phenol-ether (PMP) as a masked nucleophile, because the
oxidative conditions required to cleave the 4-methoxyphe-
nol ether are well tolerated by azides and the reducing
agents that transform an azide into the parent amine
generally leave the PMP group unscathed.
The synthesis of the 2,2-dimethyl-4-(4-methoxy-phenoxy)-
butanoate ester (MPDMB) precursors is straightforward.
Alkylation of ethyl isobutyrate with bromide 1,9 followed
by saponification, affords the crystalline acid 2 in good
yield (Scheme 1). This compound is converted to the
corresponding chloride 3 by treatment with a slight excess
of oxalyl chloride in DCM at reflux, and reagent 3 can be
used without purification.
demands protection of the required building blocks with
two distinct participating groups.13 We envisaged acces-
sing 7, a dimeric form of the S. mutans type e trisaccharide
repeating unit, employing MPDMB-functionalized build-
ing block 9 and AzDMB-functionalized 10 and 11, the
latter equipped with an O3-Levulinoyl ester to introduce
the branching and complete the set of orthogonalities.
With glucose building block 8 bearing an AzDMB group,
β-linked branching could be introduced selectively in a
multiple (2-fold) glycosylation fashion, and we projected
cleavage of the AzDMB esters concomitantly with the
benzyl-type protecting groups in the ultimate hydrogeno-
lysis event. Target 7 could be equipped with a suitably
protected amino-pentyl moiety 12 at the reducing end for
potential further elaboration.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the Protecting Group Precursors
Scheme 2. Target Identification and Retrosynthesis
The synthesis of the azido-functionalized counterpart
(2,2-dimethyl-4-azido butanoate, AzDMB) is performed
by reacting ethyl 2,2-dimethyl-4-chloro butanoate 410 with
sodium azide. Following saponification, the correspond-
ing acyl chloride 6 was generated with an excess of oxalyl
chloride in DCM at reflux, in analogy to acyl chloride 3.
We decided to engage the obtained pivaloate derivatives
in the assembly of an oligosaccharide, as the synthetic
operations and protecting group manipulations involved
represent an ideal setting to assess their properties. As an
exemplary target, we identified the (polymeric) backbone
of alternating (R1f2)- and (R1f3)-linked rhamnose units
that constitute the group-specific polysaccharide antigens
of Lancefield group A, C, and E streptococci, the serotype-
specific antigen of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus
sobrinus (Scheme 2).11 The capsular polysaccharide of
S. mutans12 features additional glucose residues on this
backbone located at the O2 of the (1f3)- linked rhamnose.
Inthecaseof S. mutans, serotypeetheglucosyl appendages
are β-linked. The generation of the pattern of alternating
1,2- and 1,3-trans rhamnosidic linkages in a linear fashion
The preparation of the monosaccharide building blocks
is depicted in Scheme 3. Thioglycosides 9 and 10 were ob-
tained by reacting the sodium alkoxide of rhamnose
thioglycoside 1314 with acyl chlorides 3 and 6, respectively,
in THF. The branching, central rhamnose unit 11 was
obtained by first protecting the equatorial hydroxyl group
of 14,14 by means of Bu2SnO-mediated regioselective
alkylation with PMBCl, followed by reaction of the axial
hydroxyl with 6, to furnish the AzDMB-ester. PMB-ether
cleavage was performed under acidic conditions (with
p-thiocresol as a cation scavenger)15 and was followed by
(9) Schultz, D. M.; Prescher, J. A.; Kidd, S.; Marona-Lewicka, D.;
Nichols, D. E.; Monte, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 6242.
(10) Kuwahara, M.; Kawano, Y.; Kajino, M.; Ashida, Y.; Miyake,
A. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1997, 45, 1447.
(11) Shibata, Y.; Yamashita, Y.; Ozaki, K.; Yoshio Nakano, Y.;
Koga, T. Infect. Immun. 2002, 70, 2891.
(12) Linzer, R.; Reddy, M. S.; Levin, M. J. In Molecular microbiology
and immunology of Streptococcus mutans; Hamada, S., Michalek, S. M.,
Kiyono, H., Menaker, L., McGhee, J. R., Eds.; Elsevier Science Publishers:
Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1986; pp 29À38.
(13) For convergent approaches towards related structures, see: (a)
Bedini, E.; Barone, G.; Unverzagt, C.; Parrilli, M. Carbohydr. Res. 2004,
€€
339, 393. (b) Hoog, C.; Rotondo, A.; Johnston, B. D.; Pinto, M.
Carbohydr. Res. 2002, 337, 2023. (c) Mulard, L. A.; Clement, M.-J.;
Imberty, A.; Delepierre, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 2486.
(14) Rajput, V. K.; Mukhopadhyay, B. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 6924.
(15) Using anisole as a scavenger led to isolation of the product in
lower yield (48%), due to the expulsion of the p-thiocresyl moiety from
the anomeric center. We excluded the use of DDQ. See: Crich, D.;
Vinogradova, O. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 3581.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 9, 2013
2271