yield of 32% as a single diastereomer. Compound 15 was
the only isomer, among many conceivable ones, that could
be isolated under these conditions.11 Its structure was
verified by X-ray crystallography which also confirmed
its absolute configuration by virtue of the heavy silicon
atom (Figure 1). It is noteworthy that employing the
diastereomeric vinyl iodide anti-7, as well variants of the
vinyl iodide 7 with the alcohol unprotected, yielded no
isolable DielsÀAlder products under the same conditions
and only complex mixtures that contained isomeric
bicyclo[4.2.0]octadienes were obtained.
Unfortunately, despite extensive efforts,12 dehydration of
alcohol 18 by syn-elimination or E1-elimination was also
problematic and could never be effected in synthetically
useful yields.
Scheme 4. Derivitization of the Tricyclic Core and Successful
Inversion of the Alcohol Functionality
Figure 1. X-ray structure of tricyclic ester 15.
With the tricyclic diene 15 now in hand, we were faced
with the challenge of converting it to the corresponding
triene in order to complete the core structure of (À)-PF-
1018 (1). We anticipated that removing the ester function-
ality would improve thermal stability toward homolytic or
heterolytic bond cleavageof the carbon skeleton, and diene
15 was first desilylated and then reduced to give diol 16
(Scheme 4). After selective protection of the primary
alcohol moiety, it was possible to obtain hindered ketone
17 via oxidation with DMP. However, further transforma-
tion into the corresponding enol triflate or hydrazone, as
well as epimerization of the R-methyl group using base,
proved unsuccessful, even under forcing conditions.
We reasoned that the hindered, neopentylic alcohol 18
may possess an unfavorable geometry for the requisite
stereoelectronics of a syn-elimination, prompting us to
investigate methods for its stereochemical inversion. Re-
duction of ketone 17proceeded smoothly under Birch-type
conditions (Li, NH3/THF, À78 °C) but was completely
unselective, yielding a 1:1 dr. By contrast, conversion of
alcohol 18 into its chloromethyl sulfonate derivative 19,
followed by treatment with CsOAc at elevated tempera-
tures and prolonged reaction times,13 cleanly yielded the
inverted acetate 20. Solvolysis of acetate 20 delivered the
inverted alcohol 21, which was accompanied by a small
amount desilylation to give diol 22, the structure of which
was confirmed by X-ray crystallography (Figure 2). We
were encouraged by the axial orientation of the alcohol
evident from the crystal structure, the geometry of which
appears well-suited for anti-elimination. However, expo-
sure of alcohol 21 to an array of standard elimination
conditions has not yet successfully introduced the requisite
alkene for the core structure of (À)-PF-1018 (1). All
attempts to convert the secondary alcohol function in 21
into a leaving group led to its decomposition, presumably
via interference of the proximate, highly nucleophilic
alkene functionality.
(11) The majority of the remaining mass balance from the key
reaction cascade consisted of a nonpolar fraction containing a complex
mixture of inseparable products. The various components of this
intractable mixture likely originate from tetraene 6 via alkene isomer-
izations and/or alternate available pericyclic reaction modes. Despite
attempted purification, no additional products could be successfully
isolated or identified.
(12) Including, but not limited to, Burgess reagent: (a) Atkins, G. M.,
Jr.; Burgess, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 4744. (b) Burgess, E. M.;
Penton, H. R., Jr.; Taylor, E. A. J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 26. (c) Ishikawa,
H.; Elliott, G.; Velcicky, J.; Choi, Y.; Boger, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 10596. Martin’s sulfurane: (d) Arhart, R. J.; Martin, J. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 5003. (e) Martin, J. C.; Franz, J. A.; Arhart, R. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 4604. Chugaev elimination: (f) Tschugaeff,
L. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1900, 33, 3118. (g) Nace, H. R. Org. React.
2011, 57–100. Re2O7-mediated elimination: (h) Korstanje, T. J.;
de Waard, E. F.; Jastrzebski, J. T.; Klein Gebbink, R. J. M. ACS Catal.
2012, 2, 2173. Tf2O, 2,6-lutidine: (i) Tanino, K.; Onuki, K.; Asano, K.;
Miyashita, M.; Nakamura, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Kuwajima, I. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1498. POCl3, pyridine: (j) Birch, A. M.; Pattenden,
G. J. Chem Soc., Chem. Commun. 1980, 24, 1195. SOCl2, pyridine: (k)
Watanabe, H.; Takano, M.; Umino, A.; Ito, T.; Ishikawa, H.; Nakada,
M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 359. MsCl, Et3N: (l) Bonikowski, R.; Kula, J.;
Bujacz, A.; Wajs-Bonikowska, A.; Zakzos-Szyda, M.; Wysocki, S.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2012, 23, 1038. Mitsonobu-type elimination:
(m) Izuhara, T.; Katoh, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 7651.
(13) (a) Shimizu, T.; Hiranuma, S.; Nakata, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996,
37, 6145. (b) Shirahata, T.; Sunazuka, T.; Yoshida, K.; Yamamoto, D.;
Harigaya, Y.; Kuwajima, I.; Nagai, T.; Kiyohara, H.; Yamada, H.; Omura,
S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 62, 9483.
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX
C