Y. Qian et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23 (2013) 2936–2940
2937
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
N
R
H
N
OH
N
O
F
OH
O
O
F
O
F
F
OH
F
F
6
3
2
1
O
Figure 2. Design of 2-N-substituted indazolones as non-carboxylic acid GS
O
activators.
N
F
O
F
envisioned the synthesis of 6 through an intermolecular N-aryla-
tion reaction between N-Boc-N-alkylhydrazine or N-Boc-N-aryl-
hydrazine 7 and the ester of ortho-bromobenzoic acid 8 followed
by ring closure under acidic conditions as shown in Scheme 2 for
the preparation of 10ah through 10ok. While the intermolecular
N-arylation of N-arylhydrazine with aryl halide has been reported
using palladium acetate and tri-tert-butylphosphonium tetrafluo-
roborate,18 the synthetic method we describe here has not been re-
ported in the literature for the preparation of 2-N-substituted
indazolones. The required N-aryl-N-Boc-hydrazines 7d and 7e
were synthesized according to the literature method through the
N-arylation of N-Boc-hydrazine with an aryl iodide.19 The neces-
sary N-Boc-N-alkylhydrazine was prepared from an alkyl chloride
and hydrazine followed by protection of the secondary amine
rather than the primary amine.20 As described in Scheme 3 for
the preparation of 7c, 7f and 7g, we observed selective N-Boc for-
mation at the alkyl-substituted nitrogen of the hydrazine deriva-
tive 11. The preparation of aryl halides 8h through 8k is also
presented in Scheme 3. For the synthesis of 10mh (Table 2), 2,2-
diethoxyethylhydrazine was used and the aldehyde group in the
indazolone was reduced by sodium borohydride to provide the cor-
responding alcohol 10mh (reaction not shown in the scheme).21
As shown in Scheme 2, this synthetic sequence made it possible
to install different functional groups at the 2-N-position. Selected
reaction yields for step (a) and step (b) in Scheme 2 are listed in Ta-
ble 1. The N-arylation reaction gave decent yields despite the di-
ortho-substitution pattern. The deprotection of the Boc-group and
the subsequent cyclization was completed in one pot with aqueous
hydrochloric acid and THF. This method also made it possible for
one-pot deprotection of other acid-labile protective groups, such
as ester in 9ch and acetonide in 9fh, during the indazolone ring for-
mation step (10lh and 10nh).21 The relatively low yield for 10lh
was due to partial ester hydrolysis under these conditions.
Compounds 10ah through 10ok synthesized according to
Scheme 2 were studied for their activity as activators of human
muscle glycogen synthase (GYS1). The recombinant human muscle
GYS1 expressed and partially purified from sf9 cells was used as
the glycosyl transferase and the assay was carried out by coupling
with pyruvate kinase and lactate dehydrogenase.22 The more de-
tailed enzyme assay procedure is described in the Supplementary
data. The activation potencies are listed in Table 2.
Our earlier work on GS activators was primarily focused on car-
boxylic acids and acid mimetics.11–14,23 Although those compounds
demonstrated good potency in activating muscle glycogen syn-
thase, they have high protein binding and are mainly distributed
in liver when orally dosed in mice. Our rationale to identify non-
carboxylic acid GS activators was based on the assumption that
neutral compounds might have decreased protein binding and im-
proved muscle distribution relative to the liver. We designed the 2-
N-substituted indazolone series to improve the metabolic stability
of 5. As shown in Table 2, all compounds demonstrated GS activa-
O
OH
3
Figure 1. Structures of biphenyl ether derived carboxylic acids as GS activators.
mouse. Therefore, our goal was to identify non-carboxylic acid GS
activators with a potential of improved muscle distribution. In this
Letter, we report the first non-carboxylic acid GS activator from the
2-N-substituted-indazolone chemical class.
Since the major defect of glucose disposal in T2D is due to im-
paired glucose incorporation into glycogen in muscles (as shown
by the clamp study described in the introduction), compounds
with higher muscle exposure could achieve a higher on-target ef-
fect by increasing muscle GS activity. To identify non-carboxylic
acid GS activators to increase potential muscle exposure, we first
investigated derivatives of 3. Esterification of the carboxylic acid
to its corresponding ester abolished GS activation potency. When
the carboxylic acid was reduced to a hydroxyl group, significant
loss of potency was observed (EC50 = 4.1
75 M). Replacing the COOH group in 3 with an ethylenediol also
led to large reduction of potency (EC50 = 10.3 M, 6.6-fold increase
at 75 M). We next decided to replace the right hand phenylcarb-
oxamide fragment with heterocycles. One of the designed hetero-
cycles required an intermediate of ortho-aminobenzoic acid ester.
During the hydrogenation of intermediate 4 (reduction of the nitro
group in 4 to an amine, Scheme 1), benzisoxazolone 5 was isolated
as a side product, probably through partial reduction of the nitro
group to a hydroxylamine followed by cyclization. To our surprise,
this side product displayed good potency in GS activation
lM, 7.3-fold increase at
l
l
l
(EC50 = 1.0 lM, SC200 = 0.41 lM, 4.0-fold increase at 75 lM). How-
ever, when 5 was orally dosed to C57 mice, complete breakdown of
the bicyclic molecule into ortho-aminobenzoic acid was observed,
with the parent compound not detected in the plasma.
To resolve the metabolic stability problem in 5, we explored dif-
ferent bioisosteres to replace the benzisoxazolone. As shown in
Figure 2, a series of indazolones was designed and investigated
as non-carboxylic acid GS activators.
We initially investigated the application of Buchwald–Hartwig
palladium- and copper-catalyzed aromatic amination for the for-
mation of the C–N bond.15,16 Although it has been reported that
copper(I)-catalyzed intramolecular N-arylation of 2-halobenzhyd-
razide provided an efficient synthesis of 1-N-substituted indazol-
ones,17 a general and efficient method is still required for the
synthesis of 2-N-alkyl- and 2-N-aryl indazolones such as 6. We
O
O
H
NO2
F
F
N
H2, Pd/C
O
O
O
O
F
F
F
tion (2.5- to 6.8-fold increase at 75
tested). Results from the dose–response assay indicated a range
of EC50 (0.2–4 M) and SC200 (0.06–2.75 M) value. Compound
lM, the highest concentration
F
4
5
l
l
Scheme 1. Partial reduction of nitro group to form benzisoxazolone.