Synthesis and Spectroscopic Characterization of New Double-Armed Benzo-15-Crown-5 Derivatives 109
several previous works [11, 20–25]. It is well known
[C11H11N2O – H] groups, respectively. All of the mass
spectra show that this fragmentation pattern pro-
ceeding by the loss of etheric chains is in accordance
with the literature [26–28]. The molecular ion peaks
and fragments of the ligands and complexes support
the proposed structures.
that the Na+ cations, on the other hand, are suf-
ficiently small to fit into the cavities of benzo-15-
crown-5 moieties of the crown ethers [23–25]. Ac-
cording to the literature, the complexation of the
ligands with Na+ cations can be called as “filling
complexes.” In conventional “filling complexes,” low
chemical shifts are especially observed for the aro-
matic and crown ether protons. In the spectrum of
the complexes (1a–9a), signals of the crown car-
bon atoms are slightly shifted toward lower ppm
values. This behavior is typical of inclusion com-
plexes where Na+ ion is linked to oxygen atoms
in the benzo-15-crown-5 via ion-dipole interactions.
Apparently, Na+ ion matches the cavity of benzo-
15-crown-5 in the complex well and thus is just ac-
commodated in the crown ether ring to form 1:1
cation:ligand complexes [19]. In all of complex (1a–
9a), the characteristic crown ether OCH2CH2O
carbons were observed at between 67.46 and 70.99
ppm, as expected. The signals of the aromatic car-
bons were detected in the expected region and were
equal to the number in the proposed structures of
compounds 1a–9a. Aliphatic OCH3 carbons of the
compounds (1a, 2a, 4a, 5a 7a, and 8a) were de-
tected at 56.13, 55.24, 56.18, 55.98, 55.86, and 55.55
ppm, respectively. The aldehyde carbons ( CHO) of
compounds (1a–3a) were observed at 191.13, 191.14,
and 189.58 ppm, respectively. As expected, the imine
carbons (HC N) of the compounds (4a–9a) were ob-
served at 162.83, 162.76, 158.24, 157.23, 159.71, and
158.43 ppm, respectively. C O carbons of the com-
pounds (7a–9a) were detected at 161.18, 162.12, and
161.29 ppm, respectively.
REFERENCES
[1] Pedersen, C. J. J Am Chem Soc 1967, 89, 7017–7036.
[2] Pedersen, C. J. J Am Chem Soc 1970, 92, 386–391.
[3] Hyde, E. M.; Shaw, B. L.; Shepherd, I. J Chem Soc,
Dalton Trans 1978, 1696–1705.
[4] Timoty, M. H.; Joyce, C. L.; Martin, B.; Subva, R. J
Chem Soc, Dalton Trans 1982, 2331–2336.
[5] Lehn, J. M. Pure Appl Chem 1979, 51, 979–997.
[6] Khairutdinov, R. F.; Hurst, J. K. Langmuir 2004, 20,
1781–1785.
[7] Shinkai, S.; Ogawa, T.; Nakaji, T.; Manabe O. J Chem
Soc, Chem Commun 1980, 375–377.
[8] Shinkai, S.; Ishihara, M.; Veda, K.; Manabe, O. J
Chem Soc, Perkin Trans 1985, 2, 511–518.
[9] Dixon, S.; Brown, R. C. D.; Gale, P. A. Chem Commun
2007, 3565–3567.
[10] Mouveaux, C.; Jaeger, R.; Levalois-Gru¨tzmacher, J.
Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon 2002, 177, 1541–1544.
[11] Hayvali, Z.; Gu¨ndu¨z, N.; Kilic, Z.; Weber, E. Z Natur-
forsch b 2000, 55, 975–981.
[12] Hayvali, Z.; Gu¨ndu¨z, N.; Kilic¸, Z.; Weber, E. J Prakt
Chem 1999, 341(6) 568–573.
[13] Hayvalı, M.; Hayvalı, Z. Synth React Met Org Chem
2004, 34, 713–732.
[14] Hayvali, Z.; Yardimci, D. Transition Met Chem 2008,
33, 421–429.
[15] Hayvali, Z.; Hayvali, M.; Kilic, Z.; Ho¨kelek, T.; Weber,
E. J Incl Phenom Macrocycl Chem 2003, 45, 285–294.
[16] Zeng, W.; Mao, Z.; Li, J.; Qin, S. Synthesis 2004, 7,
1011–1014.
[17] Calverly, M. J.; Dale, J. Acta Chem Scand 1982, 36B,
241–247.
[18] Winkler, B.; Mau, A. W.-H.; Dai, L. Phys Chem Chem
Phys 2000, 2, 291–295.
Mass Spectra
[19] Liu, Y.; Han, J.-R.; Zhang, H.-Y. Supramolecular
Chem 2004, 16, 247–254.
[20] Burlov, A. S.; Tsukanov, A. V.; Borodkin, G. S.; Revin-
skii, Yu. V.; Dubonosov, A. D.; Bren, V. A.; Garnovskii,
A. D.; Tsivadze A. Yu.; Minkin, V. I. Russ J Gen Chem
2006, 76, 6, 992–996.
[21] Przybylski, P.; Schroeder, G.; Brzezinski, B.; Bartl, F.
J Phys Org Chem 2003, 16, 289–297.
[22] Huang, Z. B.; Chang, S. H. J Incl Phen Macrocycl
Chem 2006, 55, 341–346.
The APCI and API-ES mass spectra of compounds
were recorded. The mass spectra fragmentation pat-
terns of the compounds were in good agreement
with the suggested structures. The mass spectrum
of compound 1 was obtained by the APCI technique,
where no molecular ion peak was observed. How-
ever, important fragments were detected at m/z 459.2
(100%), 460.1 (27.6%), and 325.1 (37.6%). In the
API-ES mass spectrum of compound 2, the domi-
nant peak at m/z 620.0 (100%) corresponds to the
ligand plus sodium [M + Na]+. In the APCI mass
spectra of Schiff base (4), the respective molecu-
lar ion peak [M + H] was detected at m/z 755.25
(100%). In the APCI mass spectra of the Schiff base
(7), the molecular ion peak was not observed but im-
portant fragments were detected at m/z 496.2 (39%),
204.10 (100%), and 187.10 (16.6%) corresponding
to the [C26H31N3O7 – H], [C11H13N3O + H]+, and
[23] Kleinpeter, E.; Starke, I.; Stro¨hl, D.; Holdt, H.J. J Mol
Struct. 1997, 404, 273–290.
[24] Beer, P. D. J Chem Soc, Commun 1986, 1678–1680.
[25] Santhana Mariappan, S. V.; Gomathi, L.; Subrama-
nian, S. Magn Res Chem 1991, 29, 656–666.
[26] Hayvali, Z. Transition Met Chem 2009, 34, 97–101.
[27] Hayvalı, Z.; Hayvalı, M.; Dal, H. Molecules 2004, 9,
860–866.
[28] Vicente, M.; Lodeiro, C.; Adams, H.; Bastida, R.;
Blas, A.; Fenton, D. E.; Macias, A.; Rodriguez, A.;
Rodriguez-Blas, T. Eur J Inorg Chem 2000, 1015–
1024.
Heteroatom Chemistry DOI 10.1002/hc