Angewandte
Chemie
a number of control experiments with commercially available
ligands (Scheme 2, Table 4).
Scheme 2. Ligands used in control experiments to unveil the role of
each unit in ligand L9.
Figure 1. SEM of the ground anhydrous K2CO3 suspended in Et2O in
the absence (left) and presence of H2O (1 equiv; right). Scale bar:
200 mm.
The enantioselectivities and catalytic activities observed
with the Ph2P-substituted ligands L5 and L6 were very
similar; the reaction proceeded (albeit at a very slow rate)
with higher enantioselectivity with another Ph2P-substituted
ligand, L10, most probably because of the presence of the two
five-membered rings. As expected, the more electron-rich
nature of the phosphorus atoms in L11 as a result of the
electron-donating Ar group greatly improved the activity of
the particle size of K2CO3 in Et2O upon the addition of water
(1 equiv) with stirring (Figure 1, right) is much smaller than
that of anhydrous K2CO3 (Figure 1, left; for detailed infor-
mation, see the Supporting Information).
ꢀ
the oxidative addition to cleave the C O bond in the allene
In conclusion, we have developed a highly enantioselec-
tive protocol for the asymmetric allenylation of diethyl
malonate with racemic 2,3-allenyl acetates. Owing to the
excellent generality of the reaction, its functional-group
tolerance, the mild reaction conditions, the ready availability
of all starting chemicals,[6] and the synthetic potential of the
chiral products, this reaction will be of high interest for
organic, materials, and medicinal chemists. We are pursuing
further studies in this area, in particular the construction of
both axial and central chirality in allenyl malonates.
1a (Table 4, entry 4). Thus, we conclude that in L9, the 4,4’-
bibenzo[d][1,3]dioxole unit together with the bulky C6H2(m-
tBu)2(p-OMe) group are responsible for the high enantiose-
lectivity, and the electron-rich nature of the phosphorus
atoms leads to the high catalytic activity.
Table 4: Investigation into the factors dictating the enantioselectivity.[a]
Entry
Ligand
Recovery
Yield [%][d]
ee [%][e]
of 1a [%][c]
Experimental Section
1
2
3
4
5
(R)-L5
(R)-L6
(R)-L10
(R)-L11
(R)-L9
22
20
66
0
51
59
9
83
81
48
54
67
67
94
Typical procedure: [{Pd(p-cinnamyl)Cl}2] (6.4 mg, 0.0125 mmol), (R)-
DTBM-segphos (L9; 35.5 mg, 0.03 mmol), 1b (70.5 mg, 0.5 mmol),
and Et2O (2.5 mL) were added sequentially to a Schlenk tube
containing ground anhydrous K2CO3 (138.1 mg, 1.0 mmol) under
nitrogen. Then 2c (160.0 mg, 1.0 mmol), Et2O (2.5 mL), and H2O
(9 mL, 0.5 mmol) were added sequentially with stirring, and the
Schlenk tube was equipped with a reflux condenser to avoid loss of
the solvent. The reaction was complete after the mixture had been
stirred at 208C for 24 h, as monitored by TLC (eluent: petroleum
ether/ethyl acetate (20:1)). After filtration through a short pad of
silica gel with Et2O (50 mL) and the evaporation of volatile
components of the mixture, purification by chromatography on
silica gel afforded (S)-3b (90.2 mg, 75%, 93% ee, eluent: n-hexane/
ethyl acetate (50:1)) as a liquid. HPLC conditions: Chiralpak PA-2
column, eluent: n-hexane/iPrOH (97:3), rate: 0.5 mLminꢀ1; l =
0
[a] Reaction conditions: 1a (0.5 mmol), 2c (2.0 equiv), [{Pd(p-cinna-
myl)Cl}2] (2.5 mol%), chiral ligand (6.0 mol%), K2CO3 (2.0 equiv), H2O
(1.0 equiv), Et2O (5 mL), 208C, 24 h. [b] K2CO3 bought from Alfa Aesar
was used after it had been baked in a Muffle furnace at 3808C for 6 h.
[c] The quantity of 1a was determined by NMR spectroscopy by analysis
of the crude product with mesitylene as an internal standard. [d] Yield of
the isolated product. [e] The ee value was determined by HPLC analysis
on a chiral phase.
20
220 nm; tR = 14.6 min (major), 15.7 min (minor). ½aꢁD ¼ + 18.1 (c =
1
=
0.99, CHCl3); H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d = 5.17–5.01 (m, 1H,
To explain the effect of water, we reasoned that the
solubility of K2CO3 in water makes the two-phase reaction
a three-phase reaction and increases the efficiency of
deprotonation to generate the malonate anion, since it was
noted that the enantioselectivity is almost the same in the
absence of water: the difference lies in the yield [Eq. (5)]. In
fact, it was observed by SEM studies (Hitachi SU 1510) that
=
CH), 4.75–4.61 (m, 2H, CH2), 4.25–4.07 (m, 4H, 2 ꢀ CH2), 3.35 (d,
J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, CH), 2.79–2.63 (m, 1H, CH), 1.60–1.15 (m, 8H, CH2
and 2 ꢀ CH3), 0.90 ppm (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (75 MHz,
CDCl3): d = 208.4, 168.3, 168.1, 90.3, 75.6, 61.2, 61.1, 56.6, 40.3, 25.5,
~
14.0, 11.4 ppm; IR (neat): n = 2979, 2937, 2872, 1958, 1751, 1732, 1464,
1369, 1258, 1177, 1097, 1035 cmꢀ1; MS (EI): m/z (%): 240 (M+, 36.71),
79 (100); HRMS calcd for C13H20O4 (M+): 240.1362; found: 240.1369.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 11783 –11786
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim