ChemComm
Communication
vulnerable planktonic bacteria can be cleared by conventional
antibiotics working in concert with host immune defences.2–4 It
is important to note that NO at the concentrations used are not
toxic to bacteria, but rather induce a genetically programmed
dispersion response. The current work has advanced the strategy
significantly towards clinical utility in describing a novel class of
drug-like biofilm-targeted NO-donor prodrugs (i.e., cephalos-
porin-30-diazeniumdiolates) that make use of the known ten-
dency of cephalosporins to eject leaving groups (in this case
diazeniumdiolate NO donors) from the 30-position via conjugate
elimination12 following b-lactam cleavage. Six examples from
the class were prepared using similar chemistry and each
was shown to release NO upon contact with b-lactamase and
to trigger biofilm dispersion in P. aeruginosa, an important
pathogen responsible for recalcitrant and often fatal broncho-
pulmonary biofilm infections, especially in cystic fibrosis (CF)
patients.11 Studies aimed at identifying optimal cephalosporin-
30-diazeniumdiolate development candidates for these and
other types of biofilm-based chronic infections are on-going
in our laboratories.
Fig. 3 Dispersal of P. aeruginosa biofilms by cephalosporin-30-diazeniumdiolate
free acids 1, 15–19. P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilms grown in microtiter plates were
pre-treated with imipenem (0.3 mg mLꢀ1) before exposing to various concentra-
tions of compounds (15 min) and quantifying the remaining biofilm mass by
crystal violet staining and measurement of OD550. (n = 2) Control biofilms
treated with imipenem alone produced OD550 readings of B3–3.5.
Dispersion of P. aeruginosa biofilms by cephalosporin-30-
diazeniumdiolate free acids 1, 15–19, along with the D2-isomer
16a, was examined in vitro using microtiter plate biofilm assays
(Fig. 3).5 Briefly, P. aeruginosa PAO1 wild type biofilms were
grown in 24-well plates containing sub-inhibitory imipenem
(0.3 mg mLꢀ1) to induce b-lactamase expression. After 6 h, the
biofilms were treated with test compounds and incubated
for 15 min before washing, staining with crystal violet and
quantifying the remaining biofilms by measuring OD550 of the
homogenized suspensions.
We thank the Australian National Health and Medical
Research Council (NHMRC, Project Grant 568841), the University
of Wollongong and the University of New South Wales for funding
this work.
Notes and references
1 G. Ramage, S. Culshaw, B. Jones and C. Williams, Curr. Opin. Infect.
Dis., 2010, 23, 560.
2 N. Barraud, D. J. Hassett, S.-H. Hwang, S. A. Rice, S. Kjelleberg and
J. S. Webb, J. Bacteriol., 2006, 188, 7344.
Compounds 1 and 15–19 all showed dose-dependent biofilm
dispersion responses in the range 5–100 mM. Compounds 1 and
17 appeared as the most potent members of the series reducing
biofilm mass at 5 mM by 31% and 28%, respectively. The other
compounds showed no significant effect at this concentration.
At 10 mM, compound 1 reduced biofilm mass by 78%, with only
slight further reductions being observed at higher concentrations
(87% at 50 mM, 91% at 100 mM). A similar dose dependency was
observed with 17. While less potent, the other four analogues 15,
16, 18 and 19 all reduced biofilms by more than 70% at 100 mM.
As expected, the D2-isomer of 16 (i.e., 16a) showed no dispersion
effect at any concentration, consistent with its inability to undergo
the conjugate elimination reaction to expel the diazeniumdiolate
anion following b-lactam cleavage.
Bacteria encased in biofilms are known to exhibit upwards
of 10–1000-fold higher resistance to biocides and traditional
antibiotics and to be less susceptible to host immune defences
than their free-swimming planktonic counterparts.10 As a
result, chronic bacterial infections tend to be biofilm-based.
In our anti-biofilm strategy, low concentrations of NO-donors
are used to first trigger biofilm dispersion such that the more
3 N. Barraud, M. V. Storey, Z. P. Moore, J. S. Webb, S. A. Rice and
S. Kjelleberg, Microb. Biotechnol., 2009, 2, 370.
4 N. Barraud, D. Schleheck, J. Klebensberger, J. S. Webb, D. J. Hassett,
S. A. Rice and S. Kjelleberg, J. Bacteriol., 2009, 191, 7333.
5 N. Barraud, B. G. Kardak, N. R. Yepuri, R. P. Howlin, J. S. Webb,
S. N. Faust, S. Kjelleberg, S. A. Rice and M. J. Kelso, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 9057.
6 T. B. Cai, D. Lu, M. Landerholm and P. G. Wang, Org. Lett., 2004,
6, 4203; X. Wu, X. Tang, M. Xian and P. G. Wang, Tetrahedron Lett.,
2001, 42, 3779; X. Tang, M. Xian, M. Trikha, K. V. Honn and
P. G. Wang, Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42, 2625; J. E. Saavedra,
T. M. Dunams, J. L. Flippen-Anderson and L. K. Keefer, J. Org.
Chem., 1992, 57, 6134.
7 W. F. Richter, Y. H. Chong and V. J. Stella, J. Pharm. Sci., 1990,
79, 185; C. F. Murphy and R. E. Koehler, J. Org. Chem., 1970,
35, 2429; S. Mobashery and M. Johnson, J. Org. Chem., 1986,
51, 4723.
8 http://star.ncifcrf.gov/nitricoxide/default.aspx?url=searchNO.
aspx&st=3.
9 J. E. Saavedra, M. N. Booth, J. A. Hrabie, K. M. Davies and
L. K. Keefer, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 5124.
10 D. Davies, Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery, 2003, 2, 114; D. J. Musk and
P. J. Hergenrother, Curr. Med. Chem., 2006, 13, 2163.
11 N. Høiby, T. Bjarnsholt, M. Givskov, S. Molin and O. Ciofu, Int. J.
Antimicrob. Agents, 2010, 35, 322.
12 T. P. Smyth, M. E. O’Donnell, M. J. O’Connor and J. O. St Ledger,
Tetrahedron, 2000, 56, 5699.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 4791--4793 4793