ph-H), 5.01 (dd, 1 H, J = 2.3 Hz
and 10.3 Hz, H13), 3.76 (s, 3H, Ar-OCH3), 3.12 (s, 3H, C6-OCH3), 3.07 (m, 4H, 2ꢁCH2
in piperazinyl), 2.68 (m, 6H, 2ꢁCH2 in piperazinyl and CH2N), 2.46 (s, 6H, N(CH3)2),
1.62 (s, 3H, C10-CH3); ESI-MS m/z (%): 833 (M+H+). 14c: White crystal; mp 105-
106 8C, IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): y 1164, 1741; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 6.81–7.27 (m,
4H, Ph-H), 5.01 (dd, 1 H, J = 2.7 Hz and 10.5 Hz, H13), 3.22 (s, 3H, C6-OCH3), 3.15 (m,
4H, 2ꢁCH2 in piperazinyl), 2.63 (m, 6H, 2ꢁCH2 in piperazinyl and CH2N), 2.38 (s,
6H, N(CH3)2), 2.17 (s, 3H, Ar-CH3), 1.65 (s, 3H, C10-OCH3); ESI-MS m/z (%): 817
(M+H+). 14d: White crystal; mp 112–113 8C, IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): y 1164, 1742; 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): d 7.03–7.37 (m, 4H, Ph-H), 5.01 (dd, 1 H, J = 6.5 Hz and 14.0 Hz,
4. Conclusion
H
13), 3.24 (s, 3H, C6-OCH3), 3.11 (m, 4H, 2ꢁCH2 in piperazinyl), 2.66 (m, 6H, 2ꢁCH2
In summary, we have discovered a novel series of acylide
antibiotics that employ a C-3 carbamate for attachment of the
arylpiperzine sidechain with 10,11-epoxy moiety. Meanwhile, we
synthesized a unique 10,11-epoxy acylide skeleton structure, and
verified its spatial configuration through X-ray crystallography.
Compounds with various carbamate groups at the C-3 position
were studied for their antibacterial activity. Part of these
compounds showed improved activity against Gram-negative
bacteria compared with erythromycin and clathromycin.
in piperazinyl and CH2N), 2.40 (s, 6H, N(CH3)2), 1.65 (s, 3H, C10-OCH3); ESI-MS m/z
(%): 871 (M+H+). 14e: White crystal; mp 114–116 8C, IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): y 1164, 1742;
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 6.90–7.45 (m, 4H, Ph-H), 5.00 (dd, 1 H, J = 2.4 Hz and
10.3 Hz, H13), 3.23 (s, 3H, C6-OCH3), 3.14 (m, 4H, 2ꢁCH2 in piperazinyl), 2.82 (m,
6H, 2ꢁCH2 in piperazinyl and CH2N), 2.29 (s, 6H, N(CH3)2), 1.64 (s, 3H, C10-OCH3);
ESI-MS m/z (%): 821 (M+H+). 14f: White crystal; mp 124–125 8C, IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): y
1163, 1742; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 6.95–7.18 (m, 4H, Ph-H), 5.00 (dd, 1 H,
J = 2.2 Hz and 10.2 Hz, H13), 3.24 (s, 3H, C6-OCH3), 3.19 (m, 4H, 2ꢁCH2 in piper-
azinyl), 2.83 (m, 6H, 2ꢁCH2 in piperazinyl and CH2N), 2.29 (s, 9H, Ph-CH3 and
N(CH3)2), 1.63 (s, 3H, C10-OCH3); ESI-MS m/z (%): 817 (M+H+). 14g: White crystal;
mp 134–136 8C, IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): y 1164, 1741; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 6.87–
7.02 (m, 4H, Ph-H), 5.00 (dd, 1 H, J = 2.7 Hz and 10.1 Hz, H13), 3.86 (s, 3H, Ph-OCH3),
3.23 (s, 3H, C6-OCH3), 3.15 (m, 4H, 2ꢁCH2 in piperazinyl), 2.69 (m, 6H, 2ꢁCH2 in
piperazinyl and CH2N), 2.31 (s, 6H, N(CH3)2), 1.64 (s, 3H, C10-OCH3); ESI-MS m/z
(%): 833 (M+H+). 14h: White crystal; mp 99–107 8C, IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): y 1165, 1741;
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 8.18 (d, 1 H, Pyr-H6), 7.47 (t, 1 H, Pyr-H4), 6.63 (t, 2H,
Pyr-H3, Pyr-H5), 5.00 (dd, 1 H, J = 3.7 Hz and 8.9 Hz, H13), 3.22 (s, 3H, C6-OCH3),
3.18 (m, 4H, 4H, 2ꢁCH2 in piperazinyl), 2.61 (m, 6H, 2ꢁCH2 in piperazinyl and
CH2N), 2.41 (s, 6H, N(CH3)2), 1.65 (s, 3H, C10-OCH3); ESI-MS m/z (%): 842 (M+H+).
14i: White crystal; mp 100–102 8C, IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): y 1164, 1742; 1H NMR
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceutical
Company. The X-ray crystallography was performed at Shanghai
Institute of Organic Chemistry, China Academy of Science.
References
(300 MHz, CDCl3): d 6.90–6.99 (m, 3H, Ph-H), 5.00 (dd,
1 H, J = 2.7 Hz and
10.1 Hz, H13), 3.23 (s, 3H, C6-OCH3), 3.11 (m, 4H, 2ꢁCH2 in piperazinyl), 2.66
(m, 6H, 2ꢁCH2 in piperazinyl and CH2N), 2.26 (s, 6H, N(CH3)2), 2.25 (s, 3H, Ph-CH3),
2.22 (s, 3H, Ph-CH3), 1.65 (s, 3H, C10-OCH3); ESI-MS m/z (%): 832 (M+H+). 14j:
White crystal; mp 114–115 8C, IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): y 1165, 1741; 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3): d 6.80–7.07 (m, 3H, Ph-H), 5.00 (dd, 1 H, J = 2.7 Hz and 10.1 Hz, H13), 3.22 (s,
3H, C6-OCH3), 3.14 (m, 4H, 2ꢁCH2 in piperazinyl), 2.65 (m, 6H, 2ꢁCH2 in piper-
azinyl and CH2N), 2.31 (s, 6H, N(CH3)2), 2.24 (s, 3H, Ph-CH3), 2.21 (s, 3H, Ph-CH3),
1.65 (s, 3H, C10-OCH3); ESI-MS m/z (%): 832 (M+H+).
[1] P. Kurath, P. Jones, R. Egan, et al., Acid degradation of erythromycin A and
erythromycin B, Experentia 27 (1971) 362.
[2] K. Krowick, A. Zamojski, Chemical modification of erythromycin I. 8,9-anhydro-69-
hemiketal of A, J. Antibiot. 26 (1973) 569–574.
[3] R. Leclercq, Mechanisms of resistance to macrolides and lincosamides: nature of
the resistance elements and their clinical implications, Clin. Infect. Dis. 34 (2002)
482–492.
Please cite this article in press as: Y. Nie, et al., Synthesis and antibacterial activity of novel 10,11-epoxy acylide erythromycin