Y. Yong et al.
1H NMR data of derivative 7 published previously agree well with
the current NMR data, those of derivatives 2 and 3 do not.[15,16,18]
To clarify the results, their HMQC spectra were elucidated. As
shown in Fig. 4, in derivatives 2, 3, 7, 19, and 22, the 1H chemical
shift of H-a was more deshielded than that of H-b. Although the
H-a values of five derivatives are more deshielded than the H-b
values, H-a of derivative 16 is more shielded than H-b. In five
derivatives except 16, the cross peak of H-a/C-a is observed
in the top left. It means that the 1H chemical shift of H-a is
more deshielded than that of H-b. On the contrary, in deriva-
tive 16, the cross peak of H-a/C-a is observed in the top
right. Its H-a is more shielded than H-b. The 1H NMR data
of derivative 2 published previously[15] reported that H-50
(7.51–7.46 ppm) was more deshielded than H-40 (6.96–6.91 ppm),
but our experimental results showed H-40 at 7.55 ppm and H-50
at 7.00 ppm. The HMQC spectrum (Figure 5) confirmed that our
data are correct.
Figure 5. Partial HMQC spectrum of derivative 2 showing H-40/C-40
The results in this study provide a useful tool for structural
identification of new hydroxymethoxychalcones.
(circle) and H-50/C-50 (square) regions.
impact ionization mass spectrometer (HREIMS, JMS700; JEOL Ltd.,
Tokyo, Japan) with the help of the Korea Basic Science Institute at
Daegu, Korea.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Priority Research Centers
Program (NRF, 2012–0006686), Agenda program (RDA,
PJ907145), the NRF funded by MEST (2010–0020966), and the
next generation Biogreen21 program (RDA, PJ009532). Y. Yong,
S. Ahn, and D. Hwang contributed equally to this work.
Results and Discussion
The 24 structures and names of the 20-hydroxychalcone deriva-
tives are shown in Fig. 2. Among them, the novel compounds
were 10, 16, 18, 19, and 21. The 1H and/or 13C NMR data
of compounds 1–8, 13, 22, and 23 were reported previously.[14–20]
As noted earlier, eight derivatives, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 20, and
24, were known, but their NMR data had not been reported.
References
[1] C. Wyns, K. van Steendam, B. Vanhoecke, D. Deforce, M. Bracke, A.
Heyerick. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2012, 56, 1688.
[2] Y. Zhang, B. Srinivasan, C. Xing, J. Lu. Anticancer Res. 2012, 32, 3689.
[3] Y. Pan, Y. Chen, X. Yu, J. Wang, L. Zhang, Y. He, Y. Zheng, J. Zheng.
Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 29, 949.
[4] N. K. Sahu, S. S. Balbhadra, J. Choudhary, D. V. Kohli. Curr. Med. Chem.
2012, 19, 209.
[5] H. J. Shin, D. H. Shon, H. S. Youn. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2013,
15, 38.
[6] T. D. Tran, T. T. Nguyen, T. H. Do, T. N. Huynh, C. D. Tran, K. M. Thai.
Molecules 2012, 17, 6684.
[7] T. D. Tran, H. Park, H. P. Kim, G. F. Ecker, K. M. Thai. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2009, 19, 1650.
[8] R. Kachadourian, B. J. Day, S. Pugazhenti, C. C. Franklin, E. Genoux-
Bastide, G. Mahaffey, C. Gauthier, A. Di Pietro, A. Boumendjel. J.
Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 1382.
The procedure used to assign the NMR data of derivative 16 is
described here. Nineteen peaks were detected in the 13C NMR spec-
trum of compound 16, and the most deshielded carbon at
194.5 ppm was due to a ketone group. All protonated carbons were
assigned on the basis of the HMQC spectrum. In the HMBC spec-
trum, two protons at 7.09 and 7.49 ppm showed long-range cou-
plings with the carbon at 194.5 ppm, and these proton peaks
were correlated to each other in the COSY spectrum. Thus, these
protons were assigned to H-a and H-b. Because the COSY spectrum
showed two types of correlations, protons of A-ring and B-ring were
assigned. Two quaternary carbons at 115.7 and 120.8 ppm were
identified as C10 and C1, respectively, on the basis of the long-
range coupling of H-a and H-b because only H-a showed long-
range coupling of C-10 at 115.7ppm. The positions of methoxy
groups were easily assigned because long-range couplings
between methoxy protons and carbons connecting the basic struc-
ture of chalcone were clearly detected. The proton–proton correla-
tions and carbon–proton long-ranged couplings were determined
on the basis of the interpretations of the COSY and HMBC spectra,
respectively. The important connections obtained from COSY
and HMBC are shown in Fig. 3. According to the collective assign-
ments of 1H and 13C chemical shifts, derivative 16 was confirmed to
be (E)-1-(2-hydroxy-6-methoxyphenyl)-3-(2,3,4-trim-ethoxyphenyl)
prop-2-en-1-one. The assignments of the NMR data of the other
23 20-hydroxychalcones were performed using procedures similar
[9] T. D. Tran, T. H. Do, N. C. Tran, T. D. Ngo, T. N. Huynh, C. D. Tran, K. M.
Thai. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 4555.
[10] Y. Yoon, Y. Park, Y. Lee, Y. S. Yi, G. Jo, J. C. Park, J. H. Ahn, Y. Lim. J.
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 20, 1359.
[11] H. Yoon, S. Ahn, D. Hwang, G. Jo, D. W. Kim, S. H. Kim, D. Koh, Y. Lim.
Magn. Reson. Chem. 2012, 50, 759.
[12] D. Hwang, G. Jo, J. Hyun, S. D. Lee, D. Koh, Y. Lim. Magn. Reson. Chem.
2012, 50, 62.
[13] T. D. Goddard, D. G. Kneller, SPARKY3, University of California, San
Francisco, 2008.
[14] P. W. Freeman, S. T. Murphy, J. E. Nemorin, W. C. Taylor. Aust. J. Chem.
1981, 34, 1779.
[15] A. Detsi, M. Majdalani, C. A. Kontogiorgis, D. Hadjipavlou-Litina, P.
Kefalas. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 8073.
[16] S. F. Nielsen, S. B. Christensen, G. Cruciani, A. Kharazmi, T. Liljefors. J.
Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 4819.
[17] J. Wu, J. Li, Y. Cai, Y. Pan, F. Ye, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhao, S. Yang, X. Li, G.
1
to those for derivative 16. All H and 13C NMR data are listed in
Liang. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 8110.
[18] A. I. R. N. A. Barros, A. M. S. Silva, J. Elguero. Tetrahedron 2004, 60,
6513.
Tables 1 and 2, respectively.
In most derivatives, the chemical shifts of H-b were more
deshielded than those of H-a. In contrast, in derivatives 2, 3, 7,
19, and 22, H-a was more deshielded than H-b. Although the
[19] A. M. S. Silva, J. A. S. Cavaleiro, G. Tarrago, C. Marzin. New J. Chem.
1999, 329.
[20] S. Mostahar, S. Alam, A. Islam. Indian J. Chem. 2006, 45B, 1478.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/mrc
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Magn. Reson. Chem. 2013, 51, 364–370