the major molecular skeletons of the products or a prior
installation of a relatively labile free amino functionality in
one of the main starting materials. For example, the Pictetꢀ
Spengler reaction, which could be viewed as a [5 þ 1]-
annulation strategy, requires the prepreparation of the not-so-
stable tryptamines. These limitations would inevitably erode
into the product diversity of these methods. Furthermore,
most current methods could only provide the corresponding
products with substitutions at the 1-position, while access
to the 4-substituted products is extremely limited.2a Conse-
quently, a complementary method allowing more diversified
syntheses of these valuable compounds would still be highly
desirable. We presumed a new strategy for this purpose: the
six-membered tetrahydropyridine ring in these two kinds of
alkaloids might be dissected into two three-atom synthons,
which could be assembled by a FriedelꢀCrafts alkylation
and an amine-benzylation process from the corresponding
benzylic alcohols and aziridines (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1. General Direct Strategies for the Syntheses of
Tetrahydro-β-Carbolines and Tetrahydroisoquinolines
Rare-earth metal triflates have been referred to as a type
of environmentally benign efficient Lewis acid catalyst,
because they are usually stable, water-compatible, recover-
able, and reusable while still possessing strong catalytic
activity.6 These advantages have placed them among the
most privileged Lewis acid catalysts in organic synthesis.
Particularly, their unique high oxophilicity enables the use
of benzylic alcohols as green electrophilic benzylation re-
agents, which usually generates water as the only byproduct.7
Additionally, they have also showed high catalytic activities
in the ring opening of aziridines by many nucleophiles.8
However, the employment of these two processes in a single
system is rare. We report herein the applications of rare-
earth metal triflates as catalysts for a novel Lewis acid
catalyzed [3 þ 3]-annulation reaction, enabling accesses to
both 1- and/or 4-substituted tetrahydro-β-carbolines and
tetrahydroisoquinolines from simple starting materials un-
der mild conditions.
efficient catalyst in catalyzing this reaction among the
catalysts screened. A screen of catalyst loading amounts
revealed that only 2 mol % was needed to complete the
reaction in 2 h in 1,2-DCE (1,2-dichloroethane), giving the
desired product 3a in 74% yield (Table 1, entries 2ꢀ4). It is
worth mentioning that the reaction is tolerant of moisture
and could be performed in commercial solvents under air.
The use of ScCl3 6H2O with weaker Lewis acidicity and
3
other rare-earth metal triflates like those of Y, La, and Yb
were inferior for this reaction (Table 1, entries 6ꢀ10).
Notably, the order of catalytic activity of these catalysts
for this reaction is also in a good accordance with their
Lewis acidity.9 Solvents such as nitromethane and THF
bearing coordinative O-atoms are highly detrimental to
the reaction (Table 1, entries 10ꢀ11). Thus the optimum
reaction conditions for the [3 þ 3]-annulation included 2
mol % of Sc(OTf)3 in 1,2-DCE for 2 h at reflux.
Our initial studies commenced with the reaction of
N-methyl-2-indolylmethanol 1a and aziridine 2a (Table 1).
In the absence of a catalyst, no reaction took place
(Table 1, entry 1). It is found that Sc(OTf)3 was the highly
Table 1. Screen of the Reaction Conditionsa
(4) For recent examples: (a) Berhal, F.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Ayad, T.;
Ratovelomanana-Vidal, V. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 3308. (b) Xie, J.-H.; Yan,
P.-C.; Zhang, Q.-Q.; Yuan, K. X.; Zhou, Q.-L. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 561.
(c) Chang, M.; Li, W.; Zhang, X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 10679.
(d) Li, C.; Xiao, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13208.
entry
cat. (x mol %)
solvent
time
yieldb (%)
(5) (a) Xu, Q.-L.; Dai, L.-X.; You, S.-L. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2579. (b)
Richter-Addo, G. B.; Knight, D. A.; Dewey, M. A.; Arit, A. M.; Gladyz,
J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 11863 and ref 2d.
(6) For reviews: (a) Kobayashi, S.; Sugiura, M.; Kitagawa, H.; Lam,
W. W.-L. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 2227. (b) Prakash, G. K. S.; Mathew, T.;
Olah, G. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 45, 565. (c) Luo, S.; Zhu, L.;
Talukdar, A.; Zhang, G.; Mi, X.; Cheng, J.-P.; Wang, P. G. Mini-Rev.
Org. Chem. 2005, 2, 177.
(7) (a) Noji, M.; Konno, Y.; Ishii, K. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 5161. (b)
Noji, M.; Ohno, T.; Fuji, K.; FuIshii, K. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 9340. (c)
Tsuchimoto, T.; Tobita, K.; Hiyama, T.; Fukuzawa, S. Synlett 1996,
557. (d) Tsuchimoto, T.; Tobita, K.; Hiyama, T.; Fukuzawa, S. J. Org.
Chem. 1997, 62, 6997. (e) Sharma, G. V. M; Mahalingam, A. K. J. Org.
Chem. 1999, 64, 8943.
(8) For recent reviews on the ring openings of aziridines: (a)
Stankovic, S.; D’Hooghe, M.; Catak, S.; Eum, H.; Waroquier, M.;
Van Speybroeck, V.; De Kimpe, N.; Ha, H.-J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41,
643. (b) Singh, G. S.; D’Hooghe, M.; De Kimpe, N. Chem. Rev. 2007,
107, 2080. (c) Lu, P. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 2549.
1
no catalyst
Sc(OTf)3 (10)
Sc(OTf)3 (5)
Sc(OTf)3 (2)
Sc(OTf)3 (1)
1,2-DCE
1,2-DCE
1,2-DCE
1,2-DCE
1,2-DCE
1,2-DCE
1,2-DCE
1,2-DCE
1,2-DCE
CHCl3
12 h
0.5 h
1 h
0
2
74
74
74
56
36
55
46
62
46
0
3
4
2 h
5
5 h
6
ScCl3 6H2O (10)
4 h
3
7
Y(OTf)3 (10)
La(OTf)3 (10)
Yb(OTf)3 (10)
Sc(OTf)3 (10)
Sc(OTf)3 (10)
Sc(OTf)3 (10)
4 h
8
12 h
1 h
9
10
11
12
0.5 h
0.2 h
0.5 h
CH3NO2
THF
15
a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.6 mmol), 2a (0.5 mmol), catalyst
(x mmol), solvent (3 mL). b Yield of the isolated pure product.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX