T. Arnauld et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23 (2013) 2217–2219
2219
OH
NH
HO
HO
HO
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Br
O
H2O
+
N
+
N
P450
+
N
HN
Br
Br
Br
Br
10
LNAChR
-H2O
-H2O
OH
HO
Br
O
+
N
Br
NH
O
3
11
Scheme 5. Pyridinium rearrangement.
‘Kost–Sagitullin rearrangement’ were later applied to pyrimidines
and reported in a review by Danagulyan.7
OH
OH
O
a
b
c
As a final proof of structure for metabolite 11, a synthesis work
was undertaken as shown in Scheme 6. 4-Hydroxyaniline was N-
Boc protected and then N- and O-methylated. Boc-oriented
lithiation of the ring allowed a nucleophilic attack on methyl
p-bromobenzoate, yielding benzophenone 15, which could be
O-methyl and N-Boc deprotected in one step using concentrated
HBr under microwave irradiation.
NH
NH2
N
BOC
BOC
OH
13
12
14
O
Br
Br
d
As expected, spectral and LC data were found to fit perfectly
those from the metabolite detected in the urine samples and from
the desulfated metabolisation product of the bioconversion.
In conclusion, two major metabolites of nicotinic ligand of acet-
ylcholinergic receptors LNAChR were synthesized using conven-
tional organic chemistry and biotransformation with filamentous
fungus Aspergillus alliaceus. Of these two metabolites, one was
shown to be the product of a very uncommon rearrangement from
pyridinium to aniline, the first example of a biologically driven
‘Kost–Sagitullin rearrangement’.
NH
O
N
O
11
BOC
15
Scheme 6. Reagents and conditions: (a) (Boc)2O, DMF, rt; (b) NaH, CF3SO3Me, ether,
rt; (c) t-BuLi, p-Br(C6H4)CO2Me, ether, À78 °C; (d) HBr, W.
l
An upscaled reaction with Aspergillus alliaceus was therefore
undertaken and yielded, as expected, a mixture of the 5-hydroxyl-
ated metabolite (3), p-bromobenzoic acid (1) and the unknown sul-
fated species, which after preparative HPLC neatly decomposed by
losing spontaneously sulfur trioxide SO3.
This new species was eventually identified as benzophenone 11
and possessed all the analytical features of ‘Metabolite X’ (Mass,
NMR, Retention Time).
It is noteworthy that opening of a pyridinium ring by hydrolysis
of the cyclic Schiff base like C@N double bond has been postulated
a few number of times in the literature.4 In our case, this is cer-
tainly the key step in the mechanistic hypothesis, in which the
rearrangement would occur after oxidation by cytochrome P450
(Scheme 5).5 The epoxide intermediate will hydrolyze, leading to
the diol, then to the aldehyde with concomitant opening of the
pyridinium ring. The aldehyde functionality is then free to undergo
cyclization by internal Knoevenagel reaction with the methylene in
Acknowledgment
The authors wish to thank Xavier Poisson for helpful discussion
on metabolisation pathways.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
a
-position to the ketone to yield 11 as ‘Metabolite X’.
It is our hypothesis that sulfatation occurred at the final stage of
1. Meth-Cohn, O.; Yu, C.-Y.; Lestage, P.; Lebrun, M.-C.; Caignard, D.-H.; Renard, P.
EP 1050531.
this mechanism, but we have no indication whatsoever that this
has not occurred anywhere else in the process. The fact that com-
pounds 3 and 11 are the main metabolites in animal species and in
biotransformation by Aspergillus alliaceus stress on the hypothesis
that these two compounds are produced from the same intermedi-
ate which could be the diol 10. Spectral data (1H NMR and Mass
spectrometry) and LC retention time for 11 are in complete agree-
ment with the ones observed for the original metabolite detected
in the urine and faeces samples.
Examples of such rearrangement in the literature from a pyrid-
inium salt to an aniline are scarce and to the best of our knowledge
have been exclusively reported by Sagitullin et al. under conven-
tional chemistry conditions.6 Some examples of the now-called
2. Hogg, R. C.; Raggenbass, M.; Bertrand, D. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2003,
147, 1.
3. Proton sets for pyridinium and aniline moieties (1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) d
ppm): (2) 8.65 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (dd, J = 7.2 Hz,
2.8 Hz, 1H) (3) 8.62 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.97 (dd, J = 8.8 Hz, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.85 (d,
J = 8.8 Hz, 1H). (11) 7.01 (dd, J = 9.0 Hz, 2.9 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H), 6.71
(d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H)
4. van der Plas, H. C. Tetrahedron 1985, 4, 237.
5. (a) Balogh, G. T.; Keserü, G. M. Arkivoc 2004, 7, 124; (b) Higuchi, T.; Hirobe, M. J.
Mol. Catal. 1996, 113, 403.
6. (a) Shkil, G. P.; Lusis, V.; Muceniece, D.; Sagitullin, R. S. Tetrahedron 1995, 51,
8599; (b) Shkil, G. P.; Sagitullin, R. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 2075. and
references cited therein.
7. Danagulyan, G. G. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 2005, 41, 1205.